What is Biden going to do to these Americans, arrest them and seize their bank accounts?

You believe by faith without evidence
No. I'm leaning towards what science is investigating. Unlike you who think you know but have no evidence at all, investigation or not. The good book says so. ,,đź–•
that the universe big banged into existence by some unexplainable miracle
Not a miracle. That's a god thing and is any oxymoron when ci.oared to science.
of some sort caused by some unknown force of some kind that, regardless of what that force may have been, was not God.

Yes. At this stage science has said many times, we don't know but the information available tells us everything in the universe came from one source, including life. Call.it the big bang if you want.

The point here is your religion offers no plausible explanation other " god did it". Fuck off old man. You're brain dead.
 
Werbung:
No. I'm leaning towards what science is investigating. Unlike you who think you know but have no evidence at all, investigation or not. The good book says so. ,,đź–•

Not a miracle. That's a god thing and is any oxymoron when ci.oared to science.
You reject the idea that God created the universe and life on earth but are willing to join Richard Dawkins and other rebels against God to accept the possibility that aliens were involved. Here is a news flash: Belief in aliens is blind faith that has nothing whatsoever to do with scientific facts.
Yes. At this stage science has said many times, we don't know but the information available tells us everything in the universe came from one source, including life. Call.it the big bang if you want.

The point here is your religion offers no plausible explanation other " god did it". Fuck off old man. You're brain dead.
I get it. You want God and Christians to "f-off." Science does not struggle to understand the facts, but mentally handicapped unbelievers struggle to find some scientific way to explain the miracle of creation that can be explained without God. Secularist unbelievers are ever learning but never able to arrive at the truth.


2 Timothy 3:7
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
 
You reject the idea that God created the universe and life on earth but are willing to join Richard Dawkins and other rebels against God to accept the possibility that aliens were involved. Here is a news flash: Belief in aliens is blind faith that has nothing whatsoever to do with scientific facts.

I get it. You want God and Christians to "f-off." Science does not struggle to understand the facts, but mentally handicapped unbelievers struggle to find some scientific way to explain the miracle of creation that can be explained without God. Secularist unbelievers are ever learning but never able to arrive at the truth.


2 Timothy 3:7
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
Dawkins has never said aliens were involved you liar. By definition god must be an alien as it doesn't live in this planet.

There's no miracle of creation. The only miracle ever witnessed is how religion miraculously got billions of low IQ people to believe it.
 
Dawkins has never said aliens were involved you liar. By definition god must be an alien as it doesn't live in this planet.

There's no miracle of creation. The only miracle ever witnessed is how religion miraculously got billions of low IQ people to believe it.


Is the “Science” of Richard Dawkins Science Fiction?

JONATHAN WELLS APRIL 21, 2008 INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Atheist Richard Dawkins is hopping mad at the makers of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Dawkins accuses the filmmakers of “lying for Jesus” because they make it seem that he believes in intelligent design and space aliens.

Dawkins is an outspoken critic of intelligent design (ID). In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins defined biology as “the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Design is only an appearance, because (as the subtitle of the book indicated) “the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design.” According to Dawkins, evolution shows that the universe and everything in it can be explained by undirected natural processes such as random mutation and survival of the fittest. By ruling out design, “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”

According to intelligent design, however, it is possible to infer from evidence in nature that some features of the world and of living things are better explained by an intelligent cause than by undirected natural processes. Although ID says nothing about the nature of the designer (other than calling it intelligent), it leaves open the possibility that the designer is God.

Clearly, Darwinian evolution and intelligent design have different implications for God’s existence.

Surprisingly, in a lengthy interview with Ben Stein in Expelled, Dawkins says that living things on the Earth could be actually (and not just apparently) designed — and that the design might be detectable. Dawkins thereby concedes the central claim of ID, though he insists that the designers — if there were any — must have been highly evolved space aliens, not God.
 

Is the “Science” of Richard Dawkins Science Fiction?

JONATHAN WELLS APRIL 21, 2008 INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Atheist Richard Dawkins is hopping mad at the makers of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Dawkins accuses the filmmakers of “lying for Jesus” because they make it seem that he believes in intelligent design and space aliens.

Dawkins is an outspoken critic of intelligent design (ID). In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins defined biology as “the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Design is only an appearance, because (as the subtitle of the book indicated) “the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design.” According to Dawkins, evolution shows that the universe and everything in it can be explained by undirected natural processes such as random mutation and survival of the fittest. By ruling out design, “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”

According to intelligent design, however, it is possible to infer from evidence in nature that some features of the world and of living things are better explained by an intelligent cause than by undirected natural processes. Although ID says nothing about the nature of the designer (other than calling it intelligent), it leaves open the possibility that the designer is God.

Clearly, Darwinian evolution and intelligent design have different implications for God’s existence.

Surprisingly, in a lengthy interview with Ben Stein in Expelled, Dawkins says that living things on the Earth could be actually (and not just apparently) designed — and that the design might be detectable. Dawkins thereby concedes the central claim of ID, though he insists that the designers — if there were any — must have been highly evolved space aliens, not God.

Is the “Science” of Richard Dawkins Science Fiction?

JONATHAN WELLS APRIL 21, 2008 INTELLIGENT DESIGN
Atheist Richard Dawkins is hopping mad at the makers of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. Dawkins accuses the filmmakers of “lying for Jesus” because they make it seem that he believes in intelligent design and space aliens.

Dawkins is an outspoken critic of intelligent design (ID). In his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins defined biology as “the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” Design is only an appearance, because (as the subtitle of the book indicated) “the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design.” According to Dawkins, evolution shows that the universe and everything in it can be explained by undirected natural processes such as random mutation and survival of the fittest. By ruling out design, “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”

According to intelligent design, however, it is possible to infer from evidence in nature that some features of the world and of living things are better explained by an intelligent cause than by undirected natural processes. Although ID says nothing about the nature of the designer (other than calling it intelligent), it leaves open the possibility that the designer is God.

Clearly, Darwinian evolution and intelligent design have different implications for God’s existence.

Surprisingly, in a lengthy interview with Ben Stein in Expelled, Dawkins says that living things on the Earth could be actually (and not just apparently) designed — and that the design might be detectable. Dawkins thereby concedes the central claim of ID, though he insists that the designers — if there were any — must have been highly evolved space aliens, not God.
If you weren't so idiotic, you would see he was making the comparison of intelligent design not being done by some silly god but super intelligent aliens.
He made no such claim he believed in aliens. You're a liar. You should read more
 
If you weren't so idiotic, you would see he was making the comparison of intelligent design not being done by some silly god but super intelligent aliens.
He made no such claim he believed in aliens. You're a liar. You should read more
Explain his twisted reasoning to your friends. I recognize a quack when I hear one.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top