Chicken Little Thunberg eats crow

Yes, the sea rises and falls, but decades of sea level rises and falls that have very little effect on the shorelines of coastal Australian towns can hardly be blamed for wiping out islands 500 miles away. Just as the peer-reviewed report suggests, those islands were likely washed away by swirling winds and waves from events like hurricanes.
you are obsessing about coasting australian towns? lol

here ya go, moron. i have facts, you have pictures (like a 2 year old) lol

Sea levels are rising globally and around the Australian coastline and will continue to rise through this century and beyond. Consistent with global increases, sea levels have risen in Australia at an average rate of 2.1 mm/year over the past half century.

Projections of sea-level rise for Australia show that the rate of rise during the 21st century will be greater than over the past four decades for all concentration scenario

Sea-level rise projections for Australian coast by the end of the century are similar to, or slightly larger than (by up to about 6 cm) figures for the global average increase (see Global climate change). The likely estimate of sea-level rise in Australia by 2090 is about 45-82 cm higher than 1986-2005 levels. This figure could be higher if a tipping point is reached in the global system which commits land-based ice sheets, such as the Greenland ice sheet, to irreversible melting

 
Werbung:
Scientists may disagree among themselves and most do, but facts remain and the fact is that global warming alarmism is foolish.

you say it is "foolish" and that is a FACT?

prove it, moron.
but you won't
because you are a fake christian lying oron. lol
 
Notice the fear built into the architecture of that beautiful historic port city situated at near seal level in Australia. That reminds me of rich and famous Democrats who have spent millions of dollars to build magnificent homes on coastal lands at near sea level. They don't seem to believe dire warnings of future catastrophic rises in sea levels. Chalk up the failed predictions of catastrophic rises in seal levels as another failed climate change prediction.

people love the ocean. they are willing to take risks of sea level rise.

your picture doesn't prove anything about science, moron. loll
 
And we're supposed to believe you?
Thats as silly as you believing there's a god without evidence.
You can live your life in fear of death by covid, or death by global warming, or death by unregistered guns, or death by capitalism, but you really should stop living in fear of things that you cannot do anything about, and which will likely never hurt you like you imagine.
 
people love the ocean. they are willing to take risks of sea level rise.

your picture doesn't prove anything about science, moron. loll
We have 100-year-old pictures that show no significant rises in sea levels, but climate change alarmism is based upon assumptions about our climate dating back thousands of years coupled with assumptions about what is expected in the unknown and unobservable near or distant future. That is not science but speculation.
 
you are obsessing about coasting australian towns? lol

here ya go, moron. i have facts, you have pictures (like a 2 year old) lol

Sea levels are rising globally and around the Australian coastline and will continue to rise through this century and beyond. Consistent with global increases, sea levels have risen in Australia at an average rate of 2.1 mm/year over the past half century.

Projections of sea-level rise for Australia show that the rate of rise during the 21st century will be greater than over the past four decades for all concentration scenario

Sea-level rise projections for Australian coast by the end of the century are similar to, or slightly larger than (by up to about 6 cm) figures for the global average increase (see Global climate change). The likely estimate of sea-level rise in Australia by 2090 is about 45-82 cm higher than 1986-2005 levels. This figure could be higher if a tipping point is reached in the global system which commits land-based ice sheets, such as the Greenland ice sheet, to irreversible melting

How do quacks who purport to be climate experts measure seal levels, with yardsticks? We have seen dozens of failed predictions by climate alarmist quacks whose mistake was to make short term predictions, all of which miserably failed. This source claims sea level rises in Australia in the 20th century were around 1.5mm/year. This article does not explain how those numbers were calculated or measured. Nevertheless, the quacks go on to translate that 1.5mm/year figure into a future rise of 1,298mm/year by the year 2100. Good move. Don't make short term predictions that will prove embarrassing when they fail, but make your scary predictions far enough in the future that everyone will have forgotten both the bad assumptions and the quack who made them by the time they miserably fail.

What sea-level rise means for Australia - Curious (science.org.au)HA-LEVEL RISE MEANS FOR AUSTRALIA

What sea-level rise means for Australia

Around 85 per cent of Australia’s population lives close to the coast. Although we generally haven’t built right up to the shoreline, there is a lot of development along estuaries and coastal plains slightly inland from the beach. Many of these coastal plains are lower than the current high tide level, making them vulnerable to extensive flooding with an increase in sea level.

During the 20th century, average global sea level rose around 15 centimetres (150 millimetres). The average rate of sea-level rise was around 1.5 millimetres per year during the 20th century, but this rate increased to around 3 millimetres per year between 1993 and 2016.

