Do NOT recognize Armenian genocide!

Claiming that large swathes of the earth are inherently bad, violent, lesser or any other kind of people because of their genetic make-up is exactly the kind of thinking which causes such genocides. Do you not see that?
 
Werbung:
Claiming that large swathes of the earth are inherently bad, violent, lesser or any other kind of people because of their genetic make-up is exactly the kind of thinking which causes such genocides. Do you not see that?
I don't see that at all. To recognize the reality of their behavior does not mean one wishes to participate in their animalistic behavior!
 
Claiming that large swathes of the earth are inherently bad, violent, lesser or any other kind of people because of their genetic make-up is exactly the kind of thinking which causes such genocides. Do you not see that?


would you feel better if they simply chose to be perpetually crabby ? I suppose it realy doesnt matter the cause but there is no denying the simple truth. if it makes you feel better, you neednt be muslim just be from there. maybe its in the water...

or the dna.
 
would you feel better if they simply chose to be perpetually crabby ? I suppose it realy doesnt matter the cause but there is no denying the simple truth. if it makes you feel better, you neednt be muslim just be from there. maybe its in the water...

or the dna.
It's brainwashing ....
Call it what it is!
 
The mass-murder of Armenians is a documented fact. Various governments want to prevent free speech. Stuff 'em!
 
Claiming that large swathes of the earth are inherently bad, violent, lesser or any other kind of people because of their genetic make-up is exactly the kind of thinking which causes such genocides. Do you not see that?

So your saying that a person's behavior is not part of their DNA?
 
Arnold Toynbee recorded that more than 1,000,000 were deported from the Ottoman Empire and only 500,000 of those deportees survived and a Turkish academic claimed that 438,000 ethnic Armenians were deported and there were 382,000 survivors. There may have been some elements of British wartime propaganda against the Central Powers and his death toll estimates may not be entirely accurate. The British Empire was engaging in the Gallipoli Campaign in the same period when the Ottoman Parliament passed the deportation law in 1915 and Toynbee only relied on eyewitnesses inside the Ottoman Empire to write the Blue Book and eyewitness accounts are often exaggerated.

In 1916 the British Parliament published a "Blue Book" that identified the events of 1915-16 as a systematic effort to exterminate the Armenian people. The Blue Book has been one of the most solid and influential sources on the Armenian Genocide. A critical, uncensored edition, edited and with an introduction by Ara Sarafian, has now been published by the Gomidas Institute. Viscount James Bryce and Arnold Toynbee were commissioned to prepare the Blue Book, which is formally known as "The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, 1915-1916." Toynbee carefully compiled and verified dozens of eyewitness accounts from different parts of the Ottoman Empire. These accounts provided the basis for Bryce's brilliant thesis on the Genocide, published while the crime was still in progress. Sarafian has located Toynbee's original manuscript, Toynbee's correspondence with his sources, and most of the original reports, which were copied and sent to London. They can still be found at the Public Record Office (Kew), Bodleian Library (Oxford), National Archives (Washington, D.C.), Library of Congress (Washington, D.C.), and the Houghton Library (Cambridge, Mass.) He has established that the compilers were meticulous in their verification of sources.
 
The Armenian genocide is well documented. The problem with word is how do you mesure it. It is not race destruction because all the races involved survive but in much smaller numbers. There have been many similar events in Germany, Cambodia, and Africa. Even the destruction of most of the Aboriginal setters in Australia and North America could be call genocide.
 
Even the destruction of most of the Aboriginal setters in Australia and North America could be call genocide.

Speak for yourself. There are more North American native populations today, than there were back when the white man came here. Far more natives murdered each other, than what the white man killed. Even though they no longer wear buckskin, live in tee pees or on reservations, doesn't mean they don't exist.
 
Cruella, I am pleased to hear that> I afraid the Australian aboriginals are in fewer numbers than before the white man arrive. They also live mainly in the desert wheeras they were all over Australian once. I am still not sure this can be called genocide because it was never the intention to destroy the race and most6 were killed by diseases we whites brought in to which they had no immunity.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top