I have the answer to the student loan problem

[pjmret]

Thousands of rubes, crooks, and partisans may claim voting fraud evidence is not credible but until they present persuasive evidence to support their unsupported fraud denials they are just blowing smoke.

no, *****. if you claim fraud, you need to prove it.
until then, you are just..morons. lol

 

[mark francis]

even republicans in red states laughed at your "evidence" because it wasn't credible.

your obsession with democrats needs some mental health therapy. lol

If the hyenas can stop laughing long enough tell them they must provide reasonable support for their blind rejections of voting fraud evidence.

 

[mark francis]

yawn, no one ever said "no fraud occurred". tiny amounts of fraud occur in every election.

you're a *****. lol

You have no idea how much fraud occurred because your exposure to the facts has been shown to be quite limited.

 

[pjmret]

If the hyenas can stop laughing long enough tell them they must provide reasonable support for their blind rejections of voting fraud evidence.

it wasn't blind rejection, *****.
the evidence was examined and found not credible by every judge, by trump's own dhs and doj, and every red state. lol

you're a *****.

 

[pjmret]

You have no idea how much fraud occurred because your exposure to the facts has been shown to be quite limited.

says the ***** whose "evidence' was rejected by every court, every state, and trump's own dhs and doj.

why isn't fox news running your "evidence" 24x7? because even they admitted the election wasn't stolen. lol. if you can't get fox on your side, you know you are morons.

 

[mark francis]

there was no fraud coverup, *****. lol.

you morons provide no credible proof there was fraud.

You claim the massive number of mistakes in the 2020 election were not caused by evil intent to defraud, but you do not prove your rejections of the evidence are based upon facts.

 

[mark francis]

who said there is "NO" election fraud, *****? lol. there is always tiny fraud.

btw - anyone can "report" something, *****. the problem is that you morons couldn't PROVE anything. duh

The number of questioned ballots in the 2020 election is massive. You have not proven these numbers do not represent voter fraud on a massive scale.

 

[pjmret]

You claim the massive number of mistakes in the 2020 election were not caused by evil intent to defraud, but you do not prove your rejections of the evidence are based upon facts.

except you have to prove your claims, *****, with credible evidence.
and you failed.
that's how the system works, *****.
you are a *****.

 

[pjmret]

The number of questioned ballots in the 2020 election is massive. You have not proven these numbers do not represent voter fraud on a massive scale.

oh, you morons questioned massive numbers of ballots, that's true.
but you are morons.

credible independent people didn't.
which is why you lost every court case.

 

[mark francis]

"possibly" lol.

that's the problem, you morons have no proof of anything that actually went wrong.

which is why you lost every court case.

Republicans have failed to prove the questionable ballots were illegally cast with evil intent, but Democrats have no business accepting questionable ballots as legitimate without an investigation.

 

[mark francis]

i'm not "disputing" anything, i'm asking you to prove it.

and the fact that state officials didn't "dispute" something doesn't mean its true *****. Usually it means there is no value to disputing something because there is no proof it is valid to start with.

state officials have better things to do than pandering to you morons

You are asking me to prove a number that nobody disputes, not even you. I will not do something so silly as that.

 

[pjmret]

Republicans have failed to prove the questionable ballots were illegally cast with evil intent, but Democrats have no business accepting questionable ballots as legitimate without an investigation.

there is no credible evidence they are "questionable" *****. lol

 

[pjmret]

You are asking me to prove a number that nobody disputes, not even you. I will not do something so silly as that.

"no one disputes" is not "everyone agrees on" *****.
it was not disputed because there is no credible reason to investigate it. duh.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

even trump appointed judges rejected your stupidity. are they also "leftist" *****? lol

Of course, even Trump appointees denied the evidence of fraud and claimed without proof that massive fraud did not occur.

 

[pjmret]

Of course, even Trump appointees denied the evidence of fraud and claimed without proof that massive fraud did not occur.

when your evidence is so weak that even trump appointees reject it, and you keep insisting its credible, the problem is..you. lol