You cannot prove its unconstitutionality and so you pin your hopes on a numbers game -- by proposing an absurd piece of positive law that could only be valid based on a majority sentiment -- NO FACTS, NO LOGIC.
I am quite aware of what your rhetoric really amounts to.
But unlike gay marriage, some of the causes of the civil rights movement actually had arguments based on REASON.
If there is no first cause, it would be FATAL to EVERYTHING THAT WE KNOW.
Imagine a controlled laboratory experiment. How much of the result happened with no cause at all, hmmm?
Or, even if you repeat the experiment as much as you wish, what makes you think that the next time, something that has no cause would be introduced in the result, hmmm?
Its like watching a replay of a basketball game and you wishing the result would be different.
Duh?
Like this one right here. Do you actually believe what you are saying would be deemed any more correct without providiing some logic?
Of course it is wrong. Did you think you can define a word any which way you wish to support your nonsense?
I didn't think it was possible to be so ignorant and dignified at the same time. Good luck with that.
