Bush US: Hypocrisy Personified & Astounding

[top gun]

LOL. ............ that must have been sheer unadulterated LUCK.

I heard it was darts. Darth Cheney stood at the back of the Oval Office "mumbeling something about "shh shh You've failed me for the last time" and then threw a dart at a map. Damn good thing he didn't hit London I guess huh?

 

[Shadow]

I heard it was darts. Darth Cheney stood at the back of the Oval Office "mumbeling something about "shh shh You've failed me for the last time" and then threw a dart at a map. Damn good thing he didn't hit London I guess huh?

LOL ...... that's for damn sure. (or god forbid , the US itself.! (or did he get the proverbial three tries??) We have all seen how well he SHOOTS


an aside: but anyone know how his victim is doing?? Hope Cheney paid for all the plastic surgery that would have been needed.

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

There were no WMD in Iraq. That is, if your sources are anything but Fox News which still seems to think everyone else got it wrong.
There was no legal footing for regime change

And as for those risible comments about kicking Iraq ourt of the OIL rich state of Kuwait... I notice the US is not kicking Russia out of Georgia.

For 2 reasons. Georgia is not sitting on a massive pool of oil and the Russians can fight back.

Logical conclusion - Bush et al are a bunch of oil thieving bullies who pick on people smaller than themselves.

If you are so noble and full of pride in USA USA why don't you kick Bush's ass.

Clue, it is on his shoulders and he talks from it.

 

[Libsmasher]

There were no WMD in Iraq. That is, if your sources are anything but Fox News which still seems to think everyone else got it wrong.

You haven't proven this, and like all such stupid negative assertions it's virtually impossible to prove.

There was no legal footing for regime change

See how the euroweenie mind works? Someone has to get a PERMISSION SLIP from the UN, a conclave of mostly dictators, to overthrow a megakiller fascist dictator - TOTALLY ASSININE.

And as for those risible comments about kicking Iraq ourt of the OIL rich state of Kuwait... I notice the US is not kicking Russia out of Georgia.

As if there were any comparison between the two situations.

For 2 reasons. Georgia is not sitting on a massive pool of oil and the Russians can fight back.

So now the euroweenies are defending the re-establishment of a russian empire - well, that figures - they invented imperialism.

Logical conclusion - Bush et al are a bunch of oil thieving bullies who pick on people smaller than themselves.

Yaaaaaa - it was SO unfair to remove the Taliban.

Enough of your garbage.

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

I would take that post apart and make you look ridiculous but you have already done that for me.

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

Oh, and by the way, it is not up to me to prove there are no WMD in Iraq - you cannot prove a negative.

It is up to people like you and the US Government to prove that there were WMD in Iraq especially as they went to war on the basis that there was.

Even the halfwit in the Whitehouse acknowldges there aren't any in that disgustingly tasteless look under his desk scene.

How can you live with a leader of such unfeasible crassness and immorality?

Answer - because you are brainwashed and need all your information wrapped up in apple pie. You can't accept that your country behaves very badly.

That is why Hollywood had to dress up the genocide committed by the US against the native Americans in a way that made the Indians the bad guys.

How ****ed up is that?????

 

[top gun]

There were no WMD in Iraq. That is, if your sources are anything but Fox News which still seems to think everyone else got it wrong.
There was no legal footing for regime change

And as for those risible comments about kicking Iraq ourt of the OIL rich state of Kuwait... I notice the US is not kicking Russia out of Georgia.

For 2 reasons. Georgia is not sitting on a massive pool of oil and the Russians can fight back.

Logical conclusion - Bush et al are a bunch of oil thieving bullies who pick on people smaller than themselves.

If you are so noble and full of pride in USA USA why don't you kick Bush's ass.

Clue, it is on his shoulders and he talks from it.

Personally I'm just amazed ANYONE would try and contradict you on the WMD's not in IRAQ issue... THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION ITSELF has had to come forward and say that there were NONE FOUND!

