A longer post. It begins with science and ends at God. I attempted to remain all fact like and so proper but I am tired. Right in the middle I leave facts and start me. My spell checker is not working so near the end? You will be on your own, jerking at all my typos! My mind does that: I hit a typo and I stumble in my head. This is how the universe actually works & reasons most of uniformity. It is not all of it by any means. You can and may 'steal' my intellectual property but if you do, accord me some justice will ya? and give me full credit. It is already patented and copyrighted as I entered it to US Supreme Court in a different form. We named this in Article 1 Section 8. There are too many people to name exactly; I tried to name you if I named your concept. I like talking; I dislike writing anything other than letters. Ready? Mormons and Catholics voluntered too as did Jews as Jews were violated by NY but I chose Buddhists as they exactly said it. They said, we are willing to do this exact thing. Buddhists have volunteered for service. The Dalai Lama was asked what they would do if reincarnation were proven to be false or not actual reality by scientific means and he responded, We would abandon that belief. How simple is that? The belief is actual reality but does it match the universe? If it does not we have an issue and so Buddhists have volunteered as the Issue, Buddhism, specifically a tenet of it known as reincarnation is also the Jurisdiction – Buddhists as their own leader is said to be a reincarnation, isn’t he? Is it then possible to abandon that belief then and still exist? How do you then reason the Dalai Lama and your following him as a leader? Doesn’t abandoning this belief then shake Buddhism down to its very core and destroy it? It is a point of intrinsicity as it is all one and the same. Buddhists have said, via the Dalai Lama, We govern our own beliefs and practices via the application of provable facts. Why, that sounds like a vote and so liberty to me as Buddhists can and will change a belief, formerly held as true and fact, or completely abandon it even, w/o abandoning the faith. I can use science to prove that reincarnation is not actual reality. That what you perceive to be a person returning or coming back again is actually human consciousness, the collective God or universal consciousness, and can be reasoned using physics. I can then prove my reasoning using actual reality. I can use a physical thing in nature and so predict how it will behave then sit back and watch it behave that way. My prediction will be realized just as Einstein’s was and so then it is fact or law. Relativity was merely a theory until Einstein’s prediction regarding an eclipse and light then occurred in nature. I will predict the behavior of the magnetic North Pole as our human consciousness moves it and ethical reasoned decision making affects its speed. Evidence of this would be science has no idea how or why it moves but it is moving and faster all of the time. If you bother to check, the Pole’s movement and speed directly correlates to major legal decisions we have made which result in death. Major events line up with movement and speed such as WWII, Vietnam, Roe V Wade and China’s shift to becoming a capitalist/communist government. It is also retracing the physical human migration journey we took to get here, to North America. It is said it will be in Siberia by 2054 at its current rate of speed and that this will not be harmful. As no living person has witnessed a pole reversal, we do not know this as fact. I noticed this correlation and knew it could not be coincidence. All of this universe is a duality and so I began to ask what is the same and what is different and I named what is physical versus what is metaphysical. Is the Earth related to people? Is anything intrinsic? Is the planet alive? Earth is a dynamo just as a person is. The Earth has a molten iron core and we do too, as we have iron based blood infused tissue. We are warm and we both generate an electromagnetic field around us. A person’s brain produces an electrical current as the Sun does; the strongest type of electromagnetic is an electric current around an iron core. The brain and sun are like batteries, powering us. There is one other noticeable similarity: Each of us is regulated by homeostasis as it happens; we respond to outside influences and injury thus balance ourselves. These fields then must be related and must affect each other. The only difference is the Earth has no emotional reasoning ability and we do so we believe in a Creator; we have a metaphysical center or self and the Earth does not. Or does it, as we seem to control it? Ah, human consciousness or the universal consciousness is the intrinsic thing. The God factor. This then is a force and it must be the intrinsic or creation force as it is creation itself. As it is the creation force people must exhibit this force somehow. Do they? Of course. Max Plank reasoned human consciousness with physics as a twin stream of matter and antimatter. Bruce Cathie confirmed this. There is proof of this force all over as it then reasons the Pyramids, Native Americans causing storms, the laying of hands as having healing properties, cancer suddenly disappearing, our own Revolution, miraculous events, Yogis ceasing bodily functions for days and weeks and prayers being answered. So, if it is all related and if it is intrinsic, and I am correct, then I should be able to run all over the universe, across the entire planet and connect my own person to it all as you should as WE created it. This world was an idea we then gave birth to by acting upon those ideas. People act upon ideas and use emotions as reasoning. Proof? I have seen monkey love, monkey murder, monkey tools and even a monkey practical joke. I have not seen a monkey laugh as a part of a group, as a form of communication; the monkey who played a joke was taken with himself only; others monkeys did not share that joke. I have never seen monkey joy. The other thing I have yet to witness is monkey liberation. Monkeys gather and not once have any of them thought to liberate themselves, then each other, then other species. Go to the National Zoo. If any primate is ever going to do this it will be here and it will be orangutans for these reasons: 1, They are not in cages. They can swing overhead all they want and go across the Zoo; if they chose they could fall to the ground and make a break for it. 2, They see souvenir copies of the Declaration and Constitution constantly. Even if they cannot read they can hear people talking. As of this writing, not one orangutan has begun to aspire or even conspire; not one has been inspired to act. The emotion of liberty is lost on them. 3, The Library of Congress is nearby. So are a few colleges. The variety of subjects discussed by the visitors is broad so even if a monkey cannot grasp liberty, it seems as if they would grasp other ideas thus other emotions if they could. As many foreigners visit this Zoo speaking many languages, it is not a language problem so it must be emotional. Why aren’t they conspiring to make a break for it? Why aren’t two or more monkeys gathering in the name of liberty thus birthing a monkey government and monkey law? 4, Orangutans can do some amazing human-like things. Extremely human-like. There is an entire exhibit devoted to all the amazing things orangutans can do and so do. A lock is no match for an orangutan so we did not bother with one. The lock must be invisible, as within them. 5, If any primate is going to act upon liberty by becoming inspired thus then wonder as he looks to the stars “Who am I and where did I come from?” and so aspire for more or different and do it by acting to be like that higher appellation, his Creator, it will be an orangutan. We created the orangutan as we know it. Darwin was incorrect as we did not come from monkeys; it is the other way around. Darwin used the word Descent as in the descent of man. No, it is the ascent of man as we evolve metaphysically. Adaptation, such as your appendix or skin color, is not evolution. For it to be evolution the thing itself must be changed. Monkeys are like me but I am not like a monkey, as I possess that one difference: Emotional reasoning capacity that makes me have compassion for monkeys. I pray for monkeys; they do not pray for me. I was never a monkey. There is no fossil record of any such thing and although we call it missing and assume it exists it should have been found by now if it existed. It seems as if we did come from monkeys but we did not. Darwin meant relationship by the word ‘descent’ as in one then became another so we descended from and are then related. This then implies a first cause or first thing. It negates any aspiration as in metaphysical ascent and we have proof we ascend – count all the various philosophies across the planet. Examine your own history: I could not buy Clarence Thomas today and so actually own him even if I did have a billion dollars. We have been assuming we came second or much later, after Earth; what if we came first and so created Earth and then monkeys?