US supporting Al-qaeda in Libya

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
1,759
Oh Dear !!

Was it not only last year the al-qaeda was THE ENEMY.

"..Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited "around 25" men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are "today are on the front lines in Adjabiya".

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters "are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists," but added that the "members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader".

His revelations came even as Idriss Deby Itno, Chad's president, said al-Qaeda had managed to pillage military arsenals in the Libyan rebel zone and acquired arms, "including surface-to-air missiles, which were then smuggled into their sanctuaries".

Mr al-Hasidi admitted he had earlier fought against "the foreign invasion" in Afghanistan, before being "captured in 2002 in Peshwar, in Pakistan". He was later handed over to the US, and then held in Libya before being released in 2008.

US and British government sources said Mr al-Hasidi was a member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG, which killed dozens of Libyan troops in guerrilla attacks around Derna and Benghazi in 1995 and 1996.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html

No wonder the Obama Admin is trying to distance itself from the fray..

Members of this forum, especially those of the conservative, islamic-disliking persuasion are cordially invited to express their opinion on this interesting turn of events

Comrade Stalin of Gori
 
Werbung:
more..

"...The dubious character of the Libyan rebels was further underscored in a remarkable profile published Saturday by the Wall Street Journal of three Libyans who had fought with Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan and were now playing major roles in the rebel military effort. Two of the three had been in US custody as alleged Al Qaeda operatives and one spent six years at Guantanamo Bay before being turned over to the Gaddafi regime in 2007. The three men are:

* Abdel Hakim al-Hasady, described as “an influential Islamic preacher and high school teacher who spent five years at a training camp in eastern Afghanistan” and now “oversees the recruitment, training and deployment of about 300 rebel fighters from Darna,” a city in eastern Libya
* Salah al-Barrani, “a former fighter from the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, or LIFG,” who is Hasady’s field commander
* Sufyan Ben Qumu, “a Libyan army veteran who worked for Osama bin Laden’s holding company in Sudan and later for an al Qaeda-linked charity in Afghanistan,” and who “is training many of the city’s rebel recruits.”

Hasady and Ben Qumu were arrested by Pakistani security after the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and turned over to the US. Hasady was transferred to Libyan custody two months later, while Ben Qumu was moved to Guantanamo and held there until 2007, when he, too, was sent to a Libyan prison. The Gaddafi regime released both men in 2008, at a time when US-Libya collaboration in the “war on terror” was at its height. Such an action would certainly have been checked with Washington.

The former Al Qaeda warrior was quite willing to speak to the leading US business newspaper, which reported, “his discourse has become dramatically more pro-American.” He told the Journal, “If we hated the Americans 100 percent, today it is less than 50 percent. They have started to redeem themselves for their past mistakes.…”

Whether these individuals are Al Qaeda operatives who were “turned” by their American captors or have simply changed allegiance under changed circumstances is unclear. But their role in the Libyan opposition further undermines the longstanding propaganda of the US government about the supposedly unbridgeable gulf between Al Qaeda and American imperialism.


http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/apr2011/liby-a04.shtml

Comrade Stalin
 
No-one seems to want to debate this topic.

Why is that ?

Comrade Stalin of Tripoli
 
I've been saying all along that Obama has been dealing with the devil when he supported the so-called "freedom-fighters" in Egypt, and now he is supporting the same group of terrorists in Libya.

I've also stated that the "end game" in this whole thing is for the Islamo-terrorist organizations to create a terrorist "super-state" by posing as "freedom fighters" and "Democracy-lovers", then toppling all of the regimes in the middle east.
 
I've been saying all along that Obama has been dealing with the devil when he supported the so-called "freedom-fighters" in Egypt, and now he is supporting the same group of terrorists in Libya.

I've also stated that the "end game" in this whole thing is for the Islamo-terrorist organizations to create a terrorist "super-state" by posing as "freedom fighters" and "Democracy-lovers", then toppling all of the regimes in the middle east.

yes of course, no democracy for Muslims because we don't like some groups. Maybe the best way to fight them...is democracy..free speech, and giving the people a better life rather then holding them back, beating them down for wanting human rights, and having the west look like a bunch of hypocrites when we talk about democracy....

new poll shows 46% of republicans in Mississippi want to ban interracial marriage...they are to fundamentalist...ban voting in Mississippi.
 
yes of course, no democracy for Muslims because we don't like some groups. Maybe the best way to fight them...is democracy..free speech, and giving the people a better life rather then holding them back, beating them down for wanting human rights, and having the west look like a bunch of hypocrites when we talk about democracy....


Has anyone said they don't want democracy in the middle east?


Given the choice of a benign dictator who is not a terrorist versus a democratic government that is run by terrorists I think many would favor the dictator.

Though I bet we would all (well mostly) favor the democracy that is not run by terrorists.

At this point I would add that the statists here who favor democracy don't realize that statism leads to dictatorships.
 
yes of course, no democracy for Muslims because we don't like some groups. Maybe the best way to fight them...is democracy..free speech, and giving the people a better life rather then holding them back, beating them down for wanting human rights, and having the west look like a bunch of hypocrites when we talk about democracy....

Notice how the leftwingers when Bush was creating the first arab democracy in iraq could only bleat and whine about (1) invading a sovereign nation and (2) civilian casualties and (3) imposing our system on other people and (4) and attacking a nation that doesn't pose an imminent threat to us (remember that one? :)) have suddenly become born-again advocates of democracy for arabs. :D
 
Al Qaida is US puppet. It plays as a role of false flag. It activate "terror attack" (911) to justify US' war in Mid-east. It riots in Libya to justify a war in Libya to "protect people from Kaddafi".
 
Is George Bush just like Hitler?. Sounds like 9/11 was a conspircy after all. So why now turn Bush over to Switzerland let him face war crimes charges.
 
Notice how the leftwingers when Bush was creating the first arab democracy in iraq could only bleat and whine about (1) invading a sovereign nation and (2) civilian casualties and (3) imposing our system on other people and (4) and attacking a nation that doesn't pose an imminent threat to us (remember that one? :)) have suddenly become born-again advocates of democracy for arabs. :D


Hypocrisy is a virtue to the leftists. They consider hypocrisy to be a badge of honor.
 
Werbung:
bush-hitler.jpg

indybushhitler1.jpg
 
Back
Top