American Taliban

Werbung:
"Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke to President-elect Spanky by phone Tuesday to recommend one of his former law clerks for a job in the new administration, ABC News has learned.

The call occurred
just hours before Spanky's lawyers on Wednesday morning filed an emergency request with the justices asking them to block a New York judge from moving forward with sentencing Trump on Friday in his criminal hush money case.

Alito said that he and Trump did not discuss that matter.

"We did not discuss the emergency application he filed today, and indeed, I was
not even aware at the time of our conversation that such an application would be filed," Alito said. "We also did not discuss any other matter that is pending or might in the future come before the Supreme Court or any past Supreme Court decisions involving the President-elect."
 
"There will be many legacies of the Roberts court whenever the history of this era is written, assuming history books are still allowed in the America John Roberts leaves behind. There will be the court’s string of anti-labor decisions, its extremist rulings in support of guns and against voting rights, and its rejection of precedents like Roe v. Wade. But one of Roberts’s most problematic contributions to the annals of the Supreme Court will be the trail of apparent corruption and impropriety the associate justices have gotten up to under his watch.

Under Roberts, the idea that the Supreme Court can police itself has been revealed to be an
utter farce. From the way Clarence Thomas refuses to recuse himself from cases involving the insurrection his wife seemingly helped to foment to the 83 ethics complaints that were not investigated against alleged attempted rapist Brett Kavanaugh, Roberts has been an absentee landlord. He makes grand pronouncements defending the “legitimacy” of the court without doing anything to protect its legitimacy. He has a whole lot to say anytime a liberal justice suggests that the court is losing its standing in the eyes of the public (an objective fact backed up by polling data) but doesnt say anything while conservative justices allow Federalist Society and religious-right influencers to turn the Supreme Court into their private frat house."

.
 
"One year ago, shortly after a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was published, Justice Clarence Thomas bemoaned that the leak had eroded public trust in the body. “I wonder how long we’re going to have these institutions at the rate we’re undermining them,” Thomas told attendees at a gathering hosted by three conservative think tanks.

Looking back, it was an ironic moment."

.
 
Last edited:
"One year ago, shortly after a draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade was published, Justice Clarence Thomas bemoaned that the leak had eroded public trust in the body. “I wonder how long we’re going to have these institutions at the rate we’re undermining them,” Thomas told attendees at a gathering hosted by three conservative think tanks.

Looking back, it was an ironic moment."

.
Whoever broke the law and leaked the SCOTUS abortion negotiation was clearly someone unfamiliar with US laws, decency, propriety, and honesty. I certainly hope it was not some new DEI appointee to the court. However, if it was a new DEI hire that might be why the government is hiding the evidence and refusing to name the perp who so egregiously broke the law.
 
.
$UPREMO$!!!!
July 25, 2025

.
"We updated our $upreme Connections database with newly released financial disclosures from eight Supreme Court justices on Friday, covering the 2024 calendar year.
.
$
upreme Connections is our database that makes it easy for anyone to browse justices’ financial disclosures and to search for connections to people and companies mentioned within them."
.
 
.
$UPREMO$!!!!
July 25, 2025

.
"We updated our $upreme Connections database with newly released financial disclosures from eight Supreme Court justices on Friday, covering the 2024 calendar year.
.
$
upreme Connections is our database that makes it easy for anyone to browse justices’ financial disclosures and to search for connections to people and companies mentioned within them."
.
1754846107524.webp
 
.
TYPICAL WHITE-TRASH, RACIST JESUS-FREAK!!!!
.
maxresdefault.jpg

.
 
.
TYPICAL WHITE-TRASH, RACIST JESUS-FREAK!!!!
.
maxresdefault.jpg

.

Teacher who was called ‘white trash’ wins $350,000 lawsuit​


1756808428772.webp
 
Werbung:
"Earlier this week, the Supremos handed down a one-page order that greenlit federal immigration officers use of blatant racial profiling when conducting armed raids in the Los Angeles area. A lower court had temporarily barred ICE from detaining people based solely on factors like “they are speaking Spanish or “they are day laborers waiting outside Home Depot in the morning.” By blocking that lower court order, the members of the court’s conservative supermajority have once again used the shadow docket to give their very favorite president everything for which he asks. Only the three liberals noted their dissent.
.
As is
usually the case with the SUPREMOS' pro-Trump shadow docket jurisprudence, the majority did not explain its decision. But one justice, Brett Kavanaugh, wrote a concurring opinion only for himself, which contains—and here I apologize for the legal jargon—some of the stupidest shit I have ever encountered in the U.S. Reports. Over the course of 10 pages, Kavanaugh fumbles his way through the sort of legal and factual analysis that a second-year law student would find a little embarrassing, laced with the affected earnestness of someone whose only conception of hardship is when his vacation home’s cleaning crew gets stuck in traffic. I honestly wonder if none of the other conservatives joined it because, although they agree with the bottom-line result, none of them wanted their names publicly associated with this vapid dreck.
.
You can set aside, for a moment, the
absurdity of this logic, which has the effect of shielding violent cops from even modest efforts to use the legal system to curb police brutality. As Sotomayor points out in dissent, Lyons was a case about law enforcement officers doing things they were (ostensibly) not supposed to do. This case, four decades later, is about law enforcement officers carrying out Stephen Miller’s explicit orders to hunt down brown people and purge them from the country by any means necessary. Kavanaughs logic would not only insulate the government from accountability for its agents’ unauthorized violations of people’s rights, but also for ordering those agents to violate those rights with impunity."
.
.
.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top