What is the point of angels?

[Dawkinsrocks]

Would someone explain to me why an omnipotent god needs angels?

And also, how do they fly?

It is pretty obvious that a human body does not have the musculature to flap wings fast enough for flight so how does it work?

 

[dogtowner]

what is the point of atheists ?

 

[GenSeneca]

what is the point of atheists ?

Atheist - Has no beliefs pertaining to the existence (or non existence) of God.
Theist - Believes God exists.
Anti-Theist - Believes God does not exist.
Agnostic - A person who holds neither of two opposing positions on a topic.

So what does that have to do with Angels? It's logic...

Let's start with a logical fallacy to serve as the premise of our logic - Negative proof fallacy

Fact - There is no hard, physical, scientific proof that God exists.
Fallacy - The inability to prove the existence is seen as proof that God does not exist.
Fallacious Conclusion - Since God does not exist, then neither do Angels or Devils.

I believe that to be the "point" D was trying to make.

 

[dogtowner]

Atheist - Has no beliefs pertaining to the existence (or non existence) of God.
Theist - Believes God exists.
Anti-Theist - Believes God does not exist.
Agnostic - A person who holds neither of two opposing positions on a topic.

So what does that have to do with Angels? It's logic...

Let's start with a logical fallacy to serve as the premise of our logic - Negative proof fallacy

Fact - There is no hard, physical, scientific proof that God exists.
Fallacy - The inability to prove the existence is seen as proof that God does not exist.
Fallacious Conclusion - Since God does not exist, then neither do Angels or Devils.

I believe that to be the "point" D was trying to make.

definitions are accurate of course but why is the assumption that a thing has a point ?

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

Atheist - Has no beliefs pertaining to the existence (or non existence) of God.
Theist - Believes God exists.
Anti-Theist - Believes God does not exist.
Agnostic - A person who holds neither of two opposing positions on a topic.

So what does that have to do with Angels? It's logic...

Let's start with a logical fallacy to serve as the premise of our logic - Negative proof fallacy

Fact - There is no hard, physical, scientific proof that God exists.
Fallacy - The inability to prove the existence is seen as proof that God does not exist.
Fallacious Conclusion - Since God does not exist, then neither do Angels or Devils.

I believe that to be the "point" D was trying to make.

Cringeworthy

Christians depend on the fact that you can't prove god doesn't exist

But in the cerebral world the onus is on proof of existence

That is why none of you has answered the thread

But I shouldn't expect any more of people who believe in flying winged men who help an omnipotent being

Yes, that is how ridiculous you are

So try again, what is the point of angels if god is omnipotent

BTW your obfuscation is fooling nobody

I have got you with this one yet again

Your fucked up views are exposed for the imbecility they represent

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

No takers?

I bet you still believe in these winged men helping omnipotemt god even though you cannot offer any explantaion of what they are for

Bizarre.

Surely you can see how utterly stupid this makes you?

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

I'm very disappointed with you Christians

Not one of you can explain why god needs Hellers in the form of swan winged men?

Why, anyone would think you'd have to be utterly deranged to believe in angels at all

Does god have wings?

Heaven must be full of feathers.

Do they have cats in heaven?

Or at least men with cats legs