Reply to thread

Re: Remind me again what part of the Const authorizes the Fed govt to run Health Care



Nonsense. Are you seriously trying to claim the Framers meant for the U.S. Government to provide "free" health care for every U.S. citizen?


The very fact that some people will need more spent on theirhealth care than others, puts this outside any authority the govt may have.



The same argument could be made for the govt to take over supplying all food, all shelter, all clothing etc... positions that would be every bit as nonsensical as the assertion that the Fed govt is authorized to run Health Care. 



Thanks for the standard big-government-should-run-everything view. It has failed nearly every time it has been tried, frequently resulting in mass famine, disease, and even death.


The Framers knew what they were doing in restricting the government from such grandiose (and arrogant) schemes. Too bad the same cannot be said about the people presently in majorities in our government.




Correct! You just raised your grade from an F to a D+.


But Nebraska will have to take a number and stand in a LONG line, behind the deals cut for Social Security, Welfare, the EPA, US v. Miller, and a host of other unconstitutional things the govt has done. Despite their clear, solid legal reasons for being unconstitutional, don't count on any of them getting overturned any time soon.




It would be a lot easier to name the Senators who did... or at least it wouldn't take as long, since the list is short.


Back
Top