Openmind
Well-Known Member
The problem with your post is it infers that Obama's policies will result in a healthy recovery and it can't. Your placing blame in the wrong place.
This does a nice job of explaining the situation...
Your opinion. Not mine.
I believe that this article is ridiculous in many aspects. One exemple is: do you really think that someone who has the potential of making over $50,000 a year would foregoe looking for a job because he/she receives the a mere $1,000 a month in unemployment?
And. . .Obama's policies may not be the "sure thing" to lead to a HEALTHY recovery, but it led us to a RECOVERY . . . and it sure beats Bush's policies. . . and I don't think Romney will do any better than his Republican predecessor, so Romney's policies are CERTAINLY NOT a "sure thing" to assure a "healthy recovery!" In fact, I don't think he has given any indication that he knew how to operate in a WORLD economy. . .and he would have to face the total disbelief in his ability as a leader that much of the world already harbor. . .In fact, Romney is seen as a clown and an emtpy suit all over the world. . .so he would have to deal with the lack of respect EVERYWHERE outside the US. . .and 50% of the US population as well. Not a good omen for a "new world leader!"
And, no, I am not unaware of economic policies. . .In fact, without pretending to be a wiz kid about economics (I am not!), I at least have formal education about all aspects of economics and the different theories. A BA in Economic (with honors) doesn't make one a wiz kid. . . but it does allow one to understand the bigger picture.