2016 list of SCOTUS Justices who received gifts and took free trips by the dozens does not list Justice Thomas

mark francis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
27,741
Was Justice Thomas not allowed to participate in the gift parade? Apparently not enough before 2016 for leftists to take note.


Justices Disclose Privately Paid Trips and Gifts​


23scotus-articleLarge.jpg

Justice Stephen G. Breyer took 19 paid trips last year, the most by the eight justices.Credit...Manuel Balce Ceneta/Associated Press
By Adam Liptak

  • June 22, 2016
WASHINGTON — Members of the Supreme Court took scores of trips paid for by private sponsors last year, according to the financial disclosure forms of eight justices released Wednesday.

No information was provided concerning Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February while on a hunting trip in Texas. He had been staying without charge at a hunting lodge owned by John Poindexter, a businessman whose company had recently had a matter before the Supreme Court.

Justice Scalia was an enthusiastic traveler, taking more than 250 privately funded trips from 2004 to 2014. A few weeks before he died, he visited Singapore and Hong Kong. A court spokeswoman said there would be no disclosure form detailing Justice Scalia’s travels in 2015.
The forms that were released offered a cursory overview of the other justices’ finances and activities, but they did provide a glimpse of their often demanding schedules of extrajudicial appearances.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer was the most active traveler last year, taking 19 paid trips, including three to London and two to Paris. The trips were partly to promote his book “The Court and the World,” which was published last year. He reported royalties and other payments from his publisher of about $120,000.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor was next, with 16 paid trips, but to less exotic places. She reported no new royalties from her best-selling memoir, “My Beloved World.”

In 2015, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. took paid trips to London and the Dominican Republic; Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to London, South Korea and Zurich; Justice Elena Kagan to Jerusalem; and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy to Salzburg, Austria.
headshot
Adam Liptak
Supreme Court reporter

“I try to make the Supreme Court accessible to readers. I strive to distill and translate complex legal materials into accessible prose, while presenting fairly the arguments of both sides and remaining alert to the political context and practical consequences of the court’s work.”
Learn about how Adam Liptak approaches covering the court.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. noted a single trip, to Tokyo, where he taught a course in July on the history of the Supreme Court.
Almost without exception, the forms did not disclose the costs involved, saying only that a justice had been reimbursed for, say, “transportation, food and lodging.” But Justice Ginsburg did say the Supreme Court of Korea had paid $8,220 for airfare, and Justice Sotomayor disclosed that she had flown to the University of Notre Dame on a private plane.

Other sources indicate that the justices’ trips can be lavish. According to records obtained under an Australian freedom of information law, the University of Adelaide paid more than $38,000 for Justice Scalia, his wife and another couple to fly business class to a 2011 conference.
The trip lasted almost two weeks and included luxury hotels in Los Angeles, and in Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne and Tasmania in Australia for the two couples that were paid for by the university.

A few of the justices disclosed gifts received last year. The University of Chicago Law School gave Justice Kagan a signed first edition of a book by Justice Felix Frankfurter. Harlan Crow, a real estate magnate and a major contributor to conservative causes, gave Justice Clarence Thomas a bronze bust of Frederick Douglass worth $6,484.12.

The forms were released by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. The office does not post them online, and it required news organizations to pay $14.60 for photocopies.

Gabe Roth, the executive director of Fix the Court, said the justices were behind the times.
“While members of the legislative and executive branches file reports throughout the year about their stock transactions and privately financed travel, and even federal district and circuit court judges place certain details about their junkets online as they occur,” he said, “the Supreme Court stands alone in its policy of releasing such information only once per year.

“Other branches have worked to be responsive to modern times, and while the high court’s docket each year comprises a number of tech-based disputes,” Mr. Roth added, “the court as an institution is still operating as if the information age never began.”
Eric Lipton contributed reporting from Washington.
 
Werbung:
yeah, that's the point. he hid his trips by NOT reporting them.. no one knew about them in 2016, because thomas cowardly hid them and possibly broke the law in doing so. duh.

god you are so stupid. lol

For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks.

The extent and frequency of Crow’s apparent gifts to Thomas have no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court. These trips appeared nowhere on Thomas’ financial disclosures. His failure to report the flights appears to violate a law passed after Watergate that requires justices, judges, members of Congress and federal officials to disclose most gifts, two ethics law experts said. He also should have disclosed his trips on the yacht, these experts said.


if this was your attempt to defend thomas, you really are dumber than I thought. lol
 
yeah, that's the point. he hid his trips by NOT reporting them.. no one knew about them in 2016, because thomas cowardly hid them and possibly broke the law in doing so. duh.

god you are so stupid. lol

For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks.

The extent and frequency of Crow’s apparent gifts to Thomas have no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court. These trips appeared nowhere on Thomas’ financial disclosures. His failure to report the flights appears to violate a law passed after Watergate that requires justices, judges, members of Congress and federal officials to disclose most gifts, two ethics law experts said. He also should have disclosed his trips on the yacht, these experts said.


if this was your attempt to defend thomas, you really are dumber than I thought. lol
Don't be a whiney-butt a-hole democrat critic of good men like Justice Thomas. You claim he hid his many trips as Scotus Justice but so what if he did? You do not prove he took trips the democrats had not identified by 2016 but there were hundreds of trips that were uncovered that other justices on both sides of the political spectrum took, so that makes modern criticism of Thomas completely invalid and hypocritical.
 
