I have the answer to the student loan problem

[pjmret]

Democrats accuse American patriots of treason for daring to question Democrat assurances that no fraud occurred while also blocking any investigations designed to verify whether fraud occurred or not.

Milwaukee County clerk rejects election investigation subpoena (wisn.com)
Milwaukee County clerk won't comply with election investigation subpoena

State Rep. Janel Brandtjen issued subpoenas to election clerks in Milwaukee and Brown counties on Aug. 6

Updated: 6:44 PM CDT Sep 3, 2021

But Milwaukee County Attorney Margaret Daun said in a letter to Brandtjen on Friday that the subpoena was not valid because it was not signed by Assembly Speaker Robin Vos or the Assembly's chief clerk, as required by law. She said the county would comply with any legally issued subpoena and noted it will have participated in seven reviews of the election.


hahahahahhahaha

even wisconsin republicans knew that subpoena was BS and refused to sign it. another illegal attempt by maga morons was rightfully rejected.

Robin Joseph Vos (born July 5, 1968) is an American businessman and Republican politician and the 79th speaker of the Wisconsin State Assembly, serving in that role since 2013. He has been a member of the Assembly since 2005,[1] representing most of the southern half of Racine County.[2] Vos is also president of the National Conference of State Legislatures.[3]


is he a "leftist and commie" too? hahahahha

 

[mark francis]

when your evidence is so weak that even trump appointees reject it, and you keep insisting its credible, the problem is..you. lol

Rejecting evidence of voting fraud is the acceptable thing to do among the ignorant members of the worldly mob. Peer pressure caused members in good standing among the majority mob to believe Trump colluded with Russia and Democrats committed no widespread fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Rejecting evidence of voting fraud is the acceptable thing to do among the ignorant members of the worldly mob. Peer pressure caused members in good standing among the majority mob to believe Trump colluded with Russia and Democrats committed no widespread fraud.

"worldly mob" including republican judges? lol.
you're a *****.

maybe god will come down and prove this fraud. its your only hope!

 

[mark francis]

"could have". you morons live in the world of fantasy and dreams.

maybe trump lost by even more than he did!

Will Democrats fight for ways to make elections less secure and fraud easier to commit? Obviously.

Nevada 'fraud': 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as 'homes' | Washington Examiner

Saturday, November 26, 2022

Nevada 'fraud': 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as 'homes'

 

[mark francis]

nah, the way it works is that you morons who claim fraud and stolen elections have to prove it.

and you failed. every time. lol

ps - the judges said it wasn't credible. there. duh.

Rejecting evidence of fraud is easy because Democrats know how hard it is for Republicans to prove how many of the hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots were cast with evil intent.

 

[mark francis]

see, and pay attention *****, the legal system, and the world, works on proving claims of bad behavior. its up to the person claiming bad behavior to prove it, and you failed.

"innocent until proven beyond a reasonable doubt" and you morons failed to prove fraud beyond a reasonable doubt

The evidence of voting fraud abounds yet Democrats fool stupid people into believing no fraud occurred because they point to the fact that Republicans do not prove every one of the hundreds of thousands of shady ballots for Biden was illegitimate. Furthermore, Democrats fool fools into believing no fraud occurred by simply claiming, but not proving, there is no evidence of fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Rejecting evidence of fraud is easy because Democrats know how hard it is for Republicans to prove how many of the hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots were cast with evil intent.

Yes it is hard to prove something that never happened lol

 

[pjmret]

The evidence of voting fraud abounds yet Democrats fool stupid people into believing no fraud occurred because they point to the fact that Republicans do not prove every one of the hundreds of thousands of shady ballots for Biden was illegitimate.

Republican states rejected your evidence because it was stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

except they did examine it, *****.. and declared it not credible. duh

you continue to lie. lol

No, the evidence was not examined in court. Democrats did not want evidence of fraud to be presented in court in front of a jury. Instead, Democrats and their faithful media propagandists convinced the worldly mob that examining claims of voter fraud is evil.

 

[pjmret]

Will Democrats fight for ways to make elections less secure and fraud easier to commit? Obviously.

Nevada 'fraud': 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as 'homes' | Washington Examiner

Saturday, November 26, 2022

Nevada 'fraud': 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as 'homes'

Claim: 42,000 Nevadans voted more than once​

The claim that 42,000 people voted more than once in Nevada is false. The allegation originates from testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee presented by Trump campaign attorney Jesse Binnall.

Derek T. Muller, a professor at the University of Iowa College of Law, analyzed the origins of Binnall's 42,000 figure and found that the claim stemmed from a report by the Republican National Committee's chief data officer, Jesse Kamzol. The report lacked overall methodology and underlying data.

Carson City District Judge James Russell ruled against the Trump campaign's request to block the certification of Nevada's presidential election results in early December.

The court concluded that the Kamzol's data was not credible, and Russell wrote that his methodology "had little to no information about or supervision over the origins of his data, the manner in which it had been matched, and what the rate of false positives would be. Additionally, there was little or no verification of his numbers."

In the 35-page order, Russell also wrote that "the record does not support a finding that any Nevada voter voted twice."


You morons are morons lol

 

[pjmret]

No, the evidence was not examined in court. Democrats did not want evidence of fraud to be presented in court in front of a jury. Instead, Democrats and their faithful media propagandists convinced the worldly mob that examining claims of voter fraud is evil.

Yes it was lol

I just posted another example ***** duh

 

[mark francis]

well, "everyone" apparently didn't include every judge, every state, and even trump's own dhs and doj. lol

no one has to "refute" the evidence, *****. you have to prove it. duh.

god your'e stupid. lol

You mention a lot of people none of whom offered persuasive refutations of voter fraud evidence. For example,

well, "everyone" apparently didn't include every judge, every state, and even trump's own dhs and doj. lol

no one has to "refute" the evidence, *****. you have to prove it. duh.

god your'e stupid. lol

I disagree. I don't think any judge in any state ruled that mismatching signatures on absentee ballots were acceptable.

Bombshells undercut the 'Big Lie:' 21 confirmed illegalities, irregularities from 2020 election | Just The News

Bad voter signatures? A review of Maricopa County's mail-in ballots in Arizona's 2020 presidential election estimated that more than 200,000 ballots with signatures that did not match voter files were counted without being reviewed, more than eight times the number the county acknowledged.

 

[mark francis]

so trump judges are lefties and commies now? lol

They are if they promote lies in support of anti-American communism and socialism.

 

[mark francis]

no, you are wrong. if you were right you would have convinced independent people like courts.

but you failed. duh

There are many examples of fraud no court ever addressed, like this evidence:

150,000 Votes in the 2020 Election Not Tied to a Valid Address in Wisconsin: Election Watchdog (theepochtimes.com)

Wisconsin's top election official, Meagan Wolfe, speaks during a virtual press conference on Nov. 4, 2020. (Wisconsin State Handout via Reuters)

150,000 Votes in the 2020 Election Not Tied to a Valid Address in Wisconsin: Election Watchdog
By Steven Kovac
January 4, 2023 Updated: January 4, 2023

Election Watch (EW), a Wisconsin election integrity watchdog organization, has discovered that more than 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election cannot be connected with a valid address.

 

[mark francis]

it wasn't just democrats saying the election was valid *****.
it was trump's own dhs and doj, every red state, and republican judges. duh. lol

Claiming the election was valid in spite of hundreds of examples of voting fraud that remained unresolved is jumping the gun.