Reply to thread

That's what I was taught as well .....

QUEER: as defined by Merriam-Webster


1)  a :  worthless, counterfeit <queer money>

   

     b :  questionable, suspicious


2)  a :  differing in some odd way from what is usual or normal

    

      b  (1) :  eccentric, unconventional (2) :  mildly insane :  touched


      c :  absorbed or interested to an extreme or unreasonable degree :  obsessed


      d  (1) often disparaging :  homosexual (2) sometimes offensive :  gay 4b


3)  :  not quite well


What gives these wacko leftist the right to continue to redefine words, events, and history in our culture?  Just because it makes a gender confused person feel good?


In the article above it says:


“It’s true that for many years lots of people were called ‘queer’ and it was a derogatory term and they find it offensive, but there’s definitely a younger generation that is trying to reform the term and give it new meaning,” Fuller said


Again, what gives these wackos the right to "reform" which really means redefine this term.  What gives them the right to redefine marriage?


I do not have a problem with these kind of people and I certainly do not support any discrimination against them.  But, I am a 100% against them and the wacko liberals that support them changing the definition of words and language.


They simply do not have the right nor does anyone else in our society to do so just because it makes the confused feel good!


Back
Top