Feds discover skinheads plan to kill Obama

[9sublime]

Not to be disrespectful, but you've GOT to be kidding me?!!!

Obama stands for SOCIALISM! Here is a quote from him...

“IT’S A TRAGEDY THE CONSTITUTION WASN’T RADICALLY REINTERPRETED TO FORCE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS…AND IT’S STILL AN ISSUE TODAY.”

Tell me EXACTLY in detail, how you think that he is going to help us? You aren't in the States are you? How would you know what would help us??


Again, not to be rude, but geez, I would NEVER make a statement about what would be good for another nation...

You would never make a statement about what is good for another nation? Did you support bringing democracy to Iraq at any point?

 

[Libsmasher]

Kennedy and obama are poles apart. By merely saying they both stood for great change, you could also say obama is another hitler.

Kennedy stood for the equal protection of the law, obama stands for anti-white discrimination, the racial spoils system, and "identity politics".

Kennedy was one of the biggest enemies of communism ever, Obama surrounded himself with marxists his whole adult life.

Kennedy famously triggered great economic grown by cutting taxes, obama will greatly increase them.

Kennedy was renowned for his inaugural statement of opposing enemies of democracy everywhere in the world, obama is an appeaser.

 

[Octoldit]

Yet another example of the conniving schemes and tricks the Republicans resort to in a vain attempt to deceive the American people. If it's not gas holiday's, its suspending campaigns, it's Skin heads assassins out to kill black people, or workers with letters carved into their face. It's all disgusting. McCain, Bush, and all the tyrannical traitors are pathological liars.

Their is no integrity in them....none. they are far from being qualified for the office of the presidency they are "professional criminals".

They will say anything as if they were speaking to a bunch of children who don't have the experience to know when they are being lied too.

The republican ticket is a disgrace; they are part of the false-flag operation called 9-11 this communist/terrorist plot financed by the international/Zionist bankers to overthrow the American Government is their agenda, not preserving America. They want to erase the Constitution just as they did with the Bolshevik revolution in Russia erasing the Russian monarchy.

What they have not revealed is that GWB, McCain, the secret societies, portions of the F.B.I. and C.I.A, most of the republicans and greedy multinational corporations are all part of the plot to overthrow the rights, laws, and freedoms we have under the Constitution.

The greedy traitors don’t care about Laws, integrity, human life, or the American people. Their madness and greed has blinded them. These people are extremely dangerous. They want to do the same things in America they do in Iraq, south and Central America, and the world. They hate our freedom and spy on us through the hijacked N.S.A. to try and preserve their tyranny.

 

[Andy]

I've always said, if Obama wins, some racists and right wing nuts are going to be very angry. As a result, I can see him going the same way as Kennedy. Carrying immense promise. Horrible thought isn't it.

I would agree accept for the immense promise. He's actually made very little promise. Not even sure what he stands for on half the issues.

 

[Andy]

Obama does carry immense promise for change, a new style of government that thinks through its actions a bit better I think.

Yeah, a guy who has flip flopped on nearly every major international issue... a new style of government indeed. It's known as the Clinton style ad hoc system.

 

[Pandora]

Obama does carry immense promise for change, a new style of government that thinks through its actions a bit better I think.

he offers the change to socialism, that is so disgusting. I guess he sounds good to you, if possible i would shove him and his wife in a box and mail him to you, and you can live under his rule.

he offers nothing here that is good for our country

reading what you said literally makes my skin crawl

 

[Pandora]

Kennedy and obama are poles apart. By merely saying they both stood for great change, you could also say obama is another hitler.

Kennedy stood for the equal protection of the law, obama stands for anti-white discrimination, the racial spoils system, and "identity politics".

Kennedy was one of the biggest enemies of communism ever, Obama surrounded himself with marxists his whole adult life.

Kennedy famously triggered great economic grown by cutting taxes, obama will greatly increase them.

Kennedy was renowned for his inaugural statement of opposing enemies of democracy everywhere in the world, obama is an appeaser.

that is funny when you think about it

they love to compare him to kennedy who was more conservative than anyone running today and who is so unlike obama it isnt even funny but if you comprare him to someone he actually does have qualities of, then thats bad

 

[Octoldit]

Someone always makes an attempt on the President. I would say you will win that bet. I have faith in the Secret Service however.

"Someone always makes an attempt on the President" This statement is extremely political doubletalk and very dangerous. Tell everyone since Bush is a known puppet of these same intruders what attempts have been made against him?

Also would you like to inform everyone on what gives you so much faith in a Secret Service that has been merged into the so-called Department of Homeland security, which is headed by a known Zionist?

 

[Pandora]

"Someone always makes an attempt on the President" This statement is extremely political doubletalk and very dangerous. Tell everyone since Bush is a known puppet of these same intruders what attempts have been made against him?

Also would you like to inform everyone on what gives you so much faith in a Secret Service that has been merged into the so-called Department of Homeland security, which is headed by a known Zionist?

