Reply to thread

"OK, and if in a hundred years, nobody was still able to disprove that there is no Flying Spagetti Monster roaming around space, according to your logic, it would then become a scientific Fact that Flying Spaghetti Monsters exist, right?"

--Technically, it would be a Scientific Law even though it weren't true. That's how scientific methodology works. While it's the best we've got to go on for now, it's a human invention not perfect. Nor, is it my logic (which is not perfect either).


"Your theory must be falsifiable. So explain to me how I could disprove your theory of Gods Existence. And then lets test it."

--well, don't you feel you've already done that? But, ok, "God exists. We can't know him through our senses, but by observing nature, cause and effect, space and time and their limitations on us and everything we can observe, we can see that we were actively created by something that had the intention to create."


Back
Top