Adolf Hitler was a Neo-Conservative

Werbung:

Jeugenen

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
178
Adolf Hitler Has Joined The Immortals Of History, As The National Socialist Nemesis Of Marxism In Germany. Today, Germany, Thanks To Hitler Is Now The Leading Power In Europe.
 

Andy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
3,497
so there have been socialists against marxism? wow!

sorta blows the idea that socialism = marxism

Kinda. Socialism is the superset that includes many different forms, marxism being one of them. Marxism is a socialist system, but not all forms of Socialism are Marxism.

Hitler's brand of Socialism was different and incompatible with Stalins. Just as the Chinese brand of Socialism was different from Stalin's.

The point being that it is entirely possible for two socialist groups to be against each other, just as it's possible for two Arab groups to be against each other. Iran-Iraq war as example... here I thought they hated Jews?

Hitler was a socialist. It was the "National Socialist German Workers’ Party" after all... which we call Nazi.

Of course the over all point in conclusion is: Socialism kills... regardless of the form.
 

The Scotsman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,025
Location
South of the Haggis Munching Line
I think the word you're all struggling to get out is FASCIST.

Having a wartime FASCIST leader did not make Germany the power it is today it was America and the UK and Canada re-building and re-financing the ecomony of Germany so that it was in shape to buffer the west from the Soviet Bloc.

Thank you......Now Mods can we now close this ridiculous thread?
 

Andy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
3,497
I think the word you're all struggling to get out is FASCIST.

Having a wartime FASCIST leader did not make Germany the power it is today it was America and the UK and Canada re-building and re-financing the ecomony of Germany so that it was in shape to buffer the west from the Soviet Bloc.

Thank you......Now Mods can we now close this ridiculous thread?

Erm... we tried to make Germany pay for the entire first world war. That crashed their economy. That's what led for the Nazis. What does any of this have to do with Fascism? Or for that matter the Soviets? In fact, it was the Nazis that started aggression against Poland *with* the Stalin. We were worried that the Nazis would ally with the Soviets, not fight against them.

I like how you want the thread closed before someone can respond to the re-write of history can be examined.
 

Foolosophy

Active Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
36
Location
Australia
And we can see how the USA is based on socialism when it comes to handing out corporate welfare cheques for its inefficient private Big businesses and corrupt financial sector which relie on greed to function and grow.

WHERE IS THE MYTHICAL FREE US MARKET ECONOMY NOW?

It Never was - WAS IT FOLKS!

:)
 

Jeugenen

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
178
Yes, Adolf Hitler has in fact joined the immortals of history, as the National Socialist nemesis of Marxism in Germany. Germany, thanks to Hitler is now the leading power in Europa. Had Hitler not defeated the Marxists in Germany, the UK and America could not have re-built Germany, as suggested by the fate of East Germany. To Hitler, America and the UK owe their victory in the Cold War against Marxist USSR.
Every perceptive American and UK patriot clearly understands why Ronald Reagan, representing America, paid the highest respects to Germany by visiting the famous cemetery at Bitburg. The notorious attempts by failed Marxists, Neo-Marxists, and Crypto-Neo-Marxists to revise the history of World War II are transparently politically self-serving, and make fools only of credulous and ignorant persons.
 

Bunz

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
3,215
Location
Alaska
I stand corrected. I had thought that most of Iran was of Arab decent. Well, pick from any number of Arab on Arab wars.

You see thats just it. In the last 300 years, there has been a single one what would be an arab on arab war. The Iraq invasion of Kuwait and subsequent removal from Kuwait. With the acception of choosing sides in the World Wars, there is very little fighting between Arab nations in the traditional large scale warfare sense.
Unless of course one is willing to admit and consider the current situation in Iraq as a civil war.
 

Bunz

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
3,215
Location
Alaska
Persians are only 51% of the population.

It is still a fairly large majority, Iran is actually a quite diverse place all things considered. The Persians though are the controlling majority by far. Thier media, government and industry is largely controlled by Persians.
 
Werbung:

Libsmasher

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
3,151
It is still a fairly large majority, Iran is actually a quite diverse place all things considered. The Persians though are the controlling majority by far. Thier media, government and industry is largely controlled by Persians.

Proof?
 
Top