The Revolution Will Not Be Terrorized

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
3,827
nothing new in the killing of people on the high seas by imperial criminals

"...The Caribbean Sea holds the memories of countless African and Indigenous lives brutally killed by imperial power. From the terrible Transatlantic Slave Trade to today’s US bombings of civilian vessels, executing dozens of Caribbean people. Though separated by centuries, the underlying motives remain the same: profit-driven colonial domination.

This year, Latin America and the Caribbean honor the memory of the victims of the “Zong Massacre” on its 244th anniversary and its lasting impact on the fight against colonialism.

In 1781, the British slave ship Zong left Accra in Ghana with 442 Africans on board, which was more than twice its capacity. The captives were destined for Jamaica, where they would be sold for an average price of £36 each to work on sugar plantations. However, the British enslavers ran low on supplies after navigating off course miles from the island and decided to mass murder captives to collect insurance money of £30 per person.

On November 29, 54 women and children were thrown into the Caribbean Sea. A further 78 men were tossed overboard in the following days, while 10 enslaved people jumped into the water in an act of revolutionary resistance. Another 62 Africans had already died on board from malnutrition and disease. The story is only known because of court documents, which were filed after the insurance company sued the ship’s crew to avoid paying.

The “Zong Massacre” reminds us of the horrors of colonialism and serves as a warning against today’s Western imperialist efforts to repeat history through different methods, exploiting the labour and resources of indigenous and black nations.

Centuries ago, the bodies of thousands of Africans were either left to drown or to be eaten by sharks. The same is happening now, with more than 80 people having been killed since September, mostly in Caribbean waters just a few miles from the Venezuelan coast, but also in the Eastern Pacific, by US military forces. Their mangled bodies have been left to sink to the bottom of the sea or wash up on the shores of nearby countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, as happened soon after the US attacked the first vessel, killing 11.

Trinidadian villagers said that the two corpses that washed ashore had burned marks on their faces, making them unrecognizable, and that they were missing limbs, as if they had been blown up. Rather than acknowledging these deaths as likely victims of US terrorism, the New York Times, which first reported the story, described the bodies’ mutilated appearance as a “mystery.”

The victims of recent US bombings hail from Venezuela, Colombia and Trinidad and Tobago, all territories with a centuries-long legacy of Indigenous and African anti-colonial resistance. Fishing communities have reported friends and relatives missing in the past three months, believing US forces likely bombed them. The Trump administration claims the boats were trafficking narcotics, but it has never presented any supporting evidence.

United Nations officials and experts have classified the strikes as “extrajudicial killings,” a term that essentially means murder. Even if the allegations were true, the US government does not have the authority to kill people in the Caribbean on the colonial basis that their lives are worth less than American lives, as the British slavers on the Zong did to Africans.


comrade stalin
caracas
 
Werbung:
nothing new in the killing of people on the high seas by imperial criminals

"...The Caribbean Sea holds the memories of countless African and Indigenous lives brutally killed by imperial power. From the terrible Transatlantic Slave Trade to today’s US bombings of civilian vessels, executing dozens of Caribbean people. Though separated by centuries, the underlying motives remain the same: profit-driven colonial domination.

This year, Latin America and the Caribbean honor the memory of the victims of the “Zong Massacre” on its 244th anniversary and its lasting impact on the fight against colonialism.

In 1781, the British slave ship Zong left Accra in Ghana with 442 Africans on board, which was more than twice its capacity. The captives were destined for Jamaica, where they would be sold for an average price of £36 each to work on sugar plantations. However, the British enslavers ran low on supplies after navigating off course miles from the island and decided to mass murder captives to collect insurance money of £30 per person.

On November 29, 54 women and children were thrown into the Caribbean Sea. A further 78 men were tossed overboard in the following days, while 10 enslaved people jumped into the water in an act of revolutionary resistance. Another 62 Africans had already died on board from malnutrition and disease. The story is only known because of court documents, which were filed after the insurance company sued the ship’s crew to avoid paying.

The “Zong Massacre” reminds us of the horrors of colonialism and serves as a warning against today’s Western imperialist efforts to repeat history through different methods, exploiting the labour and resources of indigenous and black nations.

