Does Christine Odonnel represent your views?

Werbung:
Awww .... did she talk about witches in high school? Is that worse than having a cokehead as president? :p
 
pocketfullofshells said:
no, not mine, because unlike her , I actually know what the first amendment says...what a Freaking Blithering idiot she is
Click to expand...

As usual you have been played by the left media. Its so easy for the MSM to fool libs and moderates...they will believe anything the MSM tells them. How else does America elect a Marxist to the presidency???

She is so much dumber than Fat Al Franken, Lil John F-ing Kerry, Chucky Schumer, Barbara (dumb as a box of rocks) Boxer, Dingy Harry Reid, CornHusker Kickback Ben Nelson, Lying Jumpin Joe Biden, Queen of Pork Patty Murray, etc.................thinks a DF lib.

Here is something you libs have likely not seen....

 
Shes a sexy babe. Men will be tested here. Now if she loses it will mean WOMEN ARE DUMB Because they Re-Elected Bill Clinton back in 1996 because over sex looks he had. Men dont go sex looks unlikie woman do!
 
WOMEN ARE DUMB Because they Re-Elected Bill Clinton back in 1996 because over sex looks he had. Men dont go sex looks unlikie woman do!
Click to expand...

Yep, that pretty much sums up the intellect of lib women, what they look for in a man, and what they get in a man. no substance.
 
pocketfullofshells said:
no, not mine, because unlike her , I actually know what the first amendment says...what a Freaking Blithering idiot she is
Click to expand...

Actually, she was right in the debate, and Combs was wrong. The phrase "separation of Church and State" doesn't appear in the 1st amendment, nor anywhere in the Constitution. Not anywhere in any Federal law, in fact. Nor is there any law requiring the concept behind it. That was news to Combs... and to most of the media in attendance, it seems.

If your view doesn't match hers, then that leaves you sucking hind tit. As usual.
 
Interestingly, the "Wall of separation between church and state" that Jefferson referred to in a letter to a friend (the only place that phrase was ever used by any Framer), was not there to prevent government from being affected by church doctrine. It was there to prevent the church from being contaminated by government.
 
Little-Acorn said:
Actually, she was right in the debate, and Combs was wrong. The phrase "separation of Church and State" doesn't appear in the 1st amendment, nor anywhere in the Constitution. Not anywhere in any Federal law, in fact. Nor is there any law requiring the concept behind it. That was news to Combs... and to most of the media in attendance, it seems.

If your view doesn't match hers, then that leaves you sucking hind tit. As usual.
Click to expand...

Over 100 years of Supreme Court decisions overrules your view.
 
Little-Acorn said:
Interestingly, the "Wall of separation between church and state" that Jefferson referred to in a letter to a friend (the only place that phrase was ever used by any Framer), was not there to prevent government from being affected by church doctrine. It was there to prevent the church from being contaminated by government.
Click to expand...

What part of "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" do you not understand?

"To messers Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.

Gentlemen

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. [Congress thus inhibited from acts respecting religion, and the Executive authorised only to execute their acts, I have refrained from prescribing even those occasional performances of devotion, practiced indeed by the Executive of another nation as the legal head of its church, but subject here, as religious exercises only to the voluntary regulations and discipline of each respective sect.] Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association assurances of my high respect & esteem.

(signed) Thomas Jefferson
Jan.1.1802."
 
Werbung:
A girl who i knew says we need more high paying salaries in order to survive. Then i said ,,Well that what men are for to support you,, And she says now what if i cant find a decent man? then I said,, well maybe you should change your figure. She poured her beer all over on me.:mad:
 

Similar threads

C
Bob Etheridge.....Goin Crazy....Punishment?
Replies
1
Views
896
bododie
B
steveox
Christine ODonnell blames Karl Rove her loss not endorsing her
Replies
0
Views
1K
steveox
steveox
K
Bloomberg won't disarm his security team
Replies
1
Views
1K
steveox
steveox
PLC1
Do race and gender matter in enforcing the law?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Texas_tea
Texas_tea
XCALIDEM
MSNBC playing the"race card"
Replies
6
Views
1K
asur
asur
Back
Top