A new oil find = to ALL the current proven reserves

Pollution and global climate change harms poor people more than wealth ones. They are more often forced to live near polluting factories and industrial waste dumps. They are less likely to be able to afford air conditioning in the summers and heat in the winter.
Big Oil does not give a damn about the planet. It s run by guys who know that they will all be dead before true disaster happens. In the meantime, they like the profits.
In order to 'save the planet' candidate Obama promised to bankrupt coal and drive electric rates upward like a rocket. I don't think he realized how much that was going to hurt poor people struggling to pay their skyrocketing electric bills. I don't favor the moronic assumptions that beating down the poor is necessary in order to save the world from alleged man-made weather changes.
 
Werbung:
Obama did not try to bankrupt coal. The soal deposits do not belong to the government, and there was no way Obama could have harmed the coal industry. He merely said that it was in decline, and that was good, because there would be less pollution.

The reality is that Appalachian coal mines are mined out. Note that Trump promised to bring back Big Coal, saying this by using the words "clean coal" while making washing gestures with his tiny hands.
And Appalachian coal continued to decline during the Trump years.
 
Where was the link wrong
Be specific
The whitewashing and editorial editing of Obama's clear intent still does not change the fact that Obama hit the deck from day one tearing down the US coal industry. Here is a clip from the piece you posted that you had hoped would prove Obama never intended to hurt the coal industry, especially in the midst of the 2008 banking collapse recession:

In other words, Obama was talking about disincentives to building coal-powered plants with old technology, not coal plants with cleaner technology. That’s an important distinction. He is also talking about a hypothetical, not making a “vow” to bankrupt coal operators.


What are his whitewashing editors trying to convince us? That he was only talking about bankrupting new coal plants hoping to build with old technology? That is not what he said at all, but even so, the amended explanation for his war against coal still means he intended to bankrupt old coal companies with old technologies putting millions of Americans out of work at a time when people were suffering the negative effects of the banking collapse of 2008.
 
The whitewashing and editorial editing of Obama's clear intent still does not change the fact that Obama hit the deck from day one tearing down the US coal industry. Here is a clip from the piece you posted that you had hoped would prove Obama never intended to hurt the coal industry, especially in the midst of the 2008 banking collapse recession:

In other words, Obama was talking about disincentives to building coal-powered plants with old technology, not coal plants with cleaner technology. That’s an important distinction. He is also talking about a hypothetical, not making a “vow” to bankrupt coal operators.


What are his whitewashing editors trying to convince us? That he was only talking about bankrupting new coal plants hoping to build with old technology? That is not what he said at all, but even so, the amended explanation for his war against coal still means he intended to bankrupt old coal companies with old technologies putting millions of Americans out of work at a time when people were suffering the negative effects of the banking collapse of 2008.
Bankrupt old plants, not companies
That's capitalism
New processes destroy old ones
 
Bankrupt old plants, not companies
That's capitalism
New processes destroy old ones
I think maybe you have not thought this one out very clearly. Obama said he intended to bankrupt coal companies, whether you want to call them plants, businesses, operations, industries, or whatever. The problem with bankrupting coal companies like that is that such fascist closings would hurt American workers, hurt American businesses, hurt American consumers, and hurt the economy.
 
I think maybe you have not thought this one out very clearly. Obama said he intended to bankrupt coal companies, whether you want to call them plants, businesses, operations, industries, or whatever. The problem with bankrupting coal companies like that is that such fascist closings would hurt American workers, hurt American businesses, hurt American consumers, and hurt the economy.
Plants are not companies
God you are stupid
 
Plants are not companies
God you are stupid
Explain the difference. Did Obama intend to destroy plants but not companies, thus somehow supposedly intending to preserve coal jobs for millions of Americans and preserve low electricity rates for the suffering poor? That is not what he said in the video.
 
Explain the difference. Did Obama intend to destroy plants but not companies, thus somehow supposedly intending to preserve coal jobs for millions of Americans and preserve low electricity rates for the suffering poor? That is not what he said in the video.
Plants are owned by companies
God you are stupid
 
Plants are owned by companies
God you are stupid
Is that what Obama intended? To destroy plants so electric rates would "skyrocket?" Did Obama even have a clue how badly poor people were going to be hurt because of "skyrocketing" energy costs?

1710906752105.jpeg
 
Is that what Obama intended? To destroy plants so electric rates would "skyrocket?" Did Obama even have a clue how badly poor people were going to be hurt because of "skyrocketing" energy costs?

View attachment 12397
He wanted less pollution . Coal plants with better tech duh
Because Pollution is bad
It hurts people and reduces their lives

 
Werbung:
He wanted less pollution . Coal plants with better tech duh
Because Pollution is bad
It hurts people and reduces their lives
I see. So he thought creating hardships on the poor was better for the world than possible risking discomfort for those who have plenty of money?
1710912930612.jpeg

1710914578419.png
 
Back
Top