Federal judge rules $1.7 trillion spending bill passed by Congress in 2022 is unconstitutional

Tripoli

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2024
Messages
1,881
LOL everything the demokraps do is unconstitutional

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fe...bill-passed-congress-2022-is-unconstitutional

A Lubbock, Texas, federal judge ruled Tuesday that lawmakers unconstitutionally passed the $1.7 trillion government funding bill in 2022 when they did so under a pandemic-era rule allowing members of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote on the matter by proxy instead of in person.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, requested the courts block a provision of the funding bill that gave pregnant workers stronger legal protections.

U.S. District Judge Wesley Hendrix reviewed the request and issued a "limited" ruling on one of two provisions Paxton sought to have blocked.
 
Werbung:
Local yokul texas judge rules something
Right wing moron thinks that means something lol
 
LOL everything the demokraps do is unconstitutional

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fe...bill-passed-congress-2022-is-unconstitutional

A Lubbock, Texas, federal judge ruled Tuesday that lawmakers unconstitutionally passed the $1.7 trillion government funding bill in 2022 when they did so under a pandemic-era rule allowing members of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote on the matter by proxy instead of in person.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, requested the courts block a provision of the funding bill that gave pregnant workers stronger legal protections.

U.S. District Judge Wesley Hendrix reviewed the request and issued a "limited" ruling on one of two provisions Paxton sought to have blocked.
Everything? Lol
God u r dumb
 
federal trial and appeals courts in Washington, DC, previously rejected a lawsuit challenging proxy voting in the House, brought by then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The US Supreme Court declined to take up McCarthy’s case.

Scotus isn't worried about proxy voting. This is just more right wing whining
 
federal trial and appeals courts in Washington, DC, previously rejected a lawsuit challenging proxy voting in the House, brought by then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The US Supreme Court declined to take up McCarthy’s case.

Scotus isn't worried about proxy voting. This is just more right wing whining
LOL so we elect a congress and senate to vote, but they do not have to vote as anyone can vote in their place. If this is true the government and constitution no longer exist. So thanks for proving my entire point
 
LOL so we elect a congress and senate to vote, but they do not have to vote as anyone can vote in their place. If this is true the government and constitution no longer exist. So thanks for proving my entire point

no, "anyone" can't vote in their place
only their proxy can.
thanks for proving you say the dumbest things.
 
And the proxy can be anyone

You need mental help

as if they would choose just anyone? lol.
why would any logical and intelligent person object to someone choosing a trusted proxy to vote for them? duh.
it happens all the time in real life.
 
as if they would choose just anyone? lol.
why would any logical and intelligent person object to someone choosing a trusted proxy to vote for them? duh.
it happens all the time in real life.
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa because democraps have no intelligence

Bada bing bada boom
 
Werbung:
LOL everything the demokraps do is unconstitutional

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fe...bill-passed-congress-2022-is-unconstitutional

A Lubbock, Texas, federal judge ruled Tuesday that lawmakers unconstitutionally passed the $1.7 trillion government funding bill in 2022 when they did so under a pandemic-era rule allowing members of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote on the matter by proxy instead of in person.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, requested the courts block a provision of the funding bill that gave pregnant workers stronger legal protections.

U.S. District Judge Wesley Hendrix reviewed the request and issued a "limited" ruling on one of two provisions Paxton sought to have blocked.
Finally, an American judge willing to stop the leftist spending madness.
 
Back
Top