Rembember this... George himself even joked about it. The fact he joked about it tells you even more what a scoundral he really is... but that's another story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VD1gOhpRSU


As far a Kuwait I can see it if the established government of a country is being invaded as in the first Gulf War and asks for help and we send in help to drive the invader back out that usually plays out as resonable. That's what Bush's father did. And he also said when asked why he wasn't going to go all the way to Baghdad... It's because I believe there'd be no clear exit strategy.

Yep!

But the invasion and occupation of Iraq was nothing like that. It was simply a lie wrapped in a deception placed in a diversion. WE didn't like a certain leader (that truthfully wasn't a good guy), Bush/Cheney wanted to look tough after 9-11, we also saw the OIL, and off Nation Building we went.

That's it. Not complicated at all. In fact it's really common knowledge now to anyone that isn't purposely just not wanting too look at it because in retrospect it hurts a certain Political Party.

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

You are almost right.

If Kuwait ha't been oil rich the USwould not have committed money, troups, lives.

At that time they could not live with the idea of Saddam controlling that much oil.

Fact.

Second war on Iraq was to steal oil.

It was planned before 9/11. 9/11 was organised to win support from a crazed nation who easily get blinded by patriotism.

And what a tragedy that it worked.

Oil is the denominator in both Iraq wars though.

 

[Andy]

what the heck are the US troops doing in Iraqi school yards?? Offering THEIR version of "security"?? (or is it something more perverse?? ) After THEY made the nation insecure???


what a crock.

Not relevant. There are dozens of reasons they could go there. Maybe they just wanted to see how their efforts helped Iraqi children.

What is relevant is that the Iraqi people support American soldiers. They support them enough that they feel comfortable, even secure with their children being in the care and supervision of American troops.

This is a direct and conclusive contradiction to your lame unsupportable assertions about our involvement in Iraq.

 

[Andy]

Tell us what brought down the Twin Towers on 9-11 Andy?

You tell me from a scientific basis what brought them down. You know some science I assume... maybe?

 

[Libsmasher]

I would take that post apart and make you look ridiculous but you have already done that for me.

You've been punked, and you have AT LEAST enough residual brains to slink away.

 

[Andy]

There were no WMD in Iraq. That is, if your sources are anything but Fox News which still seems to think everyone else got it wrong.
There was no legal footing for regime change

Do you know history? Can you explain the hundreds of Kurds that were wiped out by chemical weapons? Can you explain the scud missiles found, that were modified for chemical payload? Or perhaps the mobile bio-weapons labs?

Better still... if there never were any WMD in Iraq, please explain why Saddam kicked out the UN inspectors? Hint: you can not. Hint: you are wrong. Hint: you lost this argument.

And as for those risible comments about kicking Iraq ourt of the OIL rich state of Kuwait... I notice the US is not kicking Russia out of Georgia.

Um... you didn't notice the massive effort to pass UN resolution against Russia, and support Georgia? Have you missed the non-stop calls for Russia to withdraw? You lose this argument too. Btw, one difference is that we were allies with Kuwait. Something I disagree with, but we were.

For 2 reasons. Georgia is not sitting on a massive pool of oil and the Russians can fight back.

Georgia does have a huge invested interest in oil and natural gas pipelines that pass through it's boarders. I question just how much Russia can fight back. Yes they have a large military... but then Iraq had the 3rd largest military in the world. Yes they have a good degree of technology... but then Iraq had Russian military hardware. Yes they have nuclear capability... but then we have a missile defense shield that Reagan instituted. Yes their economy is doing better than under Soviet Socialism (shocking), but it's still very fragile.

One thing they have done, that we have not, is the Russians believe oil is a renewable resource, that it's being constantly created. As such, they have drilled and explored far more than we have, and thus have a larger ability to export than we do.

