Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death

Werbung:
So no apology here? Charlie never said that you liars.
\
You are ill versed in the meanings of words.

Kirk claimed that the Bible was written by God, and quoted this:
Leviticus 18:22 states, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." Additionally, Leviticus 20:13 reinforces this by declaring that if a man lies with another man as with a woman, both are guilty of a capital offense.
A capital offense is a death sentence, usually by decapitation.
 
So no apology here? Charlie never said that you liars.
\
You are ill versed in the meanings of words.

Kirk claimed that the Bible was written by God, and quoted this:
Leviticus 18:22 states, "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." Additionally, Leviticus 20:13 reinforces this by declaring that if a man lies with another man as with a woman, both are guilty of a capital offense.
A capital offense is a death sentence, usually by decapitation.
God has instructions in the Bible that applied to ancient Jews, and which do not apply to modern Christians
 
"..Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

Kirk used his massively influential, billionaire-funded “young conservative organization” Turning Point USA to spread these hateful views on a grand scale to a rising generation of copycat, crypto-fascist, edgelord trolls. And now that he’s been publicly slain in a horrific assassination, President Donald Trump has hailed Kirk as a “wonderful American” and a “martyr for truth and freedom.” Trump, gay Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D), and others are flying flags at half-mast to commemorate him, and Kirk’s podcast bestie Gov. Gavin Newsom is telling people to “honor Charlie’s memory” by continuing his work.

..

“Choosing not to mourn someone who caused harm is not out of alignment with your spiritual beliefs,” she continued. “Grief is not a performance, and empathy is not an endless well. You are allowed to acknowledge limits. That doesn’t make you coldhearted, and it doesn’t mean you are wishing harm on anyone. It simply means you are being honest about your boundaries.⁣”


At this point, I’ve heard more sympathy from the president and media about Kirk’s murder than I’ve heard about school shooting victims regularly gunned down in their classrooms, thousands of Palestinian civilians slaughtered in Gaza, or Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman (D) being slain by a right-leaning assassin last June — as if Kirk’s life matters more than all of theirs. And then people wonder why some of us aren’t particularly saddened by the death of this one wealthy bigot.


We’re told we should be horrified because no one deserves to be murdered for their political beliefs, because Kirk’s killer is still at large, and because — in the words of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and countless others — “political violence has absolutely no place in our nation.”

But, as fellow journalist Hunter Walker pointed out yesterday, “Political violence has been a feature of American life from the Revolution, to the genocide of indigenous peoples, to slavery, mass lynching of Blacks and Latinos, the turmoil of the 60s, to mass shootings, to January 6, and Charlie Kirk’s killing.”

You’re telling me that I’m supposed to condemn the murder of a wealthy and politically super-connected bigot who spent every moment of his life actively vilifying and fomenting violence against the most marginalized among us, and then weep when his own hatred inevitably backfired against him?

Kirk’s murder is shocking, but no less shocking than the decades-long, state-sanctioned violence committed against whoever the police, the president, and other federal authorities consider to be worthy targets: We largely criminalize immigrants and the poor, neglect the sick and the old, and persecute those who protest for social justice, vilify them all as stupid and dangerous and then either jail them, mock them online, or otherwise leave them to rot.

We may not have viral video of these marginalized people being slaughtered (like Kirk was), but their brutalization and deaths — largely socially sanctioned and hidden away from public view — are no less horrific, brutal, or needless … and they’re far more worthy of social change pursued in their memory than the promised political retribution that’s about to erupt in Kirk’s memory.

You see, Kirk was part of a larger right-wing media echo-system that will continue to actively peddle violence and hate for dollars and clout. In that vein, just last night, President Trump used his own platform to blame leftists for Kirk’s death — even though investigators have yet to find the killer — and then promised to use the full power of his administration to find “those who contributed to [Kirk’s death] … including the organizations that fund it and support it.”


comrade stalin
moscow
 
God has instructions in the Bible that applied to ancient Jews, and which do not apply to modern Christians
So God, who has always had all the Truth on his side wanted to stone homosexuals in 300 BC, but somehow God change his mind entirely because by 33 AD, God who has always known everything forever, changed his mind.

Slavery and polygamy were OK even in Jesus' time, but somehow they no longer are.
Black people, of course, are due to the color of their skins, should not be piloting aircraft. No doubt Jesus would have agreed.
 
So no apology here? Charlie never said that you liars.

"..Charlie Kirk believed that gay people should be stoned to death, that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a “huge mistake,” that we should legally be allowed to whip foreigners in the U.S., that Muslims only move here to destroy the country, that American Jews encourage anti-whiteness, that men should physically attack transgender people, that all women should submit to their husbands, and that Black professionals “steal” their jobs from more qualified white people.

Kirk used his massively influential, billionaire-funded “young conservative organization” Turning Point USA to spread these hateful views on a grand scale to a rising generation of copycat, crypto-fascist, edgelord trolls. And now that he’s been publicly slain in a horrific assassination, President Donald Trump has hailed Kirk as a “wonderful American” and a “martyr for truth and freedom.” Trump, gay Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D), and others are flying flags at half-mast to commemorate him, and Kirk’s podcast bestie Gov. Gavin Newsom is telling people to “honor Charlie’s memory” by continuing his work.

