Production of H2onE2 University Second Life virtual campus http://slurl.com/secondlife/Chief/187/166/103
Soldiers, politicians and the Holy Church all declare war to be an abomination and yet two global wars were fought in the last century and many conflicts since, some deliberately escalated. At first glance, it would appear that war is fought for two reasons defense or conquest. If this holds true than every military engagement can be quantified as either defensive or offensive. The problem with attempting to explain every military operation as either defensive or offensive comes with three major issues. The repetitive military mistakes and blunders, successive attempts at defending an un-supply-able position and the full implementation of a physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaign of escalation designed to enrage resistance and empower an insurgence.
The third factor of war will be termed escalation and this can be explained as neither defensive nor offensive. At least, not under the current understanding of strategic warfare, so a new mold must be cast and forged to illustrate why escalation is politically executed. A defensive or offensive struggle fits into a rational model of either cultural growth or survival, but escalation of war is not human, or humanely logical. It would be easy to say escalation requires more military arms, supplies and weapons, which it most certainly will, but this is not the only benefit escalation could provide a country with a closed or locked political system.
Here an investigation must be made to uncover if escalation of warfare, repetitive military mistakes, successive attempts at defending an un-supply-able position and the full implementation of a physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaign has a motive that can be delineated. All historical cases of escalation appear to place more troops into a definable Kill Zone. Hence, is there a political motive to kill off a countries natural born and military trained warrior population?
War strategy is implemented for three purposes offense, defense and escalation. Executing war policy for the solely purpose of escalation can only be explained to increase arms sales and, or kill off soldiers. Every population produces some natural born warriors; people that are born hunters and others which are passive gatherers. If the political machine does not address the hunters or warriors, they will eventually demand to be included into the political system. This is a major problem for the ruling elite, which is currently implementing a two part good cop, bad cop political pyramid scheme.
The two party system in the United States and throughout most proclaimed democracies feeds off each other in a partnership design to sell the public a government but to completely control the system and economically repress the population. The thing about good cop, bad cop politics is you end up with no cop at all, no justice and no representation. However this is the true design and function of the current two party political system. The group that would challenge this system are the hunters, natural born warriors or fighters, so placing them into a military Kill Zone might be a political method to maintain control over the society. Therefore kill alpha and farm passive.
Here and now we will cover repeated, intentional military blunders, which will include the recurring implementation of the classic “Göring air bridge". In addition there exists a need to explain the physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaigns, which escalate war. The Iraq Abu Ghraib prison pictures are a good example to a PPM campaign and the results of such an event need to be scrutinized. Note to the world, nothing gets out of a military prison unless it is released by the Red Cross/Crescent or as an organized planned media campaign. And, the pictures from Abu Ghraib prison can only be explained through a policy of escalation.
The Creation of the World of Sheeple
Escalation of military war is a strategic political solution to address the problem of farming its population. What essentially is taking place is the weeding out of the bad eggs, the strong alpha population, so the spineless, weak-willed lower class can be economically depressed. This is not a final solution but a continual solution to a problem that needs to be addressed for each successive generation. The system is empowered by the controlling elite and the corruptible, justified by the media and heroized by bloodless John Wayne type movies.
Every society produces four classes of people a wealthy ruling elite class, determined to maintain control. Next, a small educated group that empowers the ruling elite and provides substandard education and a phony media, twisted with Homeric and Sacrificial messages. The last two classes of people come from the main population and include the sheeple slave working class and warriors. War is designed, negotiated and implemented with the sole purpose of purging the warrior class, the ones who would, and will challenge the ruling elite for part ownership in the government. The following justification will be based on physical evidence. Wars and conflicts will be researched to confirm that the world’s political systems maintain control through Genocide, intentionally farming a distinct population class.
Example 1 WWI
World War I occurred between 1914 and 1918 and was sold as the War to End All Wars. The event involved a global military conflict that entangled the majority of the world's largest political powers. The war assembled into two opposing alliances the Allied Powers and the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy. More than 70 million military personnel were mobilized in the largest wars in recorded history. The main opponents descended into a state of total war, thrusting their entire scientific and industrial capabilities into the war effort. More than 15 million people were killed, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.
