The Bush-"Legacy"

[Gipper]

OMG! Shaman, you sound like a broken record! Don't you ever get tired of bashing the ex president? I mean, I was never a fan of his either, but he hasn't been in power for going on a year now. C'mon! Let's get a new subject already.

Never happen. 20 years from now leftists will still be bashing Bush.

If one makes a valid criticism of BO, leftists like Shaman respond with a criticism of Bush. Nonsensical and very childish, but also very typical of the left.

 

[Gipper]

YES, I agree, G.W.BUSH turned into a "PROGRESSIVE" politically in his second term and paved the way for Obama, a more dangerous Progressive than BUSH.

Another Point, It is sad to see the HOUSE OF POITICS , POLITICAL FORUM is tainted with a BIASED MODERATOR like BUNZ. This guy is so Left Wing biased that he calls post favoring other views than his "rants", then proceeds to delete that post, sometimes changing the poster words as he calls it "ranting." Yet, we have this RANTING BUSH BASHER named SHAMAN who CONSTANTLY POST his stories calling Bush everything nasty and ole BUNZ never once ever DELETES his GARBAGE. THIS FORM MUST INSIST ON FAIRNESS BY MODERATORS. FREE SPEECH MUST BE OBSERVED BUNZ BE DAMNED! BIASED MODERATORS WHO ONLY SEE AND ALLOW THEIR VIEWS ARE WORTHLESS TO ANY HONEST FORUM. WE MUST ALL RESPECT THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO PRESENT THEIR THOUGHTS IN A RESPECTFUL AND MORAL WAY. NO OBSCENITY PLEASE,Nothing is more OBSCENE THAN BANNING ANOTHERS THOUGHT SIMPLE BECAUSE A MODERATOR DOES NOT LIKE THE POLITICS! I MUST SAY The VAST MAJORITY OF THE MODERATORS ARE VERY TALENTED AND PROFESSIONAL IN THE WAY THE ALLOW DIFFERENT THOUGHTS TO BE EXPRESSED.BUT IT TAKES ONLY ONE TO DESTROY A FREE FORUM. WE HAVE THAT ONE!

Well yes. But, I thought this was a forum where both sides could freely debate. Why would they hire a moderator with leftist views?

 

[Mr. Shaman]

OMG! Shaman, you sound like a broken record! Don't you ever get tired of bashing the ex president? I mean, I was never a fan of his either, but he hasn't been in power for going on a year now. C'mon! Let's get a new subject already.

Uhhhhhhh....the subject (HERE) is Legacy; i.e. : something transmitted by or received from an ancestor or predecessor or from the past.

Maybe you simply lost-your-way......​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

WOW...with all of the material that we have access to {8 years worth...8 loooong horrendous/life altering years} and a continual body count of 4,500 plus {not counting the thousands of wounded}...seems rather frivolous of us to just "NOT KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT"

And with all of those 'talking heads' from that administration that just can't seem to STHU...why we get force feed their opinions on a daily basis...so why should we ignore little Georgie and his tribe of inept liars?

AVOIDING to "...learn from the past." would seem the obvious-reason.

Ya' can't very-well maintain the Tea-Party-momentum, if ya' let that, there learnin'-stuff get in-the-way....

​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

YES, I agree, G.W.BUSH turned into a "PROGRESSIVE" politically in his second term and paved the way for Obama, a more dangerous Progressive than BUSH.

Another Point, It is sad to see the HOUSE OF POITICS , POLITICAL FORUM is tainted with a BIASED MODERATOR like BUNZ. This guy is so Left Wing biased that he calls post favoring other views than his "rants", then proceeds to delete that post, sometimes changing the poster words as he calls it "ranting."

Gee....shouldn't you be going-to/whining-to BigRob, about this?

Isn't he your Moderator??

​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

One trick pony, not unlike the president. And everyone else in the administration it seems.

Wow....how insightful....


​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Never happen. 20 years from now leftists will still be bashing Bush.

If one makes a valid criticism of BO, leftists like Shaman respond with a criticism of Bush.

Yeah....pointing-out the Right-Wingers' hypocrisy is soooooooooo unfair.

​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Well yes. But, I thought this was a forum where both sides could freely debate. Why would they hire a moderator with leftist views?

