Simply not true. I believe that you believe it, but that does not make it true. QM can't even explain the electron cloud of a hydrogen atom without an ad hoc assumption...it doesn't even begin to explain the periodic table so don't try and pretend that QM is settled science engraved in stone.
And your errors simply compound and compound. You like to pretend that you grasp and understand physics, but you keep making elementary errors. Here, from various source that certainly have a far better grasp of physics than you.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/thermalP/Lesson-2/Measuring-the-Quantity-of-Heat
On the previous page, we learned what heat does to an object when it is gained or released. Heat gains or losses result in changes in temperature, changes in state or the performance of work. Heat is a transfer of energy. When gained or lost by an object, there will be corresponding energy changes within that object. A change in temperature is associated with changes in the average kinetic energy of the particles within the object.
http://www.chemteam.info/Thermochem/Energy-Work-Heat-Temp.html
There is a lot of misunderstanding about what heat is, so let's try and make it real clear: heat is not a thing, heat is a process. Here's the definition: heat is the transfer of energy between two objects due to temperature differences. Notice that the name of the transfer process is heat. What gets transfered is energy. Heat is NOT a substance although it is very convenient to think of it that way. In fact, it used to be thought that heat was a substance.
http://physics.csustan.edu/Marvin/HowThingsWork/Temperature/Temperature.htm
Heat is a transfer of energy, not a substance.
http://www.ic.sunysb.edu/Class/phy141md/doku.php?id=phy141:lectures:35
The first law is a powerful statement of the conservation of energy, indeed conservation of energy can only be understood once we understand that heat is a transfer of energy.
http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/thermo/glossary.shtml
Heat is a transfer of energy that occurs when objects with different temperatures are placed into contact. Heat is a process, not a property of a material.
http://www.chemistry.wustl.edu/~edudev/LabTutorials/Thermochem/Fridge.html
Adding heat causes intermolecular attractions to be broken.How does this occur? Heat is a transfer of energy to molecules, causing the molecules to increase their motion as described by the kinetic theory of gases
http://physics.bu.edu/~rebbi/py251_lect11.pdf
Historically this phenomenon was at- tributed to a flow of “heat” from the hotter to the colder object. It has been known for a while that this flow of heat is a transfer of energy....
And I could go on and on ad nauseum to practically any physical science text or center of learning which would say the same thing I have said, because contrary to your claim, heat is, in fact, a transfer of energy.
And again from the Georgia State physics department:
Temperature is expressed as the inverse of the rate of change of entropy with internal energy, with volume V and number of particles N held constant. This is certainly not as intuitive as molecular kinetic energy, but in thermodynamic applications it is more reliable and more general.
And the errors continue to compound. High entropy....low entropy.....high temperature....low temperature....For energy to move from a cooler object to a warmer object, it would have to go from a higher entropy state (cooler) to a lower entropy state (warmer). Don't you understand that without the addition of work, entropy always increases. I am sorry that I confused you with such a technical term....you did, after all pretend to understand this stuff. Had I said energy moving from a cool object to a warmer object it would have been the same as saying energy moving from a high entropy state to a lower entropy state.
Guess not, since it is becoming more than obvious that you don't actually understand any of this.
Alas, I am afraid it is you who fails to grasp...which perhaps explains why you have fallen so hard for the hoax..
Do you believe that California Polytech understands entropy?
http://www.calpoly.edu/~rbrown/entropy.html
Nature proceeds from the simple to the complex, from the orderly to the disorderly, from low entropy to high entropy.
The laughter was over your complete misunderstanding...the laughter was because you don't grasp that heat is not a thing, but the very transfer of energy itself.
As the quotes from the various educational institutions above prove, it is you who is confused regarding the meaning of the terms heat and energy. Why do you continue to pretend that you grasp this topic when it is abundantly clear that you don't?
We can't discuss photons till you prove their existence. When might you get around to that? At this point, you really should take the time to at least learn the basics....you have made so many fundamental errors in just these few exchanges that I am embarrassed for you. It seems that you are to ignorant to even grasp your own humiliation.