But flat out, I'm not scared of Russia yet. We could wipe out so much of the economic structure, it would fold just like Reagan folded up the Soviets and tossed them into the waste bin of history.

Logical conclusion - Bush et al are a bunch of oil thieving bullies who pick on people smaller than themselves.

So, based on this logical conclusion, what do you think of Clintons use of missiles, being fired off from the middle of the ocean, to blow up aspirin factories, and camels and tents in the desert? Or how about dropping bombs on peasant serbs in Bosnia?

That to me is being a bunch of cowardly bullies trying to protect yourself from lawsuits at home, but distracting people with deaths around the world, that we have no invested interest in.

Stopping a madman with terrorist ties and WMDs that has attacked all his neighbors, is not being a bully, it's justice and freedom to an oppressed population.

If you are so noble and full of pride in USA USA why don't you kick Bush's ass.

Because his actions are worth having pride in. It was the former president who we rightly tried to kick his felony committing butt out of office.

 

[Andy]

I would take that post apart and make you look ridiculous but you have already done that for me.

No... you do not... because you can not. Thank for playing, have a nice day.

 

[Dawkinsrocks]

The US attacked Iraq because it had a large pool of oil and could not fight back.

There are lots of countries with bad leaders where the US does not 'regime' change them.

There are lots of countries with WMD and let's be real - we are talking about nuclear weapons. The chemical argument is ridiculous. But the US isn't regime changing them.

The US did not intervene in Darfur or Congo where millions were massacred.

That is because it likes to attack countries with oil that can't fight back.

It is an international bully and its standing in the world is at an all time low.

Bush will be written up as the worst president in history.

But as you guys bought the story about the cowboys being the good guys and the Indians bad I don't expect you to accept this for another 30 years at least.

Banjo time.

 

[GenSeneca]

The US attacked Iraq because it had a large pool of oil and could not fight back.

False. If you bother looking at the historical numbers, we get just as much Oil from Iraq now as we did prior to the invasion. Yet you persist in claiming we steal their oil, with NOT ONE SINGLE BIT OF PROOF.

There are lots of countries with bad leaders where the US does not 'regime' change them.

True... They don't have a record like Saddam had either.

There are lots of countries with WMD and let's be real - we are talking about nuclear weapons. The chemical argument is ridiculous. But the US isn't regime changing them.

Let us be real... since you don't know what you're talking about:
Saddam used Chemical Weapons against his own people.... What other country has done that?
Nuclear weapons... so only if saddam had a nuclear missile ready for lauch would the US had been justified in claims of WMD? I think not... then you Lefties would be saying..."It was just ONE missile! Thats not REALLY WMD!"

Meanwhile, you ignore all the WMD material we did retrieve from Iraq, pretending it never happened, and continually claim that WMD in Iraq was a lie... So much for your credibility.

The US did not intervene in Darfur or Congo where millions were massacred.

Correct, they are not near any of our allies or threatening any of our allies... Not even the LEFT in America wants to go to those places... They just think SOMEBODY should do SOMETHING...

That is because it likes to attack countries with oil that can't fight back.

We are the lone superpower, no other nation could fight back on equal terms.

It is an international bully and its standing in the world is at an all time low.

Ok Mr. Leftist talking points... When, in your opinion, was America at its High point in international standing? Ever?

Bush will be written up as the worst president in history.

Wishful thinking... that or you have a crystal ball that lets you see 50 years into the future... Which is it?

But as you guys bought the story about the cowboys being the good guys and the Indians bad I don't expect you to accept this for another 30 years at least.

Your use of stereotypes and sweeping generalizations reveals your inability to grasp the concept of Americans as individuals that think for themselves. Yes, some get caught in the trap of "Group Think" and hollywood has a great deal of responsibility for this... Just look at the Anti-America rubbish they have been cranking out for the last decade. For example: People who think for themselves don't base their opinion of the American healthcare system on a LIE filled movie from Micheal Moore.