Reply to thread

What are you saying? I have already ruled out all other possibilities.


That the first cause, whatever you might want to call it, is infinite, incontingent and necessary.


That because of this, the first cause is effectively beyond the methods of science.


Take note that the words I used have very distinct meanings that can withstand logical scrutiny.




Again, if it is a wild conclusion, it would be a simple matter to show exactly where the defect in logic is.




What initial assumption have I made that is not valid, hmmm?


That all contingent phenomena have causes? How is that invalid, eh?


Back
Top