What is wrong with a zionist? doesnt that just mean someone who thinks Israel has a right to exist and not be wiped out? and who is this zionist you are talking about
and yeah i am sure there have been plots against bush as well as every other president ever elected except for maybe Washington

 

[XCALIDEM]

What is wrong with a zionist? doesnt that just mean someone who thinks Israel has a right to exist and not be wiped out? and who is this zionist you are talking about
and yeah i am sure there have been plots against bush as well as every other president ever elected except for maybe Washington

He probably doesn't know the meaning of that word, but here I'm as you411 guy....

Main Entry: Zi·on·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈzī-ə-ˌni-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1896
: an international movement originally for the establishment of a Jewish national or religious community in Palestine and later for the support of modern Israel
— Zi·on·ist \-nist\ adjective or noun
— Zi·on·is·tic \ˌzī-ə-ˈnis-tik\ adjective

 

[pocketfullofshells]

well everyone on the left read popeyes posts and they think McCain is riddled with cancer and will die any day now so they dont have to try and off him like they tried with Ronald Reagan and Ford

umm one you give poppey to much credit and this site...and no the left does not think that. You may recall I went after him for it a few times.

 

[Pandora]

He probably doesn't know the meaning of that word, but here I'm as you411 guy....

So I am right?

A person who supports Israels right to exist? and not be driven into the sea as the reject from Iran would like

I am a zionist too

 

[pocketfullofshells]

Not to be disrespectful, but you've GOT to be kidding me?!!!

Obama stands for SOCIALISM! Here is a quote from him...

“IT’S A TRAGEDY THE CONSTITUTION WASN’T RADICALLY REINTERPRETED TO FORCE REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS…AND IT’S STILL AN ISSUE TODAY.”

Tell me EXACTLY in detail, how you think that he is going to help us? You aren't in the States are you? How would you know what would help us??


Again, not to be rude, but geez, I would NEVER make a statement about what would be good for another nation...

Now go get the real quote and post it

I am sure that would be hard, so here is the full quote
" If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I'd be okay.

But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you, it says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.
"

I am sorry did the real quote, not selectivly cut off when you wanted change the meaning of what the quote was?

McCain has no dignity left, its sad to wach what was a good man, go down like this in a way.

 

[Pandora]

Now go get the real quote and post it

I am sure that would be hard, so here is the full quote
" If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I'd be okay.

But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you, it says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.
"

I am sorry did the real quote, not selectivly cut off when you wanted change the meaning of what the quote was?

McCain has no dignity left, its sad to wach what was a good man, go down like this in a way.

i am glad you posted the whole thing. the whole thing is disgusting. Everyone should read

 

[Andy]

Now go get the real quote and post it

I am sure that would be hard, so here is the full quote
" If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I'd be okay.

But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you, it says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn't shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that."

I am sorry did the real quote, not selectivly cut off when you wanted change the meaning of what the quote was?

Granted this is the actual quote. But as far as I can tell, it says the same thing. He would prefer to have the courts reinterpret the constitution to mean things that it never was meant to mean.

In all honesty, this is perfect poetic justice. What has happened is, people have reinterpreted his comments to mean exactly what he meant.

He is however, wrong. The court did radically change the way the constitution is used, from what was intended. The constitution is not a list of negative liberties. It is a list of positive government mandates, with everything else assumed negative. The constitution was never a list of what we the people, can or can not do, but rather a list of specific things the government is supposed to do, and everything else is assumed not.

For example, the government is supposed to build and fund a military for the protection of the entire nation. The government does not have any constitutional right to run a social security program. The government is supposed to regulate interstate commerce. The government does not have any constitutional right to control or dictate education. The government is supposed to write, sign, and maintain trade and treaties with other nations. The government does not have any constitutional right to fund health care.

Thus, if you read the constitution, the way it was written, most of the current government spending is unconstitutional. Most of what are major issues in our politics today, would never have been even allowed to be considered by the founding fathers. And most of the problems we have are caused by us not following our own constitution.

People get bent by the idea government is becoming more oppressive, and the Patriot act is eroding our freedoms and so on. Yet the biggest danger to our freedoms is people simply ignoring what the constitution says. And right now, the front runner on doing that, is Obama.

When you grant the government the ability to ignore our constitution because you want free health care, you have also granted them the ability to trample your freedoms. You can not say we need to reinterpret this little part so we can get free health care, but not reinterpret this part and lose freedom of speech. You might try that, but once you allow 'reinterpreting' to mean whatever you want, the same people are going to change everything else as well.

McCain has no dignity left, its sad to wach what was a good man, go down like this in a way.

Huh. He does not think he doesn't have dignity. All the people voting for him, don't think he doesn't have dignity. So basically this is hearsay.

Obama has no dignity left, it is sad to watch what never was a good man, do down like this is a way.

Don't you love these pointless exchanges of unsupportable opinion?