Centuries ago, the bodies of thousands of Africans were either left to drown or to be eaten by sharks. The same is happening now, with more than 80 people having been killed since September, mostly in Caribbean waters just a few miles from the Venezuelan coast, but also in the Eastern Pacific, by US military forces. Their mangled bodies have been left to sink to the bottom of the sea or wash up on the shores of nearby countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, as happened soon after the US attacked the first vessel, killing 11.

Trinidadian villagers said that the two corpses that washed ashore had burned marks on their faces, making them unrecognizable, and that they were missing limbs, as if they had been blown up. Rather than acknowledging these deaths as likely victims of US terrorism, the New York Times, which first reported the story, described the bodies’ mutilated appearance as a “mystery.”

The victims of recent US bombings hail from Venezuela, Colombia and Trinidad and Tobago, all territories with a centuries-long legacy of Indigenous and African anti-colonial resistance. Fishing communities have reported friends and relatives missing in the past three months, believing US forces likely bombed them. The Trump administration claims the boats were trafficking narcotics, but it has never presented any supporting evidence.

United Nations officials and experts have classified the strikes as “extrajudicial killings,” a term that essentially means murder. Even if the allegations were true, the US government does not have the authority to kill people in the Caribbean on the colonial basis that their lives are worth less than American lives, as the British slavers on the Zong did to Africans.


comrade stalin
caracas
1764716197491.webp
 
nothing new in the killing of people on the high seas by imperial criminals

"...The Caribbean Sea holds the memories of countless African and Indigenous lives brutally killed by imperial power. From the terrible Transatlantic Slave Trade to today’s US bombings of civilian vessels, executing dozens of Caribbean people. Though separated by centuries, the underlying motives remain the same: profit-driven colonial domination.

This year, Latin America and the Caribbean honor the memory of the victims of the “Zong Massacre” on its 244th anniversary and its lasting impact on the fight against colonialism.

In 1781, the British slave ship Zong left Accra in Ghana with 442 Africans on board, which was more than twice its capacity. The captives were destined for Jamaica, where they would be sold for an average price of £36 each to work on sugar plantations. However, the British enslavers ran low on supplies after navigating off course miles from the island and decided to mass murder captives to collect insurance money of £30 per person.

On November 29, 54 women and children were thrown into the Caribbean Sea. A further 78 men were tossed overboard in the following days, while 10 enslaved people jumped into the water in an act of revolutionary resistance. Another 62 Africans had already died on board from malnutrition and disease. The story is only known because of court documents, which were filed after the insurance company sued the ship’s crew to avoid paying.

The “Zong Massacre” reminds us of the horrors of colonialism and serves as a warning against today’s Western imperialist efforts to repeat history through different methods, exploiting the labour and resources of indigenous and black nations.

Centuries ago, the bodies of thousands of Africans were either left to drown or to be eaten by sharks. The same is happening now, with more than 80 people having been killed since September, mostly in Caribbean waters just a few miles from the Venezuelan coast, but also in the Eastern Pacific, by US military forces. Their mangled bodies have been left to sink to the bottom of the sea or wash up on the shores of nearby countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, as happened soon after the US attacked the first vessel, killing 11.

Trinidadian villagers said that the two corpses that washed ashore had burned marks on their faces, making them unrecognizable, and that they were missing limbs, as if they had been blown up. Rather than acknowledging these deaths as likely victims of US terrorism, the New York Times, which first reported the story, described the bodies’ mutilated appearance as a “mystery.”

The victims of recent US bombings hail from Venezuela, Colombia and Trinidad and Tobago, all territories with a centuries-long legacy of Indigenous and African anti-colonial resistance. Fishing communities have reported friends and relatives missing in the past three months, believing US forces likely bombed them. The Trump administration claims the boats were trafficking narcotics, but it has never presented any supporting evidence.