..

“Choosing not to mourn someone who caused harm is not out of alignment with your spiritual beliefs,” she continued. “Grief is not a performance, and empathy is not an endless well. You are allowed to acknowledge limits. That doesn’t make you coldhearted, and it doesn’t mean you are wishing harm on anyone. It simply means you are being honest about your boundaries.⁣”


At this point, I’ve heard more sympathy from the president and media about Kirk’s murder than I’ve heard about school shooting victims regularly gunned down in their classrooms, thousands of Palestinian civilians slaughtered in Gaza, or Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman (D) being slain by a right-leaning assassin last June — as if Kirk’s life matters more than all of theirs. And then people wonder why some of us aren’t particularly saddened by the death of this one wealthy bigot.


We’re told we should be horrified because no one deserves to be murdered for their political beliefs, because Kirk’s killer is still at large, and because — in the words of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and countless others — “political violence has absolutely no place in our nation.”

But, as fellow journalist Hunter Walker pointed out yesterday, “Political violence has been a feature of American life from the Revolution, to the genocide of indigenous peoples, to slavery, mass lynching of Blacks and Latinos, the turmoil of the 60s, to mass shootings, to January 6, and Charlie Kirk’s killing.”

You’re telling me that I’m supposed to condemn the murder of a wealthy and politically super-connected bigot who spent every moment of his life actively vilifying and fomenting violence against the most marginalized among us, and then weep when his own hatred inevitably backfired against him?

Kirk’s murder is shocking, but no less shocking than the decades-long, state-sanctioned violence committed against whoever the police, the president, and other federal authorities consider to be worthy targets: We largely criminalize immigrants and the poor, neglect the sick and the old, and persecute those who protest for social justice, vilify them all as stupid and dangerous and then either jail them, mock them online, or otherwise leave them to rot.

We may not have viral video of these marginalized people being slaughtered (like Kirk was), but their brutalization and deaths — largely socially sanctioned and hidden away from public view — are no less horrific, brutal, or needless … and they’re far more worthy of social change pursued in their memory than the promised political retribution that’s about to erupt in Kirk’s memory.

You see, Kirk was part of a larger right-wing media echo-system that will continue to actively peddle violence and hate for dollars and clout. In that vein, just last night, President Trump used his own platform to blame leftists for Kirk’s death — even though investigators have yet to find the killer — and then promised to use the full power of his administration to find “those who contributed to [Kirk’s death] … including the organizations that fund it and support it.”


comrade stalin
moscow
That’s a lie!!!
 
So God, who has always had all the Truth on his side wanted to stone homosexuals in 300 BC, but somehow God change his mind entirely because by 33 AD, God who has always known everything forever, changed his mind.

Slavery and polygamy were OK even in Jesus' time, but somehow they no longer are.
Black people, of course, are due to the color of their skins, should not be piloting aircraft. No doubt Jesus would have agreed.
God still opposes fornication and sexual perversions. How He handled and will handle sins, both in the past and in the present and future, is His business.
 
Charlie realized that big bucks could not be made by
God still opposes fornication and sexual perversions. How He handled and will handle sins, both in the past and in the present and future, is His business.
You have no clue what "God" will do.
Jesus said this:
"Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. "Matthew 5:17. How can you say that there was a "new covenant"? That was Paul's idea, because Paul found it easier to convert pagans than Jews.

It was necessary to abolish the need for circumcision because pagan men did not want some priest messing with their peckers, and although church ladies are always helpful, me controlled the money.
 
Charlie realized that big bucks could not be made by

You have no clue what "God" will do.
Jesus said this:
"Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. "Matthew 5:17. How can you say that there was a "new covenant"? That was Paul's idea, because Paul found it easier to convert pagans than Jews.


It was necessary to abolish the need for circumcision because pagan men did not want some priest messing with their peckers, and although church ladies are always helpful, me controlled the money.
I again implore you to seek God's help and understanding to be delivered from false teachings.
 
How about you just put a sock in it, dolt
Hypocrisy! What they run on is not what they believe! So why didn’t she pick Pete? 🧐😏🥴 She underestimated Americans! Think of how many are gay in our government that are hush hush on both sides! Harris is a woman “black” she states etc… but the hypocrisy is sickening! Trump at least you know where he stands no matter what one thinks of him!

 
Hypocrisy! What they run on is not what they believe! So why didn’t she pick Pete? 🧐😏🥴 She underestimated Americans! Think of how many are gay in our government that are hush hush on both sides! Harris is a woman “black” she states etc… but the hypocrisy is sickening! Trump at least you know where he stands no matter what one thinks of him!

Kackles was desperate to circle back around and (as Psaki says) and name a rather dull-witted white guy to win what she stupidly thought were millions of rather dull-witted white voters.

1758641251757.webp

1758641342375.webp
 
Werbung:
Back
Top