I have the answer to the student loan problem

[pjmret]

Lack of verification works both ways. Democrats claim republicans could not prove all these facts indicate fraud yet Democrats also provide no support for claiming the evidence does not suggest fraud.

even republicans in red states laughed at your "evidence" because it wasn't credible.

your obsession with democrats needs some mental health therapy. lol

 

[pjmret]

If the list of names proves nothing then how can Democrats claim they have proof that no fraud occurred. Either they should admit they don't know how many illegals voted or they should stop falsely claiming the evidence shows that no fraud occurred.

yawn, no one ever said "no fraud occurred". tiny amounts of fraud occur in every election.

you're a *****. lol

 

[mark francis]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/15/2020-election-trump-false-fraud-claims/

More.

Republicans Increasingly Realize There’s No Evidence Of Election Fraud—But Most Still Think 2020 Election Was Stolen Anyway, Poll Finds

Nearly half of those who believe Biden didn’t actually win the election now say they’re going on suspicion alone.

www.forbes.com

And more again. https://rantt.com/a-definitive-debunking-of-the-big-lie.

Had enough yet sookie?

Your spokespeople supporting the fraud coverup provide no proof to support their voter fraud denials.

 

[pjmret]

Your spokespeople supporting the fraud coverup provide no proof to support their voter fraud denials.

there was no fraud coverup, *****. lol.

you morons provide no credible proof there was fraud.

 

[mark francis]

But they were investigated by GOP paid auditors. You keep forgetting that.


What factual evidence do you have there was fraud? You've been belching this crap for two years but show nothing that was examined by the authorities. Just right wing sponsored dribbles of hate and sour grapes, just like you.

They aren't and never have.
Why wasn't the fraud detected when Trump won? Suddenly upon defeat you start crying you were robbed. Grow up idiot.

Here is what was reported:

1. ■ 3,987 noncitizens voted.
2.■ 2,479 voters moved to another state or foreign country in the month preceding the election.
3. ■ 21,142 people voted twice.
4. ■ 1,506 dead people voted.

Noncitizens voting is election fraud.
Voting in a precinct in which the voter no longer lives is election fraud.
Double voting is election fraud.
dead people voting is election fraud.

Yet Democrats continue to stupidly and dishonestly insist there is no evidence of election fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Here is what was reported:

1. ■ 3,987 noncitizens voted.
2.■ 2,479 voters moved to another state or foreign country in the month preceding the election.
3. ■ 21,142 people voted twice.
4. ■ 1,506 dead people voted.

Noncitizens voting is election fraud.
Voting in a precinct in which the voter no longer lives is election fraud.
Double voting is election fraud.
dead people voting is election fraud.

Yet Democrats continue to stupidly and dishonestly insist there is no evidence of election fraud.

who said there is "NO" election fraud, *****? lol. there is always tiny fraud.

btw - anyone can "report" something, *****. the problem is that you morons couldn't PROVE anything. duh

 

[mark francis]

Because there was none once they received the licence. Why can't you accept your wrong.

They were longer illegals. Possibly you should stop suggesting massive fraud with no evidence to support it.

Illegals cannot legally vote, with or without a license or with or without a voter registration.

 

[mark francis]

But they weren't illegitimate. Are you so stupid you can't comprehend that?
How do you know for certain how many votes were cast? You don't. You're a liar.

Did Wisconsin change voting laws making it possible for voters to bypass state photo ID requirements? Absolutely, even though Democrats claim few if any voters voted illegitimately by wrongfully taking advantage of the loophole that allowed bypassing the photo ID requirement. Nevertheless, it seems hundreds of thousands of voters possibly abused the newly created loophole to vote in 2020 before the court later shot down the loophole as illegitimate.

 

[mark francis]

all you morons need is proof of that number.

but thanks for admitting you lied, you fake christian lying *****

The state elections officials did not dispute that number so why are you?

 

[pjmret]

Did Wisconsin change voting laws making it possible for voters to bypass state photo ID requirements? Absolutely, even though Democrats claim few if any voters voted illegitimately by wrongfully taking advantage of the loophole that allowed bypassing the photo ID requirement. Nevertheless, it seems hundreds of thousands of voters possibly abused the newly created loophole to vote in 2020 before the court later shot down the loophole as illegitimate.

"possibly" lol.

that's the problem, you morons have no proof of anything that actually went wrong.

which is why you lost every court case.

 

[mark francis]

no, they were indicted for taking the law into their own hands and breaking laws. there are legal ways to investigate fraud. they chose to be criminals.

you are always making excuses for right wing criminals. lol

When Democrats use leftist laws and courts to block investigations into voting fraud then they appear justified to arrest anyone attempting to properly investigate voting fraud in violation of their carefully crafted obstructions to those investigations.

 

[pjmret]

The state elections officials did not dispute that number so why are you?

i'm not "disputing" anything, i'm asking you to prove it.

and the fact that state officials didn't "dispute" something doesn't mean its true *****. Usually it means there is no value to disputing something because there is no proof it is valid to start with.

state officials have better things to do than pandering to you morons

 

[pjmret]

When Democrats use leftist laws and courts to block investigations into voting fraud then they appear justified to arrest anyone attempting to properly investigate voting fraud in violation of their carefully crafted obstructions to those investigations.

even trump appointed judges rejected your stupidity. are they also "leftist" *****? lol

 

[mark francis]

i dismiss your "evidence" since no independent person found it credible. lol.

red states certified their elections because you morons had no credible evidence.

you expect americans to blindlyl and stupidly accept your lies. lol

Thousands of rubes, crooks, and partisans may claim voting fraud evidence is not credible but until they present persuasive evidence to support their unsupported fraud denials they are just blowing smoke.

 

[mark francis]

let me know when you can read minds and prove evil intent. or have any evidence of same.

There was no evidence of a need to read minds to draw logical and accurate conclusions.