United Nations officials and experts have classified the strikes as “extrajudicial killings,” a term that essentially means murder. Even if the allegations were true, the US government does not have the authority to kill people in the Caribbean on the colonial basis that their lives are worth less than American lives, as the British slavers on the Zong did to Africans.


comrade stalin
caracas
Preppy Progressives' Changing Victim Groups

Marx called those worthless, undisciplined, and untrustworthy savages "lumpen-proletariat."
 
so good to see that someone on this form who does not think of Karl Marx as one of the Marx Brothers

well done comrade - a better word to describe maga acolytes could not be found

According to historian Robert Bussard, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels viewed the lumpenproletariat as:

essentially parasitical group was largely the remains of older, obsolete stages of social development, and that it could not normally play a progressive role in history. Indeed, because it acted only out of socially ignorant self-interest, the lumpenproletariat was easily bribed by reactionary forces and could be used to combat the true proletariat in its efforts to bring about the end of bourgeois society. Without a clear class-consciousness, the lumpenproletariat could not play a positive role in society. Instead, it exploited society for its own ends, and was in turn exploited as a tool of destruction and reaction.

They used the term exclusively with negative connotations, although their works lack "consistent and clearly reasoned definition" of the term. They used the term in various publications "for diverse purposes and on several levels of meaning.

Hal Draper suggested that the concept has its roots in Young Hegelian thought and possibly in G.W.F. Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right. While Bussard believes that the idea was "at one and the same time, a hybrid of new social attitudes which crystallised in France, England and Germany, as well as an extension of more traditional, pre-nineteenth-century views of the lower classes. Bussard noted that they often used the term as a "kind of sociological profanity" and contrasted between it and "working and thinking" proletariat.According to Michael Denning by identifying the lumpenproletariat, "Marx was combating the established view that the entire working class was a dangerous and immoral element. He drew a line between the proletariat and the lumpenproletariat to defend the moral character of the former."


comrade stalin
Marxist Leninist
Moscow
 
Last edited:
so good to see that someone on this form who does not think of Karl Marx as one of the Marx Brothers

well done comrade - a better word to describe maga acolytes could not be found

According to historian Robert Bussard, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels viewed the lumpenproletariat as:



They used the term exclusively with negative connotations, although their works lack "consistent and clearly reasoned definition" of the term. They used the term in various publications "for diverse purposes and on several levels of meaning.

Hal Draper suggested that the concept has its roots in Young Hegelian thought and possibly in G.W.F. Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right. While Bussard believes that the idea was "at one and the same time, a hybrid of new social attitudes which crystallised in France, England and Germany, as well as an extension of more traditional, pre-nineteenth-century views of the lower classes. Bussard noted that they often used the term as a "kind of sociological profanity" and contrasted between it and "working and thinking" proletariat.According to Michael Denning by identifying the lumpenproletariat, "Marx was combating the established view that the entire working class was a dangerous and immoral element. He drew a line between the proletariat and the lumpenproletariat to defend the moral character of the former."


comrade stalin
Marxist Leninist
Moscow
Karl Marx was under the devil' influence, not God's.
 
preacherSm.jpg
Karl Marx was under the devil' influence, not God's.
.
Yeah....let's hear it for God's influence....
.
"This God, according to the Bible, is directly responsible for many mass-murders, rapes, pillage, plunder, slavery, child abuse and killing, not to mention the killing of unborn children."
.
 
so good to see that someone on this form who does not think of Karl Marx as one of the Marx Brothers

well done comrade - a better word to describe maga acolytes could not be found

According to historian Robert Bussard, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels viewed the lumpenproletariat as:



They used the term exclusively with negative connotations, although their works lack "consistent and clearly reasoned definition" of the term. They used the term in various publications "for diverse purposes and on several levels of meaning.

Hal Draper suggested that the concept has its roots in Young Hegelian thought and possibly in G.W.F. Hegel's Elements of the Philosophy of Right. While Bussard believes that the idea was "at one and the same time, a hybrid of new social attitudes which crystallised in France, England and Germany, as well as an extension of more traditional, pre-nineteenth-century views of the lower classes. Bussard noted that they often used the term as a "kind of sociological profanity" and contrasted between it and "working and thinking" proletariat.According to Michael Denning by identifying the lumpenproletariat, "Marx was combating the established view that the entire working class was a dangerous and immoral element. He drew a line between the proletariat and the lumpenproletariat to defend the moral character of the former."


comrade stalin
Marxist Leninist
Moscow
Guillotine-Fodder's Revenge

Marx represented the criminals born in the upper class. He was seduced by his wife, Jenny Von Westphalen (Von signifies "aristocrat"). She had inherited enough noble rank to marry any king in Europe, but Communism promised to make her Empress of All Europe.

