Should this be bidens and trumps fate

lol and what proof do you have that he didnt take them they are in his office in a closet in pen and in his garage and in his file cabinet do you think the tooth fairy put them all there . Again intent has nothing to do with it its having them . No one will ever know his intent . The chances are he forgot about them but its like having a bag of cocaine in your pocket its dont matter how you claim it got there its in yoiur possession . Same with trump the difference is I don't make excuses for trump and you do for Biden you always support the criminals on here . You not man enough to admit the truth

LOL that's not how this works, *****.

YOU accused him of being guilty, i asked YOU for YOUR proof. duh.

god you're stupid.

and no, its NOT like having a bag of cocaine. the law clearly states you need INTENT for these papers.
its not the same for trump he showed his INTENT by fighting to keep them. duh.

god you're stupid. lol
 
Werbung:
LOL that's not how this works, *****.

YOU accused him of being guilty, i asked YOU for YOUR proof. duh.

god you're stupid.

and no, its NOT like having a bag of cocaine. the law clearly states you need INTENT for these papers.
its not the same for trump he showed his INTENT by fighting to keep them. duh.

god you're stupid. lol
Here is how it is. Congress asks Hillary to turn in her government emails. She destroys them and all the various devices in which she illegally stored them, and then her pal Comey forgives her.
 
Here is how it is. Congress asks Hillary to turn in her government emails. She destroys them and all the various devices in which she illegally stored them, and then her pal Comey forgives her.

and you're STILL obsessing about hillary...why?
 
and you're STILL obsessing about hillary...why?
You want to discuss mishandling classified information and documents yet you do not want to talk about any historical precedent for the handling and disposal of such mishandling?
 
You want to discuss mishandling classified information and documents yet you do not want to talk about any historical precedent for the handling and disposal of such mishandling?


sure, show how hillary is exactly the same circumstances as trump and therefore what it means for trump.
go for it.


a good review of they aren't the same. duh. lol

Bradley Moss, a Washington-based lawyer who works on national security cases, said the cases of Clinton and Trump are significantly different.

"Trump took properly marked hard copy classified documents from the White House, shipped them to Florida, and stored them in an unsecured location at his residence," Moss said.
The presence of classified information in Clinton’s emails was less obvious.

"The e-mails were never marked as classified because these were communications from unclassified government accounts," Moss said.

Overall, the agency said it was reasonably confident that there was no intentional misconduct.



so..apples and oranges. duh
 
Last edited:
sure, show how hillary is exactly the same circumstances as trump and therefore what it means for trump.
go for it.
Hillary is not the same as Trump. She kept classified documents on illegal mobile devices that US intelligence knows were hacked by foreign enemies of the US. Trump kept classified documents in a locked vault he opened more than once to government investigators at their request prior to their uncalled-for raid.
 
Hillary is not the same as Trump. She kept classified documents on illegal mobile devices that US intelligence knows were hacked by foreign enemies of the US. Trump kept classified documents in a locked vault he opened more than once to government investigators at their request prior to their uncalled-for raid.

i just posted actual reviews that show they aren't the same, that trump was worse. duh

and the fbi had to raid him after he refused to turn over all the documents. duh.
 
i just posted actual reviews that show they aren't the same, that trump was worse. duh

and the fbi had to raid him after he refused to turn over all the documents. duh.
For extra credit: Can you tell me how many times Trump invited FBI agents into his home to view the documents in question before the uncalled-for raid?
 
For extra credit: Can you tell me how many times Trump invited FBI agents into his home to view the documents in question before the uncalled-for raid?

for extra credit: why did they require a search warrant? you only get that if you have evidence that a judge agrees that a crime was likely commited.
 
for extra credit: why did they require a search warrant? you only get that if you have evidence that a judge agrees that a crime was likely commited.
Don't try to weasel out of the truth. Trump has always been open with the FBI. The democrats lie when they brand Trump as a thief. The democrats are thieves. They were not after records requested by the National Archives. The National Archives is a mess. They cannot even tell Americans what documents Biden has had all these years.

The democrats used the FBI to raid Trump's home to get legally-owned documents he intended to use against Hillary in his lawsuit against her for illegal defamation.
 
Don't try to weasel out of the truth. Trump has always been open with the FBI. The democrats lie when they brand Trump as a thief. The democrats are thieves. They were not after records requested by the National Archives. The National Archives is a mess. They cannot even tell Americans what documents Biden has had all these years.

The democrats used the FBI to raid Trump's home to get legally-owned documents he intended to use against Hillary in his lawsuit against her for illegal defamation.

legally owned? not according to nara and the courts, *****.
 
Of course he legally owned documents. Democrats were lying when they claimed all they seized were illegal documents.
No stupid. If the documents were classified, they belong to the govt and private houses are not a normal place.

The democrats didn't lie about anything because they never raided either property. It was the DOJ.
Where do you get your info from? A minties packet?
You're brain dead.
 
legally owned? not according to nara and the courts, *****.
Don't try to weasel out of the truth. Trump has always been open with the FBI. The democrats lie when they brand Trump as a thief.
He is now recorded officially as a tea leaf because he stole classified docos.
The democrats are thieves. They were not after records requested by the National Archives. The National Archives is a mess.
How would you know if they were a mess and who did request the docos? Tell us big mouth.
They cannot even tell Americans what documents Biden has had all these years.
Did they tell us what documents Trump had? Do they normally splash it across the media advertising it? Grow up.
The democrats used the FBI to raid Trump's home to get legally-owned documents he intended to use against Hillary in his lawsuit against her for illegal defamation.
How could you have unique access to that knowledge?
He has not commenced defamation charges nor does he have evidence there was any or he would have done so. I suspect it's you who Hilary to the point of suing her, if you could. You are fabricating hate because your god got his arse kicked.
 
Werbung:
No stupid. If the documents were classified, they belong to the govt and private houses are not a normal place.

The democrats didn't lie about anything because they never raided either property. It was the DOJ.
Where do you get your info from? A minties packet?
You're brain dead.
None of this has been sorted out in court so democrats claim their mobsters took nothing that was not highly illegal for Trump to have. Of course, the thieves would claim that knowing dummies would believe them and nobody could get past their justice department gatekeepers to find out otherwise.
 
Back
Top