Time For Patience With Iran Finished

[guitarMan]

Sadly, that is about as dumb an assessment as can be concocted.

Libs are rooting for terrorism, always have and always will.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

 

[guitarMan]

[imgal="left"]http://www.thespeculatingmaverick.com/media/Post Images/mahmoud.jpg[/imgal]The deadline for Iran to comply with U.N. Security Council resolution 1696 came and went without incident last Thursday, and now the European Union is granting Iran "two more weeks" in some kind of misguided threat to force Iran to reconsider their stance. Sanctions, the main threat against Iran, seems meaningless. Countries like China, Russia, and Japan see the Islamic Fundamentalist state as a key resource in their future economic plans, and it seems the world cannot come together to work on a plan for dealing with this threat of uranium enrichment.

That Iran is developing weapons-grade uranium is undebatable. The question is whether the world can step in and change things before it is too late. The appeasement policies of Hitler come to mind in dealing with Iran, and no country wanted to take charge and deal with the issue (France, Britain, United States) until it was almost too late. If Iran was candid about their reasons for uranium enrichment they would haven no problems with the IAEA coming into the country and monitoring the safe and peaceful production of nuclear power. Iran has even been offered lucrative energy deals, advanced nuclear technology, and fuel assurances for their reactors, in exchange for the promise of adhering to the NPT. But Iran refuses, all the while supporting Hezbollah in Lebanon, denying the halocaust, blaming the "Zionists" in Israel, and threatening "great harm" if the United States moves to prevent Iran from acquiring their aims.

Clearly it is time for world leaders to come together, put aside economic investments and ties with Iran, and deal with the militant Islamic threat before it becomes greater than they can deal with. To ignore the issue, or to hope that Iran will not pursue a hostile nuclear agenda is as naive as those who believed Hitler would not invade Poland after ceding Czechoslovakia.

Unfortunately what the libs and their media minions don't communicate is that a) Iran sponsors and pays for terrorism and extremism all over the world b) Iran has repeatedly threaten both the United States and Israel that they would annihilate them as soon as they were able to c) Dem presidents have sent them pallet loads of taxpayer cash to help Iran achieve its goal d) Libs would have complained if Iran had attacked the U.S. with nuclear arms and claimed that President Trump should have prevented the attack e) Many Americans have been murdered by Iran and its proxies over the years.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

 

[guitarMan]

View attachment 29757

Right we don't need courts of law or judges, we just need some libs on text message apps to determine guilt or innocence. We could have saved millions of tax dollars if we had disbanded the court system and just asked a liberal if someone was guilty of a crime!

Why it boggles the mind to think of all the money that could be saved!

 

[Phoenix68]

Libs are rooting for terrorism, always have and always will.

.

.
You candy-ass spawn of Loyalists are STILL CRYING AND WHINING???!!!!
.​

"Here we have come to the heart of the matter: terror as policy and method in the American conduct of the revolutionary war. The key here is in the words employed by Lee in speaking of Waxhaws: “bloody,” “war dance,” “roasting fires,” “torture”—the archetype of the Indian as colonials saw him: engaging in cruel and unusual punishment and bloody violence with enjoyment and a shade of barely repressed cannibalism. Our enemy dehumanized (“savage,” “primal”), regressed (as the Enlightenment felt possible) to “Nature” (which many strands of colonial culture, for differing cultural processes, equated with insensate impulse). But we were dehumanized somehow as well, being “sons of the country.” The Indian was inside ourselves and at the same time at our backs. A cause of terror indeed.
.
George Washington, unlike Jefferson who envisioned a fusion with them to produce a distinct, “real,” American, had experience in fighting against Indians and, as “an American gentleman” wrote in a letter to The New Hampshire Gazette in March, 1780, that he felt “an utter aversion to all Indians.” Though on his arrival in Cambridge in July, 1775, to take up the command of the disparate forces spontaneously besieging Boston, he found that the Massachusetts militia included a company of Stockbridge Indians and though he also conferred with representatives of other Indian nations, securing a few allies—and a number of “scouts” who would continue with Continental forces throughout the war (including operations like the Sullivan campaign again the Iroquois in 1779)—Washington very soon adopted a policy of “Indian” terror."

.​

​

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

Unfortunately what the libs and their media minions don't communicate is......

.
The Secret CIA History of the Iran Coup; 1953
.
The Dulles Brothers: How To Wreak Havoc In Guatemala / IRAN
.

.

.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!!
.

.​

 

[guitarMan]

.
View attachment 29920
.
You candy-ass spawn of Loyalists are STILL CRYING AND WHINING???!!!!
.​

"Here we have come to the heart of the matter: terror as policy and method in the American conduct of the revolutionary war. The key here is in the words employed by Lee in speaking of Waxhaws: “bloody,” “war dance,” “roasting fires,” “torture”—the archetype of the Indian as colonials saw him: engaging in cruel and unusual punishment and bloody violence with enjoyment and a shade of barely repressed cannibalism. Our enemy dehumanized (“savage,” “primal”), regressed (as the Enlightenment felt possible) to “Nature” (which many strands of colonial culture, for differing cultural processes, equated with insensate impulse). But we were dehumanized somehow as well, being “sons of the country.” The Indian was inside ourselves and at the same time at our backs. A cause of terror indeed.
.
George Washington, unlike Jefferson who envisioned a fusion with them to produce a distinct, “real,” American, had experience in fighting against Indians and, as “an American gentleman” wrote in a letter to The New Hampshire Gazette in March, 1780, that he felt “an utter aversion to all Indians.” Though on his arrival in Cambridge in July, 1775, to take up the command of the disparate forces spontaneously besieging Boston, he found that the Massachusetts militia included a company of Stockbridge Indians and though he also conferred with representatives of other Indian nations, securing a few allies—and a number of “scouts” who would continue with Continental forces throughout the war (including operations like the Sullivan campaign again the Iroquois in 1779)—Washington very soon adopted a policy of “Indian” terror."

.

.​

Not crying nor whining at all, I think it's GREAT that President Trump is destroying Iran's ability to wage war and spread terrorism. I support the war effort and the dismantling of Iran's ability to terrorize the world.

 

[Phoenix68]

Not crying nor whining at all, I think it's GREAT that President Trump is destroying Iran's ability to wage war and spread terrorism. I support the war effort and the dismantling of Iran's ability to terrorize the world.

.
....@ $3.72 per gallon....for NOW!!
.

.

.​

 

[mark francis]

View attachment 29756

Are we to assume that modern recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize must be Epstein-style pedophiles or Obama-style mass bombers of foreign nations?

Nobel institute seeks explanation of ex-committee chair's Epstein links

The Norwegian Nobel Institute said Wednesday it was awaiting an explanation from Norway's former prime minister Thorbjorn Jagland, a former chair of the

insiderpaper.com

Nobel institute seeks explanation of ex-committee chair’s Epstein links​