Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death

[mark francis]

It works for me.

I hope you watch my latest post and you'll see how grossly lopsided it is suggested who are the most violent party.

I find it almost unbelievable that the left incites and commits violence and then claims conservatives and republicans are the real ones propagating hatred and violence.

 

[Starcastle]

Still waiting on the video that shows Charlie Kirk saying that we should stone anybody.

Stalin is a liar!

A desperate pos human being and a liar.

 

[Starcastle]

Like Rush Limbaugh before him you cannot lie about what Charlie Kirk has said or what he believed. His opinions are out there for the world to hear.

Charlie in the last decade has given hundreds of interviews and participated in hundreds of debates. All of his opinions and ideas documented on video. Anything he has said that you believe was hate speech can just be located and pasted.

This is about his opinions not what some rainbow cretin thinks about him.

 

[mark francis]

Like Rush Limbaugh before him you cannot lie about what Charlie Kirk has said or what he believed. His opinions are out there for the world to hear.

Charlie in the last decade has given hundreds of interviews and participated in hundreds of debates. All of his opinions and ideas documented on video. Anything he has said that you believe was hate speech can just be located and pasted.

This is about his opinions not what some rainbow cretin thinks about him.

Almost all statements someone famous has made can be researched on the web for verification.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Kirk likely said some other things that people like me would not agree with but that is no excuse to shoot him down like a dog.

Like Christi Noem's dog?
No, I did not say he deserved to be shot for his wacky beliefs, just ignored

 

[mark francis]

Like Christi Noem's dog?
No, I did not say he deserved to be shot for his wacky beliefs, just ignored

You are right not to celebrate the leftist murder of Kirk like the majority of leftists think was the right thing to do.

 

[Boris Norris]

I find it almost unbelievable that the left incites and commits violence and then claims conservatives and republicans are the real ones propagating hatred and violence.

It was Trump who within hours of his death blamed the radical Marxist left for his death. How were democrats connected to his death?
That would appear hate to me sunshine.

Republicans claim Democrats can’t keep us safe – crime data disagrees

Studies show that states with higher murder rates are those that vote red even as conservatives stoke fear about crime

share.google

 

[mark francis]

It was Trump who within hours of his death blamed the radical Marxist left for his death. How were democrats connected to his death?
That would appear hate to me sunshine.

Republicans claim Democrats can’t keep us safe – crime data disagrees

Studies show that states with higher murder rates are those that vote red even as conservatives stoke fear about crime

share.google

Democrats supported and promoted the leftist ideology that convinced the shooter that Kirk was evil, racist, hateful, and/or fascist.

 

[PamiUSA]

"..Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

Kirk used his massively influential, billionaire-funded “young conservative organization” Turning Point USA to spread these hateful views on a grand scale to a rising generation of copycat, crypto-fascist, edgelord trolls. And now that he’s been publicly slain in a horrific assassination, President Donald Trump has hailed Kirk as a “wonderful American” and a “martyr for truth and freedom.” Trump, gay Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D), and others are flying flags at half-mast to commemorate him, and Kirk’s podcast bestie Gov. Gavin Newsom is telling people to “honor Charlie’s memory” by continuing his work.

..

“Choosing not to mourn someone who caused harm is not out of alignment with your spiritual beliefs,” she continued. “Grief is not a performance, and empathy is not an endless well. You are allowed to acknowledge limits. That doesn’t make you coldhearted, and it doesn’t mean you are wishing harm on anyone. It simply means you are being honest about your boundaries.⁣”


At this point, I’ve heard more sympathy from the president and media about Kirk’s murder than I’ve heard about school shooting victims regularly gunned down in their classrooms, thousands of Palestinian civilians slaughtered in Gaza, or Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman (D) being slain by a right-leaning assassin last June — as if Kirk’s life matters more than all of theirs. And then people wonder why some of us aren’t particularly saddened by the death of this one wealthy bigot.


