Great quotes from Presidential candidate Herman Cain

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
Every time I hear this guy, I like him more.

-------------------------------------

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/cain-move-occupy-wall-street-1600-pennsylvania-avenue

(snip)

“When a reporter asked me the other day, well, what do you think about those demonstrations up on Wall Street, I said, first of all, Wall Street didn’t write these failed economic policies -- the White House did,” said Cain.

He then added, “Why don’t you move the demonstrations to the White House?”

“Wall Street didn’t write those failed policies, Wall Street didn’t spend a trillion dollars,” said Cain. “Wall Street isn’t asking to spend another $450 billion. It didn’t work with a trillion. It’s not gonna’ work with $450 billion. You can demonstrate all you want on Wall Street. The problem is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue!”

Cain also quoted the Declaration of Independence, stating that “it is the right of the people to alter and to abolish” the government. “We’ve got some altering and abolishing to do!” he said.

--------------------------------------

I couldn't agree more. And for me, that's saying something.
 
Werbung:
"White folks greed runs a world in need." - Obama

Bet you loved that one. :rolleyes:

but of course your smart enough to know ...that was him quoting someone..not him saying it right? Cain was useing his own words , also it was just a month or 2 ago... Not quoting someone, talking about a sermon from before..talking about a Painting....Sorry did Context hurt your quote?

But of course if you watched Fox news, Hannity...you would think Obama just said it. Because you know, he has a Deep Seeded hatred of white people...Not that he dislikes white people of course.....
 
but of course your smart enough to know ...that was him quoting someone..not him saying it right? Cain was useing his own words , also it was just a month or 2 ago... Not quoting someone, talking about a sermon from before..talking about a Painting....Sorry did Context hurt your quote?

But of course if you watched Fox news, Hannity...you would think Obama just said it. Because you know, he has a Deep Seeded hatred of white people...Not that he dislikes white people of course.....

My point was that politicians often say stupid things, I could have pointed out Obama's quote about 57 states (or any number of other idiotic things he's said), but you probably think there really are 57 states, so I doubt you would have understood the point I was making.

But when a Conservative says something stupid and then appologizes for their statements, that doesn't count... Right? Of course, listening to MSNBC you probably aren't even aware of Cain having gone to speak with a leader of the Muslim community and appologizing for his statements.
 
My point was that politicians often say stupid things, I could have pointed out Obama's quote about 57 states (or any number of other idiotic things he's said), but you probably think there really are 57 states, so I doubt you would have understood the point I was making.

But when a Conservative says something stupid and then appologizes for their statements, that doesn't count... Right? Of course, listening to MSNBC you probably aren't even aware of Cain having gone to speak with a leader of the Muslim community and appologizing for his statements.

Cain did not have a slip of the tongue...he was not misquoted..Not sure why you even think they are the same issue here. Cain said what he believed, he repeated it, be stood by it...and you bring up a misstatement and something taken out of context for the sole reason of attacking Obama...

Its sad if you don't see the difference...but maybe you just don't want to. Or maybe your just kinda sad, got busted for quoting Obama...and did not even know the context or that he was Quoting someone else...and are just trying to hide it.
 
(inaccurately)

(as usual)


You lose.

(as usual)

how dumb do you have to be to say something paraphrased was not accurate...when it was repeated over and over...by him.

Cain Stated he would not hire a Muslim
Cain Stated they should have to take special loyalty Oaths
Cain was against them having the right to build a church..

what do you call that if not a attack on there rights, and there Religion. But I know its ok, Republicans want freedom of Religion...so long as its there religion.
 
so you did not watch the debates I take it....

Herman Cain Apologizes To Muslim-Americans | After saying he wouldn’t appoint Muslims to his cabinet and saying that communities have the right to ban mosques, presidential candidate Herman Cain apologized to Muslim-Americans today in a statement to TPM, saying he was “truly sorry” for potentially violating the freedom of religion guaranteed in the Constitution:

“While I stand by my opposition to the interference of shariah law into the American legal system, I remain humble and contrite for any statements I have made that might have caused offense to Muslim Americans and their friends,” he said in the statement. “I am truly sorry for any comments that may have betrayed my commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the freedom of religion guaranteed by it.”
- ThinkProgress
I intentionally found this article on a Progressive website so that you can't dismiss it as false propaganda from FOX.

So, Pocket, are you going to continue to pretend that Cain never appologized for his comments, that he never reversed his position on the subject? I doubt it... You already knew Cain appologized and reversed himself and yet you have continued to lie by omission. I see no reason, even after your lies have been made obvious, that you would stop now.
 
Werbung:
Little POS doesn't say thing he believes are true.

He says things he believes he can convince others are true. Even if he knows they are false.

The goal isn't to promote the truth. It's to promote big-government liberal socialism, by any means at hand.

Josef Stalin said it best, back in the day when defending his own brand of big-govt socialism: "The truth is whatever serves the Soviet Union!"

Present-day liberal socialists' tactics are little different... as are their goals.
 
Back
Top