Commies even admit that they are led by Preppies, claiming that the other classes are only thinking about their self-interest in a revolution, while the born-rich are willing to sacrifice all their privileges for the movement. Socialism has been an heiristocratic fraud from its beginning; its secret appeal is to those whose Daddies always told them they were Born to Rule.
 
Karl Marx was under the devil' influence, not God's.
Engels's Daddy Was a Rich Businessman. Lots of Oedipus Complex in Leftist Neuroses,

Marx came from the untitled nobility, and his wife was a countess. QED that inheritance is a gift from Satan. Thanks for unintentionally proving my point.
 
.
Yeah....let's hear it for God's influence....
.
"This God, according to the Bible, is directly responsible for many mass-murders, rapes, pillage, plunder, slavery, child abuse and killing, not to mention the killing of unborn children."
.
Pro-Life Is Pro-Death

Specify that all miscarriages are God murdering "babies," as the Christofascists call fetuses. Even worse, according to their dogma, abortion to save the life of the "mother" would be First Degree Murder, while letting her die would be only Negligent Manslaughter, to be pardoned because it was left in the hands of their god.
 
Guillotine-Fodder's Revenge

Marx represented the criminals born in the upper class. He was seduced by his wife, Jenny Von Westphalen (Von signifies "aristocrat"). She had inherited enough noble rank to marry any king in Europe, but Communism promised to make her Empress of All Europe.

Commies even admit that they are led by Preppies, claiming that the other classes are only thinking about their self-interest in a revolution, while the born-rich are willing to sacrifice all their privileges for the movement. Socialism has been an heiristocratic fraud from its beginning; its secret appeal is to those whose Daddies always told them they were Born to Rule.
Like Marx, uncivilized rebels like Bill Ayers and Mamdani are products of the rich upper class as well.
 
Pro-Life Is Pro-Death

Specify that all miscarriages are God murdering "babies," as the Christofascists call fetuses. Even worse, according to their dogma, abortion to save the life of the "mother" would be First Degree Murder, while letting her die would be only Negligent Manslaughter, to be pardoned because it was left in the hands of their god.
God does not murder miscarried babies any more than he murders old people whose bodies fall apart.
 
Guillotine-Fodder's Revenge

Marx represented the criminals born in the upper class. He was seduced by his wife, Jenny Von Westphalen (Von signifies "aristocrat"). She had inherited enough noble rank to marry any king in Europe, but Communism promised to make her Empress of All Europe.

Commies even admit that they are led by Preppies, claiming that the other classes are only thinking about their self-interest in a revolution, while the born-rich are willing to sacrifice all their privileges for the movement. Socialism has been an heiristocratic fraud from its beginning; its secret appeal is to those whose Daddies always told them they were Born to Rule.

yeah lets attack a man's wife instead of discussing the writings - something the intellectual colossus frump would do automatically..

communism took hundreds of millions of people out of degradation and starvation in the USSR and China.

When Mao defeated the Tong Boss Chang China was devastated by warlords and japanese imperialism.

Now it is the most dynamic country in the world..

comrade stalin
moscow
 
God does not murder miscarried babies any more than he murders old people whose bodies fall apart.
If God created humans, then every death is the result of his design. If he is all powerful, then everyone could theoretically live forever. There are trees than have lived for over 1000 years, and tortoises and sharks and several other species routinely outlive people, and almost never take any medicine.
 
Werbung:
If God created humans, then every death is the result of his design. If he is all powerful, then everyone could theoretically live forever. There are trees than have lived for over 1000 years, and tortoises and sharks and several other species routinely outlive people, and almost never take any medicine.
Unbelievers don't believe the Bible so they must believe death was invented by some stupid accident of ignorant emerging natural forces.
 
Back
Top