At the end of WWI just one hour from the ceasefire the USA and British military sent waves of troops on frontal assaults of fortified German machine gun posts entrenched in the high ground or separated by cold rivers. The official number of dead of the final day cannot be trusted but are listed as 3,000 Americans and 2,000 British Common Wealth soldiers. These warriors died in the last hours of WWI even though every commander knew the war would be over that day. In fact one account has German soldiers that were manning the machine guns, pleading with the attacking Allied Powers soldiers to stop, for the war is about to end.
“The Last Day of World War One” was presented as a Timewatch series by the BBC where Michael Edward Palin tells the story of how the First World War ends and covers the final casualties. At 5:10 am 11th, 11, 1918 the two parties signed the Armistead and the news was sent around the world; hostilities would cease at 11:00 am.
Michael Palin explains that nearly 11,000 soldiers died that final day before the 11am Armistice. This number does not include the deaths caused that day from received injuries. World War One had a whole generation of men just disappearing, the numbers are shocking, the cemeteries in northern France unbearably moving. The soldiers in France are buried in rank and file, and walking between the graves, provides a feeling of being in the middle of a dead army.
http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/casualties_of_war.htm
The deaths which occurred on the last days of World War One cannot be explained as having an offensive or defensive aim. Here an unnecessary escalation of war can be unveiled. Although, it cannot be attributed to satisfying a motive to exclusively increase military arms sales. The only way to explain sending 11,000 men to their deaths, for no reason on the last day, final hour and up to the last minutes of World War One is to purge the population of its trained and battle hardened warriors.
Following WWI the American government was challenged by the surviving veterans, which camped on the DC State Capital in tent cities and demanded payment of a promised war bonus. It appears now that the American and British governments had made a correlation between who will cause them future problems and who needs to be physically eliminated. The following century continued on the same course, a future that manipulated created wars as a tool so the ruling elite and corruptible can sustain, economic and political control.
Soldiers, politicians and the Holy Church all declare war to be an abomination and yet two global wars were fought in the last century and many conflicts since, some deliberately escalated. At first glance, it would appear that war is fought for two reasons defense or conquest. If this holds true than every military engagement can be quantified as either defensive or offensive. The problem with attempting to explain every military operation as either defensive or offensive comes with three major issues. The repetitive military mistakes and blunders, successive attempts at defending an un-supply-able position and the full implementation of a physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaign of escalation designed to enrage resistance and empower an insurgence.
The third factor of war will be termed escalation and this can be explained as neither defensive nor offensive. At least, not under the current understanding of strategic warfare, so a new mold must be cast and forged to illustrate why escalation is politically executed. A defensive or offensive struggle fits into a rational model of either cultural growth or survival, but escalation of war is not human, or humanely logical. It would be easy to say escalation requires more military arms, supplies and weapons, which it most certainly will, but this is not the only benefit escalation could provide a country with a closed or locked political system.
Here an investigation must be made to uncover if escalation of warfare, repetitive military mistakes, successive attempts at defending an un-supply-able position and the full implementation of a physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaign has a motive that can be delineated. All historical cases of escalation appear to place more troops into a definable Kill Zone. Hence, is there a political motive to kill off a countries natural born and military trained warrior population?
War strategy is implemented for three purposes offense, defense and escalation. Executing war policy for the solely purpose of escalation can only be explained to increase arms sales and, or kill off soldiers. Every population produces some natural born warriors; people that are born hunters and others which are passive gatherers. If the political machine does not address the hunters or warriors, they will eventually demand to be included into the political system. This is a major problem for the ruling elite, which is currently implementing a two part good cop, bad cop political pyramid scheme.
The two party system in the United States and throughout most proclaimed democracies feeds off each other in a partnership design to sell the public a government but to completely control the system and economically repress the population. The thing about good cop, bad cop politics is you end up with no cop at all, no justice and no representation. However this is the true design and function of the current two party political system. The group that would challenge this system are the hunters, natural born warriors or fighters, so placing them into a military Kill Zone might be a political method to maintain control over the society. Therefore kill alpha and farm passive.