....Because this forum (also) "hires" Moderators (like BigRob) with (admittedly) right-wing...er, conservative...views???????

​

 

[PLC1]

YES, I agree, G.W.BUSH turned into a "PROGRESSIVE" politically in his second term and paved the way for Obama, a more dangerous Progressive than BUSH.

Another Point, It is sad to see the HOUSE OF POITICS , POLITICAL FORUM is tainted with a BIASED MODERATOR like BUNZ. This guy is so Left Wing biased that he calls post favoring other views than his "rants", then proceeds to delete that post, sometimes changing the poster words as he calls it "ranting." Yet, we have this RANTING BUSH BASHER named SHAMAN who CONSTANTLY POST his stories calling Bush everything nasty and ole BUNZ never once ever DELETES his GARBAGE. THIS FORM MUST INSIST ON FAIRNESS BY MODERATORS. FREE SPEECH MUST BE OBSERVED BUNZ BE DAMNED! BIASED MODERATORS WHO ONLY SEE AND ALLOW THEIR VIEWS ARE WORTHLESS TO ANY HONEST FORUM. WE MUST ALL RESPECT THE RIGHT OF OTHERS TO PRESENT THEIR THOUGHTS IN A RESPECTFUL AND MORAL WAY. NO OBSCENITY PLEASE,Nothing is more OBSCENE THAN BANNING ANOTHERS THOUGHT SIMPLE BECAUSE A MODERATOR DOES NOT LIKE THE POLITICS! I MUST SAY The VAST MAJORITY OF THE MODERATORS ARE VERY TALENTED AND PROFESSIONAL IN THE WAY THE ALLOW DIFFERENT THOUGHTS TO BE EXPRESSED.BUT IT TAKES ONLY ONE TO DESTROY A FREE FORUM. WE HAVE THAT ONE!

Expressing an opinion that you don't agree with is not a violation of forum rules.

Before you go spouting off about how the mods are "liberals" and won't allow dissenting opinions, better read some of the posts made by Big Rob, the Scotsman, and me. No doubt you consider me a radical leftist, as I nearly always think your rants are way off of the mark. If you think Big Rob is a "leftist" also, then you have a strange definition of that term. I also think that Shaman's posts are pretty far off in left field most of the time, too. That doesn't mean that I want to delete them because I think they're wrong.

A forum in which everyone agrees would be a pretty dull forum.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I also think that Shaman's posts are pretty far off in left field most of the time, too. That doesn't mean that I want to delete them because I think they're wrong.

I prefer to think of them as indisputable.

 

[PLC1]

I prefer to think of them as indisputable.

Yes, I know. Like I said, a forum in which everyone agrees is a pretty dull forum.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Yes, I know. Like I said, a forum in which everyone agrees is a pretty dull forum.

As-long-as people feel some heavy-duty need to walk on eggshells, so as not to upset the whiners...who proceed to badger the Moderators...what would you expect?​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I prefer to think of them as indisputable.​

Yes, I know. Like I said, a forum in which everyone agrees is a pretty dull forum.

I was referring to "....Shaman's posts are pretty far off in left field."

I apologize for the humor.

Somebody complained??

​

 

[PLC1]

I was referring to "....Shaman's posts are pretty far off in left field."

I apologize for the humor.

Somebody complained??

​

Never apologize for humor.

Has someone complained? Well, this is from Always' post above:

Yet, we have this RANTING BUSH BASHER named SHAMAN who CONSTANTLY POST his stories calling Bush everything nasty and ole BUNZ never once ever DELETES his GARBAGE.

It seems the complaint is that the left wing (if that's really what Bush bashers are) get a pass, even when we think that their posts are way out in left field as well, while the right wing gets sanctioned unfairly.

At least, that's what I think he means.

He's wrong, of course.

It is insulting other members that will get a member sanctioned, not posting extremist views.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

"He's America's Osama bin Laden -- and we let him go.

Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical Muslim imam who ministered to at least three 9/11 hijackers, the Fort Hood shooter and the crotch-bomber, was taken into custody at JFK Airport on a felony arrest warrant in 2002.

Even though Awlaki had been on the FBI's radar for years, he was let go, most likely because of intervention by Saudi Arabia, classified documents and interviews reveal. Now he continues to train new "martyrs" in Yemen."

*

*