Truth-Bringer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 880
Vince Foster was murdered. There is plenty of evidence to prove a cover up. The details are here.
The main piece of evidence is the handwriting analysis on the "suicide" note that most people have simply never seen. The government says that the park police and the FBI did a handwriting analysis and confirmed the suicide note was Vince Foster's. Problem is, they both only analyzed one piece of writing. That's a violation of all forms of handwriting analysis, not to mention the FBI's own procedures. Also, the park police officer who did their analysis wasn't even trained or qualified to do so!
Yes, the man who paid for private analysis by 3 highly reputable experts was a conservative, but again, compare the experience of the 3 men below with what the park police and the FBI did. Bottom line, if that note was a forgery, that means it had to be murder:
"The fabrication of a "suicide" note by high officials, is just one more indication that Vincent Foster did not commit suicide.
With us today are our expert panel whose reports you have copies of, as well as the torn note, and a set of known documents written by Vincent Foster.
Mr. Reginald E. Alton, from Oxford Univeristy, has flown in for this conference. He is a world-recognized expert on handwriting and manuscript authentication. For 30 years he has lectured at Oxford on handwriting, and has engaged in forensic document examination.
Recently he ruled on the authenticity of C.S. Lewis's Diaries. He has been consulted by British police authorities and has testified in British courts on both criminal and civil matters involving questioned documents.
He has determined the note to be a forgery.
Mr. Vincent Scalice, is formerly a homicide expert with the New York City Police Department. He is a certified Questioned Document Examiner with the American Board of Forensic Examiners. He has 22 years experience as a document examiner, and has worked for some of the country¹s largest institutions in this capacity, for example Citicorp and Chemical Bank.
He has determined the note to be a forgery.
Mr. Ronald Rice has 18 years experience performing civil, criminal and forensic handwriting examination. He is a consultant to the Massachusetts Attorney General's office. He has examined documents on a number of celebrated cases, and recently was asked by CNN to examine notes written by O.J. Simpson.
He too has determined the note to be a forgery.
Three experts--70 years of combined forensic examination experience--conclude forgery.
Both the Park Police and later the FBI determined the note to have been written by Mr. Foster.
But look more closely. The Capitol Police handwriting expert compared the so-called Foster note to only one document--which is not in keeping with a proper and complete examination. We learn today from Mr. Christopher Ruddy, the reporter from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the the Park Police used the services of [a] Sergeant from the Capitol Police who has never been certified as a document examiner.
Later the FBI, and former Special Counsel Robert Fiske reports, found the note to have been written by Foster, again by comparing it to a single document and several checks written by Foster. Like so much of the duplicity in the Fiske report, we learn that the checks proved an inconclusive match to the note. The FBI violated standard forensic procedures to match the document.
Former FBI Director William Sessions has charged that his firing the day before Foster's death led to a "compromised" investigation into the death."
The details of their handwriting analysis reports - which have NEVER been questioned as being inaccurate - are here
The main piece of evidence is the handwriting analysis on the "suicide" note that most people have simply never seen. The government says that the park police and the FBI did a handwriting analysis and confirmed the suicide note was Vince Foster's. Problem is, they both only analyzed one piece of writing. That's a violation of all forms of handwriting analysis, not to mention the FBI's own procedures. Also, the park police officer who did their analysis wasn't even trained or qualified to do so!
Yes, the man who paid for private analysis by 3 highly reputable experts was a conservative, but again, compare the experience of the 3 men below with what the park police and the FBI did. Bottom line, if that note was a forgery, that means it had to be murder:
"The fabrication of a "suicide" note by high officials, is just one more indication that Vincent Foster did not commit suicide.
With us today are our expert panel whose reports you have copies of, as well as the torn note, and a set of known documents written by Vincent Foster.
Mr. Reginald E. Alton, from Oxford Univeristy, has flown in for this conference. He is a world-recognized expert on handwriting and manuscript authentication. For 30 years he has lectured at Oxford on handwriting, and has engaged in forensic document examination.
Recently he ruled on the authenticity of C.S. Lewis's Diaries. He has been consulted by British police authorities and has testified in British courts on both criminal and civil matters involving questioned documents.
He has determined the note to be a forgery.
Mr. Vincent Scalice, is formerly a homicide expert with the New York City Police Department. He is a certified Questioned Document Examiner with the American Board of Forensic Examiners. He has 22 years experience as a document examiner, and has worked for some of the country¹s largest institutions in this capacity, for example Citicorp and Chemical Bank.
He has determined the note to be a forgery.
Mr. Ronald Rice has 18 years experience performing civil, criminal and forensic handwriting examination. He is a consultant to the Massachusetts Attorney General's office. He has examined documents on a number of celebrated cases, and recently was asked by CNN to examine notes written by O.J. Simpson.
He too has determined the note to be a forgery.
Three experts--70 years of combined forensic examination experience--conclude forgery.
Both the Park Police and later the FBI determined the note to have been written by Mr. Foster.
But look more closely. The Capitol Police handwriting expert compared the so-called Foster note to only one document--which is not in keeping with a proper and complete examination. We learn today from Mr. Christopher Ruddy, the reporter from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the the Park Police used the services of [a] Sergeant from the Capitol Police who has never been certified as a document examiner.
Later the FBI, and former Special Counsel Robert Fiske reports, found the note to have been written by Foster, again by comparing it to a single document and several checks written by Foster. Like so much of the duplicity in the Fiske report, we learn that the checks proved an inconclusive match to the note. The FBI violated standard forensic procedures to match the document.
Former FBI Director William Sessions has charged that his firing the day before Foster's death led to a "compromised" investigation into the death."
The details of their handwriting analysis reports - which have NEVER been questioned as being inaccurate - are here
