Black Panther issue...why do you never learn? from the Assistant A. General

[pocketfullofshells]

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007060036

Bush administration "dropped" criminal charges.

Perez also testified that the Bush administration's Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes" but did "file a civil action on January 7, 2009." From Perez's testimony:

PEREZ: Moving to the matter at hand, the events occurred on November 4th, 2008. The Department became aware of these events on Election Day and decided to conduct further inquiry.

After reviewing the matter, the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes. The Department did, however, file a civil action on January 7th, 2009, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief under 11(b) against four defendants.

-------------

Perez testified "the evidence did not support" case against others. In his testimony Perez further explained that "as it related to the other defendants in the case, [DOJ attorneys] Ms. [Loretta] King and Mr. [Steve] Rosenbaum concluded that the evidence did not support that. And that was the decision that they made." From Perez's testimony:

PEREZ: The Department concluded that the allegations in the complaint against Jerry Jackson, the other defendant present at the polling place, as well as the allegations against the national New Black Panther Party and its leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, did not have sufficient evidentiary support.

The Department reviewed the totality of the evidence in the applicable law in reaching these decisions.

__

also under Bush,.,
http://mediamatters.org/research/201007020021

 

[pocketfullofshells]

as I should expect, all the ranting, facts come out, silence from the tea party fox lovers

 

[dogtowner]

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007060036

Bush administration "dropped" criminal charges.

Perez also testified that the Bush administration's Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes" but did "file a civil action on January 7, 2009." From Perez's testimony:

PEREZ: Moving to the matter at hand, the events occurred on November 4th, 2008. The Department became aware of these events on Election Day and decided to conduct further inquiry.

After reviewing the matter, the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes. The Department did, however, file a civil action on January 7th, 2009, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief under 11(b) against four defendants.

-------------

Perez testified "the evidence did not support" case against others. In his testimony Perez further explained that "as it related to the other defendants in the case, [DOJ attorneys] Ms. [Loretta] King and Mr. [Steve] Rosenbaum concluded that the evidence did not support that. And that was the decision that they made." From Perez's testimony:

PEREZ: The Department concluded that the allegations in the complaint against Jerry Jackson, the other defendant present at the polling place, as well as the allegations against the national New Black Panther Party and its leader, Malik Zulu Shabazz, did not have sufficient evidentiary support.

The Department reviewed the totality of the evidence in the applicable law in reaching these decisions.

__

also under Bush,.,
http://mediamatters.org/research/201007020021

later back at the ranch

case inexplicably dropped dropped by Holder etal as reported

 

[pocketfullofshells]

so then the first time was for lack of evidence...the 2nd time was just cuz Obama is black...I see....all logical in tea party land

 

[Hobo1]

so then the first time was for lack of evidence...the 2nd time was just cuz Obama is black...I see....all logical in tea party land

I saw the video tape of 2 big dudes dressed in black uniforms, one with a nightstick, standing outside of the polling place. If that's not against the law, it certainly should be.

 

[Pandora]

so then the first time was for lack of evidence...the 2nd time was just cuz Obama is black...I see....all logical in tea party land

Erik Holder dropped the case AFTER he won it and just before sentencing

 

[PLC1]

later back at the ranch

case inexplicably dropped dropped by Holder etal as reported

Sources told The Bulletin that there is internal dissension in the Department of Justice (DOJ) about a voter intimidation case from last year’s presidential election. Obama appointees did not want to proceed with the case, while the career prosecutors did. The incident occurred in Philadelphia and involved the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense

If you can't believe a blog citing "sources", who can you believe?

 

[GenSeneca]

Media Matters About Us Section:

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

(emphasis mine)

Media Matters is a self admitted propaganda machine for the Left.

 

[Gipper]

Media Matters About Us Section:

(emphasis mine)

Media Matters is a self admitted propaganda machine for the Left.

Of course they are. But, leftists do not know this. They are useful idiots.

Much like many Russians believed Pravda during the commies reign of terror in USSR, many American liberals believe whatever the left media tells them.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

I saw the video tape of 2 big dudes dressed in black uniforms, one with a nightstick, standing outside of the polling place. If that's not against the law, it certainly should be.

well thats nice you think that, but of course, your not the AG ( under Bush or Obama) are you? and you don't have all teh evidence, and you don't even know where it was filmed for sure do you? and fact is, charges where dropped under bush for lack of evidence...if they brought it back and dropped again for same reason...hard to cry is becuse Obama is black when Bush is white.

Not that the nuts will not still do it

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Media Matters About Us Section:

(emphasis mine)

Media Matters is a self admitted propaganda machine for the Left.

and does that make its info wrong?

can't beat the message, attack the messenger

 

[Hobo1]

well thats nice you think that, but of course, your not the AG ( under Bush or Obama) are you? and you don't have all teh evidence, and you don't even know where it was filmed for sure do you? and fact is, charges where dropped under bush for lack of evidence...if they brought it back and dropped again for same reason...hard to cry is becuse Obama is black when Bush is white.

Not that the nuts will not still do it

Come on Pocket, your grasping at straws... Do you think this was all a conspiracy filmed in Hollywood to piss off the left? Kind of like the moon landing was staged in Hollywood? I heard the witnesses who gave creditable testimony and watched the video. "Lack of evidence" is a legal term that can have a lot of meanings, including a nice excuse to avoid a politically sensitive situation. The White House has plenty of political motive to cover-up this story to keep the black voting block happy.

If you don't believe the witnesses and video, then you are in deep denial. You can't handle the truth.

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Come on Pocket, your grasping at straws... Do you think this was all a conspiracy filmed in Hollywood to piss off the left? Kind of like the moon landing was staged in Hollywood? I heard the witnesses who gave creditable testimony and watched the video. "Lack of evidence" is a legal term that can have a lot of meanings, including a nice excuse to avoid a politically sensitive situation. The White House has plenty of political motive to cover-up this story to keep the black voting block happy.

If you don't believe the witnesses and video, then you are in deep denial. You can't handle the truth.

talk to the Bush Justice Department, who first dropped the case...ask them why dont ask me.

 

[Gipper]

talk to the Bush Justice Department, who first dropped the case...ask them why dont ask me.

Means nothing.

Bush was a progressive fool just like BO. (well actually BO is an American hating Marxist)

So what is your point?