Around 86 per cent of Australia’s population lives on or near the coast. Image adapted from: Matt Barrett; CC0

As for the future, under a scenario of low future greenhouse gas emissions, average global sea level is expected to rise by 28–61 centimetres by 2100. This low emission scenario requires a significant and urgent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. For a business-as-usual, high emissions scenario, the most confident prediction is for a rise of 52–98 centimetres, although it could possibly be higher than a metre (100 centimetres) if there is significant instability of the Antarctic ice sheet.
 
you say it is "foolish" and that is a FACT?

prove it, moron.
but you won't
because you are a fake christian lying oron. lol
Let's just say poor Greta had to eat her words when her alarmist climate change predictions miserably failed.
 
How do quacks who purport to be climate experts measure seal levels, with yardsticks? We have seen dozens of failed predictions by climate alarmist quacks whose mistake was to make short term predictions, all of which miserably failed. This source claims sea level rises in Australia in the 20th century were around 1.5mm/year. This article does not explain how those numbers were calculated or measured. Nevertheless, the quacks go on to translate that 1.5mm/year figure into a future rise of 1,298mm/year by the year 2100. Good move. Don't make short term predictions that will prove embarrassing when they fail, but make your scary predictions far enough in the future that everyone will have forgotten both the bad assumptions and the quack who made them by the time they miserably fail.

What sea-level rise means for Australia - Curious (science.org.au)HA-LEVEL RISE MEANS FOR AUSTRALIA

What sea-level rise means for Australia

Around 85 per cent of Australia’s population lives close to the coast. Although we generally haven’t built right up to the shoreline, there is a lot of development along estuaries and coastal plains slightly inland from the beach. Many of these coastal plains are lower than the current high tide level, making them vulnerable to extensive flooding with an increase in sea level.

During the 20th century, average global sea level rose around 15 centimetres (150 millimetres). The average rate of sea-level rise was around 1.5 millimetres per year during the 20th century, but this rate increased to around 3 millimetres per year between 1993 and 2016.

Around 86 per cent of Australia’s population lives on or near the coast. Image adapted from: Matt Barrett; CC0

As for the future, under a scenario of low future greenhouse gas emissions, average global sea level is expected to rise by 28–61 centimetres by 2100. This low emission scenario requires a significant and urgent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. For a business-as-usual, high emissions scenario, the most confident prediction is for a rise of 52–98 centimetres, although it could possibly be higher than a metre (100 centimetres) if there is significant instability of the Antarctic ice sheet.

you don't understand how science works? no surprise.
lol

scientists do science things like measure things with scientific instruments designed for the purposes.
maybe you think they use yardsticks, but then again you are a moron.
 
We have 100-year-old pictures that show no significant rises in sea levels, but climate change alarmism is based upon assumptions about our climate dating back thousands of years coupled with assumptions about what is expected in the unknown and unobservable near or distant future. That is not science but speculation.

which pictures are those that prove no significant rise in sea levels?
post a credible scientific proof of that, moron. lol
 
you don't understand how science works? no surprise.
lol

scientists do science things like measure things with scientific instruments designed for the purposes.
maybe you think they use yardsticks, but then again you are a moron.
How do you think alarmists measure the rises in sea levels? Are they concerned that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans may lose their difference in sea levels?
 
which pictures are those that prove no significant rise in sea levels?
post a credible scientific proof of that, moron. lol
I posted at least one that proved there had been no significant rise in sea level in 100 years. Have you got a photo that demonstrates a sea level rise?
 
I posted at least one that proved there had been no significant rise in sea level in 100 years. Have you got a photo that demonstrates a sea level rise?

which one "proved" it? a random picture with no documentation doesn't prove anything. duh
 
How do you think alarmists measure the rises in sea levels? Are they concerned that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans may lose their difference in sea levels?
i don't know how "alarmists" do anything, moron.
i talk about scientists. duh
 
Werbung:
How do you think alarmists measure the rises in sea levels? Are they concerned that the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans may lose their difference in sea levels?

Measuring sea level​

Sea level is measured by two main methods: tide gauges and satellite altimeters. Tide gauge stations from around the world have measured the daily high and low tides for more than a century, using a variety of manual and automatic sensors. Using data from scores of stations around the world, scientists can calculate a global average and adjust it for seasonal differences. Since the early 1990s, sea level has been measured from space using radar altimeters, which determine the height of the sea surface by measuring the return speed and intensity of a radar pulse directed at the ocean. The higher the sea level, the faster and stronger the return signal is.

here's some information for you moron. lol
 
Back
Top