We’re told we should be horrified because no one deserves to be murdered for their political beliefs, because Kirk’s killer is still at large, and because — in the words of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and countless others — “political violence has absolutely no place in our nation.”

But, as fellow journalist Hunter Walker pointed out yesterday, “Political violence has been a feature of American life from the Revolution, to the genocide of indigenous peoples, to slavery, mass lynching of Blacks and Latinos, the turmoil of the 60s, to mass shootings, to January 6, and Charlie Kirk’s killing.”

You’re telling me that I’m supposed to condemn the murder of a wealthy and politically super-connected bigot who spent every moment of his life actively vilifying and fomenting violence against the most marginalized among us, and then weep when his own hatred inevitably backfired against him?

Kirk’s murder is shocking, but no less shocking than the decades-long, state-sanctioned violence committed against whoever the police, the president, and other federal authorities consider to be worthy targets: We largely criminalize immigrants and the poor, neglect the sick and the old, and persecute those who protest for social justice, vilify them all as stupid and dangerous and then either jail them, mock them online, or otherwise leave them to rot.

We may not have viral video of these marginalized people being slaughtered (like Kirk was), but their brutalization and deaths — largely socially sanctioned and hidden away from public view — are no less horrific, brutal, or needless … and they’re far more worthy of social change pursued in their memory than the promised political retribution that’s about to erupt in Kirk’s memory.

You see, Kirk was part of a larger right-wing media echo-system that will continue to actively peddle violence and hate for dollars and clout. In that vein, just last night, President Trump used his own platform to blame leftists for Kirk’s death — even though investigators have yet to find the killer — and then promised to use the full power of his administration to find “those who contributed to [Kirk’s death] … including the organizations that fund it and support it.”

No, I won't be shedding any tears for Charlie Kirk - LGBTQ Nation

He spent his life fomenting hatred against me, my friends, and neighbors. And now we're supposed to fly flags at half-mast for him?

www.lgbtqnation.com

comrade stalin
moscow

That’s a lie!

Stephen King Apologizes for Claiming Charlie Kirk ‘Advocated Stoning Gays’: ‘This Is What I Get for Reading’ X Without ‘Fact-Checking’

Stephen King has apologized for saying that Charlie Kirk "advocated for stoning gays" without "fact-checking": "Won’t happen again.”

variety.com

 

[PamiUSA]

Kirk did indeed post that the Bible said that male gays should be stoned. I have seen it posted twice now.

Stephen King Apologizes for Claiming Charlie Kirk ‘Advocated Stoning Gays’: ‘This Is What I Get for Reading’ X Without ‘Fact-Checking’

Stephen King has apologized for saying that Charlie Kirk "advocated for stoning gays" without "fact-checking": "Won’t happen again.”

variety.com

 

[PamiUSA]

Stephen King Apologizes for Claiming Charlie Kirk ‘Advocated Stoning Gays’: ‘This Is What I Get for Reading’ X Without ‘Fact-Checking’

Stephen King has apologized for saying that Charlie Kirk "advocated for stoning gays" without "fact-checking": "Won’t happen again.”

variety.com

Charlie Kirk didn't say gay people should be stoned to death

The Turning Point USA co-founder and conservative commentator was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college.

www.snopes.com

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Charlie Kirk was nothing but a standard fundamentalist creep with a knack for using logical fallacies to bamboozle people even more ignorant than himself. Of course, he did not deserve to be executed, no one does.
But that does not mean that the country is not better off without him.

 

[mark francis]

Charlie Kirk was nothing but a standard fundamentalist creep with a knack for using logical fallacies to bamboozle people even more ignorant than himself. Of course, he did not deserve to be executed, no one does.
But that does not mean that the country is not better off without him.

I take that as a group assessment from the God-rejecting hedonist crowd.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

I take that as a group assessment from the God-rejecting hedonist crowd.

Nothing I post is a group anything.

 

[mark francis]

Nothing I post is a group anything.

Is group the wrong term? How about leftist 'tribe?'