Stacey Abrams' group loses court challenge to the 2020 runoff election in Georgia

[mark francis]

The wheels of justice move slowly but surely. True the Vote challenged the eligibility of thousands of Democrat votes in the 2020 runoff and won, and that is just one of tens of thousands of other pending lawsuit challenges by the patriotic American group investigating voting fraud in the US.

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat (msn.com)

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat© Provided by State Of The Union

True the Vote, an election integrity group, won a legal battle against Fair Fight Action, backed by Stacey Abrams.

A federal judge ruled that True the Vote’s mass challenges of Georgia voters’ eligibility did not constitute illegal voter intimidation.

The challenges were made before the 2021 runoffs, which Democrats won, giving them control of the Senate. ...

Consistent Democrat denials of fraud and obstructions to voter fraud investigations and exposure is beginning to show cracks at the seams.

True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation.

“Today’s ruling sends a clear message to those who would attempt to control the course of our nation through lawfare and intimidation. American citizens will not be silenced,” said Engelbrecht.

The case has implications for voter challenge laws in Georgia, where conservative activists have filed over 100,000 more challenges.

 

[Boris Norris]

The wheels of justice move slowly but surely. True the Vote challenged the eligibility of thousands of Democrat votes in the 2020 runoff and won, and that is just one of tens of thousands of other pending lawsuit challenges by the patriotic American group investigating voting fraud in the US.

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat (msn.com)

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat© Provided by State Of The Union

True the Vote, an election integrity group, won a legal battle against Fair Fight Action, backed by Stacey Abrams.

A federal judge ruled that True the Vote’s mass challenges of Georgia voters’ eligibility did not constitute illegal voter intimidation.

The challenges were made before the 2021 runoffs, which Democrats won, giving them control of the Senate. ...

Consistent Democrat denials of fraud and obstructions to voter fraud investigations and exposure is beginning to show cracks at the seams.

True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation.

“Today’s ruling sends a clear message to those who would attempt to control the course of our nation through lawfare and intimidation. American citizens will not be silenced,” said Engelbrecht.

The case has implications for voter challenge laws in Georgia, where conservative activists have filed over 100,000 more challenges.

Who tried to stop the votes in the first place

 

[pjmret]

The wheels of justice move slowly but surely. True the Vote challenged the eligibility of thousands of Democrat votes in the 2020 runoff and won, and that is just one of tens of thousands of other pending lawsuit challenges by the patriotic American group investigating voting fraud in the US.

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat (msn.com)

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat

US District Judge Criticizes Left-Wing Election Advocacy Group In Their Defeat© Provided by State Of The Union

True the Vote, an election integrity group, won a legal battle against Fair Fight Action, backed by Stacey Abrams.

A federal judge ruled that True the Vote’s mass challenges of Georgia voters’ eligibility did not constitute illegal voter intimidation.

The challenges were made before the 2021 runoffs, which Democrats won, giving them control of the Senate. ...

Consistent Democrat denials of fraud and obstructions to voter fraud investigations and exposure is beginning to show cracks at the seams.

True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation.

“Today’s ruling sends a clear message to those who would attempt to control the course of our nation through lawfare and intimidation. American citizens will not be silenced,” said Engelbrecht.

The case has implications for voter challenge laws in Georgia, where conservative activists have filed over 100,000 more challenges.

you keep posting that like it means something important. they didn't win at challenging votes, just the right to challenge them. duh.

how many votes were throw out as a result of this ruling?

how many votes were thrown out period from the 2020 election from all your court challenges?

 

[Boris Norris]

Who tried to stop the votes in the first place

Was it those republicans? Nooooooo. They wouldn't do it.

 

[mark francis]

you keep posting that like it means something important. they didn't win at challenging votes, just the right to challenge them. duh.

how many votes were throw out as a result of this ruling?

how many votes were thrown out period from the 2020 election from all your court challenges?

You bring up a good point. Nobody has proven the evidence wrong, and this is the evidence:

True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24

Texas-based True the Vote, its founder Catherine Engelbrecht, and several others had raised questions about whether 364,000 Georgia voters were improperly registered because their voter registrations conflicted with their mailing addresses.

364,000 unverified ballots seems a lot compared to the measly 12,000 votes the Democrats claim make Trump a seditionist for challenging.

 

[mark francis]

Was it those republicans? Nooooooo. They wouldn't do it.

Republicans and other concerned Americans are taking the evidence from investigations and are now filing lawsuits for the evidence to be examined in open court.

True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24

True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation.

The case has implications for voter challenge laws in Georgia, where conservative activists have filed over 100,000 more challenges.

 

[pjmret]

You bring up a good point. Nobody has proven the evidence wrong, and this is the evidence:

True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24

Texas-based True the Vote, its founder Catherine Engelbrecht, and several others had raised questions about whether 364,000 Georgia voters were improperly registered because their voter registrations conflicted with their mailing addresses.

364,000 unverified ballots seems a lot compared to the measly 12,000 votes the Democrats claim make Trump a seditionist for challenging.

You morons never prove your so called evidence of fraud lol
Which is why you lost every fraud court case

 

[pjmret]

Republicans and other concerned Americans are taking the evidence from investigations and are now filing lawsuits for the evidence to be examined in open court.

True the Vote Wins Federal Election Lawsuit in Georgia | NTD 1-2-24

True the Vote’s founder, Catherine Engelbrecht, hailed the ruling as a vindication against lawfare and intimidation.

The case has implications for voter challenge laws in Georgia, where conservative activists have filed over 100,000 more challenges.

Let me know when you morons actually prove fraud in court lol

 

[mark francis]

You morons never prove your so called evidence of fraud lol
Which is why you lost every fraud court case

The need to provide the evidence has already been met. All that remains is for the evidence to be examined and its validity to be proven or disproven.

 

[pjmret]

The need to provide the evidence has already been met. All that remains is for the evidence to be examined and its validity to be proven or disproven.

Yes and you morons need to prove it duh no one needs to disprove your claims duh
God you are such a legal moron lol

 

[mark francis]

Yes and you morons need to prove it duh no one needs to disprove your claims duh
God you are such a legal moron lol

Cops don't just ignore criminal evidence without investigating and neither should we allow Democrats to claim voting fraud evidence does not need to be investigated to determine whether it is legitimate or not.

 

[pjmret]

Cops don't just ignore criminal evidence without investigating and neither should we allow Democrats to claim voting fraud evidence does not need to be investigated to determine whether it is legitimate or not.

Investigate all you want duh
But cops don't waste time on whiners whose feelings are hurt because they lost
They need credible evidence which judges ruled you don't have lol

 

[mark francis]

Investigate all you want duh
But cops don't waste time on whiners whose feelings are hurt because they lost
They need credible evidence which judges ruled you don't have lol

Democrats mock millions of Americans who demand investigations into evidence of voting fraud instead of dismissals of the evidence without investigations.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats mock millions of Americans who demand investigations into evidence of voting fraud instead of dismissals of the evidence without investigations.

When you lose 60 court cases in a row and still 8nsist you are right you deserve to be mocked for your antiamerican lies

 

[mark francis]

When you lose 60 court cases in a row and still 8nsist you are right you deserve to be mocked for your antiamerican lies

60 courts may have said: 'We will not examine voting fraud evidence and we will not take voting fraud cases in our court' is not proof that Democrats did not commit massive voting fraud in 2020. Democrats are lying when they try to deceive Americans into believing the stupid claim or suggestion that courts proved little or no fraud occurred.