US Could Start Bombing Venezuela Within a Few Weeks - A wag the dog special

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
3,902
Spot the difference

1) The US military could start bombing targets inside Venezuela within a matter of weeks, according to a report from NBC News that was published on Saturday.

Sources told NBC that US military officials were drawing up options for striking alleged drug traffickers inside Venezuela, though the report said that so far, no plans have been approved by President Trump.


2) During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, President Clinton ordered missile strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan shortly after the story broke, drawing comparisons with the film and popularizing usage of the phrase. During impeachment proceedings, Clinton also bombed Iraq, drawing stronger "wag the dog" allusion. With the scandal still on the public's mind in March 1999, his administration launched a bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. These action drew more attention to the phrase, growing its popularity.

It has been used multiple times during President Donald Trump's first term. First, in April 2017 when he conducted airstrikes against Syria during an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, and again in January 2020, after a U.S. airstrike assassination of Iran's General Qasem Soleimani occurred during first impeachment trials of former President Trump.



comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
Spot the difference

1) The US military could start bombing targets inside Venezuela within a matter of weeks, according to a report from NBC News that was published on Saturday.

Sources told NBC that US military officials were drawing up options for striking alleged drug traffickers inside Venezuela, though the report said that so far, no plans have been approved by President Trump.


2) During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, President Clinton ordered missile strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan shortly after the story broke, drawing comparisons with the film and popularizing usage of the phrase. During impeachment proceedings, Clinton also bombed Iraq, drawing stronger "wag the dog" allusion. With the scandal still on the public's mind in March 1999, his administration launched a bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. These action drew more attention to the phrase, growing its popularity.

It has been used multiple times during President Donald Trump's first term. First, in April 2017 when he conducted airstrikes against Syria during an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, and again in January 2020, after a U.S. airstrike assassination of Iran's General Qasem Soleimani occurred during first impeachment trials of former President Trump.



comrade stalin
moscow
we cold start bombing russia too ab out as likely to happen
 
Spot the difference

1) The US military could start bombing targets inside Venezuela within a matter of weeks, according to a report from NBC News that was published on Saturday.

Sources told NBC that US military officials were drawing up options for striking alleged drug traffickers inside Venezuela, though the report said that so far, no plans have been approved by President Trump.


2) During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, President Clinton ordered missile strikes in Afghanistan and Sudan shortly after the story broke, drawing comparisons with the film and popularizing usage of the phrase. During impeachment proceedings, Clinton also bombed Iraq, drawing stronger "wag the dog" allusion. With the scandal still on the public's mind in March 1999, his administration launched a bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. These action drew more attention to the phrase, growing its popularity.

It has been used multiple times during President Donald Trump's first term. First, in April 2017 when he conducted airstrikes against Syria during an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, and again in January 2020, after a U.S. airstrike assassination of Iran's General Qasem Soleimani occurred during first impeachment trials of former President Trump.



comrade stalin
moscow
Let Venezuela FAFO and see what happens, like Gaddafi FAFOed that Obama was willing and able to bomb the pants off him with no warning and without congressional or court approval.
 
And lo it doth come to pass - a trifle late but on the date for the Department of Justice to explain its controversial Epstein file redactions.

Obviously the lickspittles around the malignant narcissus are hoping no-one will notice

Next cuba, colombia and nicaragua..again

comrade stalin
moscow
 
And lo it doth come to pass - a trifle late but on the date for the Department of Justice to explain its controversial Epstein file redactions.

Obviously the lickspittles around the malignant narcissus are hoping no-one will notice

Next cuba, colombia and nicaragua..again

comrade stalin
moscow
Democrats claim they would have had damning evidence of Trump's crimes with Epstein if someone had not mysteriously and unexplanedly removed them from the protected files democrats controlled for decades. Why did the democrats not keep those alleged damaging photos of Trump for future release while they had those photos under their control?
 
And lo it doth come to pass - a trifle late but on the date for the Department of Justice to explain its controversial Epstein file redactions.

Obviously the lickspittles around the malignant narcissus are hoping no-one will notice

Next cuba, colombia and nicaragua..again

comrade stalin
moscow
While Russia's Orthodox Church has rootin' tootin' Putin redacting Ukraine here's continuing that USA Papal Cabal business redacting it's WW II Nazi drug business starting with Venezuela while Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate drug trafficking fiefdom continues it's thieving US Constitution Bill of Rights arsonists Godvernment of redacting their SCOTUS Rehnquist "what is 9/11 ?" rhetorical Freudian slip for economic injustice.......
 
Democrats claim they would have had damning evidence of Trump's crimes with Epstein if someone had not mysteriously and unexplanedly removed them from the protected files democrats controlled for decades. Why did the democrats not keep those alleged damaging photos of Trump for future release while they had those photos under their control?

the democrats are not part of this farce

it was the victims who lead the charge..

comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
the democrats are not part of this farce

it was the victims who lead the charge..

comrade stalin
moscow
Democrats filed all sorts of false charges against Trump for years but could not release any incriminating evidence on Trump from the Epstein files in their possession? They never had any damaging info on Trump in the Epstein files.
 
Back
Top