Here and now we will cover repeated, intentional military blunders, which will include the recurring implementation of the classic “Göring air bridge". In addition there exists a need to explain the physical, psychological and media (PPM) driven campaigns, which escalate war. The Iraq Abu Ghraib prison pictures are a good example to a PPM campaign and the results of such an event need to be scrutinized. Note to the world, nothing gets out of a military prison unless it is released by the Red Cross/Crescent or as an organized planned media campaign. And, the pictures from Abu Ghraib prison can only be explained through a policy of escalation.
The Creation of the World of Sheeple
Escalation of military war is a strategic political solution to address the problem of farming its population. What essentially is taking place is the weeding out of the bad eggs, the strong alpha population, so the spineless, weak-willed lower class can be economically depressed. This is not a final solution but a continual solution to a problem that needs to be addressed for each successive generation. The system is empowered by the controlling elite and the corruptible, justified by the media and heroized by bloodless John Wayne type movies.
Every society produces four classes of people a wealthy ruling elite class, determined to maintain control. Next, a small educated group that empowers the ruling elite and provides substandard education and a phony media, twisted with Homeric and Sacrificial messages. The last two classes of people come from the main population and include the sheeple slave working class and warriors. War is designed, negotiated and implemented with the sole purpose of purging the warrior class, the ones who would, and will challenge the ruling elite for part ownership in the government. The following justification will be based on physical evidence. Wars and conflicts will be researched to confirm that the world’s political systems maintain control through Genocide, intentionally farming a distinct population class.
Example 1 WWI
World War I occurred between 1914 and 1918 and was sold as the War to End All Wars. The event involved a global military conflict that entangled the majority of the world's largest political powers. The war assembled into two opposing alliances the Allied Powers and the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria–Hungary, and Italy. More than 70 million military personnel were mobilized in the largest wars in recorded history. The main opponents descended into a state of total war, thrusting their entire scientific and industrial capabilities into the war effort. More than 15 million people were killed, making it one of the deadliest conflicts in history.
At the end of WWI just one hour from the ceasefire the USA and British military sent waves of troops on frontal assaults of fortified German machine gun posts entrenched in the high ground or separated by cold rivers. The official number of dead of the final day cannot be trusted but are listed as 3,000 Americans and 2,000 British Common Wealth soldiers. These warriors died in the last hours of WWI even though every commander knew the war would be over that day. In fact one account has German soldiers that were manning the machine guns, pleading with the attacking Allied Powers soldiers to stop, for the war is about to end.
“The Last Day of World War One” was presented as a Timewatch series by the BBC where Michael Edward Palin tells the story of how the First World War ends and covers the final casualties. At 5:10 am 11th, 11, 1918 the two parties signed the Armistead and the news was sent around the world; hostilities would cease at 11:00 am.
Michael Palin explains that nearly 11,000 soldiers died that final day before the 11am Armistice. This number does not include the deaths caused that day from received injuries. World War One had a whole generation of men just disappearing, the numbers are shocking, the cemeteries in northern France unbearably moving. The soldiers in France are buried in rank and file, and walking between the graves, provides a feeling of being in the middle of a dead army.
http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/casualties_of_war.htm
The deaths which occurred on the last days of World War One cannot be explained as having an offensive or defensive aim. Here an unnecessary escalation of war can be unveiled. Although, it cannot be attributed to satisfying a motive to exclusively increase military arms sales. The only way to explain sending 11,000 men to their deaths, for no reason on the last day, final hour and up to the last minutes of World War One is to purge the population of its trained and battle hardened warriors.
Following WWI the American government was challenged by the surviving veterans, which camped on the DC State Capital in tent cities and demanded payment of a promised war bonus. It appears now that the American and British governments had made a correlation between who will cause them future problems and who needs to be physically eliminated. The following century continued on the same course, a future that manipulated created wars as a tool so the ruling elite and corruptible can sustain, economic and political control.