Don't be a whiney-butt a-hole democrat critic of good men like Justice Thomas. You claim he hid his many trips as Scotus Justice but so what if he did? You do not prove he took trips the democrats had not identified by 2016 but there were hundreds of trips that were uncovered that other justices on both sides of the political spectrum took, so that makes modern criticism of Thomas completely invalid and hypocritical.

what if he did? he was supposed to report them. He covered them up, which is pathetic for a supposedly unbiased scotus judge.
he is a coward and possibly a criminal.

god you are so pathetic, always covering up for right wing thugs.
 
what if he did? he was supposed to report them. He covered them up, which is pathetic for a supposedly unbiased scotus judge.
he is a coward and possibly a criminal.

god you are so pathetic, always covering up for right wing thugs.
You don't know the law. I dare you to try to produce evidence that all these justices who took trips were legally required to report them.
 
You don't know the law. I dare you to try to produce evidence that all these justices who took trips were legally required to report them.
i'm not addressing these "other judges". i'm addressing thomas, who admitted he covered up the trips by later disclosing them by adding them to the records after they were found out. lol.

classic right wing thug...tries to hide things until they get discovered.

Justice Clarence Thomas Acknowledges He Should Have Disclosed Free Trips From Billionaire Donor​


what a coward he is.
 
Don't be a whiney-butt a-hole democrat critic of good men like Justice Thomas.
Good man? He's a scumbag parasite godbothering republican married to a trump sycophant. Good man my arse.

You claim he hid his many trips as Scotus Justice but so what if he did?
The point is he should have declared them. He knows the law or supposed to. Yet you shrug it off as it its ok.
You do not prove he took trips the democrats had not identified by 2016 but there were hundreds of trips that were uncovered that other justices on both sides of the political spectrum took, so that makes modern criticism of Thomas completely invalid and hypocritical.
Thomas is a sleaze bag mongrel. He has been caught red handed on the take and should be impeached. In fact. I'd be surprised if he wasn't.
In the meantime you paint him as a saint because he's a republican godbotherer. You have the principles of an alley cat.
 
i'm not addressing these "other judges". i'm addressing thomas, who admitted he covered up the trips by later disclosing them by adding them to the records after they were found out. lol.

classic right wing thug...tries to hide things until they get discovered.

Justice Clarence Thomas Acknowledges He Should Have Disclosed Free Trips From Billionaire Donor​


what a coward he is.
What is required by law? Can you not find the law you say required all these justices to report trips they failed to report?
 
What is required by law? Can you not find the law you say required all these justices to report trips they failed to report?
What a ridiculous claim. You know it's against their oath and the law. How can they be fair when in the take.
Why are you protecting the POS.? He is guilty and should be charged.
 
What is required by law? Can you not find the law you say required all these justices to report trips they failed to report?

This is not the first time that Thomas has responded to public controversy about his disclosure practices by amending an old form. The forms are required by a federal law passed after Watergate that says justices must annually report income, assets and most gifts. At least twice before, Thomas has similarly defended his failure to make required disclosures as an unintentional error or a misunderstanding of the rules.

a scotus judge made an "unintentional error" because he forgot about a luxury trip? a scotus judge didn't understand the rules?

you can't be so stupid as to actually believe that, can you be? lol
 
What is required by law? Can you not find the law you say required all these justices to report trips they failed to report?

The Watergate scandal prompted a new effort for institutional ethics reform in Congress, resulting in, among other things, the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The law established financial interest reporting requirements for high-level government officials, including Supreme Court justices, and the responsibility to make these documents available to the public. It also gave the public new expectations for the ethical behavior of their leaders. From defining values of what was appropriate for an official to accept as a gift to establishing the Office of Government Ethics, the ethics law established clear-cut rules for financial behavior and consequences for violations. A decade later, the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 expanded those requirements.
 
The Watergate scandal prompted a new effort for institutional ethics reform in Congress, resulting in, among other things, the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. The law established financial interest reporting requirements for high-level government officials, including Supreme Court justices, and the responsibility to make these documents available to the public. It also gave the public new expectations for the ethical behavior of their leaders. From defining values of what was appropriate for an official to accept as a gift to establishing the Office of Government Ethics, the ethics law established clear-cut rules for financial behavior and consequences for violations. A decade later, the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 expanded those requirements.
I was wrong. The law does require reporting that nearly every SCOTUS Justice in the last 40 years have violated, some hundreds of times. How serious is this? Ginsburg apparently made more than a hundred overseas trips she failed to report. What about the new girl on the court? She hasn't been there long enough to rack up dozens of unreported trips, but she has already had to amend her statements due to earlier reporting errors. Should we consider impeaching or silencing her for not reporting details she should have reported?

Exclusive: Justice Jackson Amends Ten Financial Disclosure Reports​

APRIL 2, 2024


This post has been updated with new information.
A year and a half after Fix the Court exclusively reported that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had omitted two trips, a teaching gig, several board positions, information on her daughters’ college funds and some spousal income from her financial disclosure reports, those disclosures have been amended and posted in the judiciary’s online database (screencap below).
 
I was wrong. The law does require reporting that nearly every SCOTUS Justice in the last 40 years have violated, some hundreds of times. How serious is this? Ginsburg apparently made more than a hundred overseas trips she failed to report. What about the new girl on the court? She hasn't been there long enough to rack up dozens of unreported trips, but she has already had to amend her statements due to earlier reporting errors. Should we consider impeaching or silencing her for not reporting details she should have reported?

Exclusive: Justice Jackson Amends Ten Financial Disclosure Reports​

APRIL 2, 2024


This post has been updated with new information.
A year and a half after Fix the Court exclusively reported that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had omitted two trips, a teaching gig, several board positions, information on her daughters’ college funds and some spousal income from her financial disclosure reports, those disclosures have been amended and posted in the judiciary’s online database (screencap below).
which has nothing to do with the extent and length of thomas, "not understanding" a simple law. lol
 
Werbung:
Back
Top