Stupid cartoon
What he was charged with was clearly laid out
You are even more of a ***** than usual
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
Is this true
- Thread starter the annoying thing
- Start date
What he was charged with was clearly laid out
You are even more of a ***** than usual
Werbung:
Nah he was known to have documents
The raid was to get them back *****
God you are stupid lol
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
Trump is not the first American to be framed by thugs and falsely charged with a crime he is not guilty of.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
Too bad for Biden's weaponized storm troopers that Garland failed to itemize the documents they were supposedly after and which he was required by law to itemize.
All you morons need to do is prove he was framed duh
Required by law? Surely scotus would intervene if that were true. Or... it isn't true lol
Chaidragonfire
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2023
- Messages
- 44
Here's How Much Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Is Worth
But unlike his predecessor, Zelensky never was a billionaire. He’s currently worth roughly $20 million at most, based on reporting by Forbes Ukraine.
www.forbesmiddleeast.com
Forbes claims he's worth at least $20 MILLION........which is $20 million TOO MUCH!
And that doesn't include his millions in investments, hidden caches of cash, real estate holdings, or his percentage for white washing and laundering OUR tax dollars the Pedocrats funnel over to him.
Here's How Much Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Is Worth
But unlike his predecessor, Zelensky never was a billionaire. He’s currently worth roughly $20 million at most, based on reporting by Forbes Ukraine.
Forbes claims he's worth at least $20 MILLION........which is $20 million TOO MUCH!
And that doesn't include his millions in investments, hidden caches of cash, real estate holdings, or his percentage for white washing and laundering OUR tax dollars the Pedocrats funnel over to him.
View attachment 5621
'nidden chaches of cash". lol.
you morons will never stop whining and making up "facts"
genocidal? that's..putin *****.
war mongering? that's..putin, *****.
democratic puppet? republicans support him too, *****.
my god you make regular morons look smart
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
Biden's politicized justice department claimed, but did not prove, Trump was guilty of sedition in order to conduct a search and seizure of everything he owned in their zeal to find something they could use to falsely accuse and jail him. Contrast that with Biden's illegal theft of classified documents years ago which he stored in unsecure locations frequented by Chinese spies.
Our country is under the tyrannical rule of the corrupt Democrat party and those crooks need to be arrested and jailed, not exalted into future positions of authority.
Last edited:
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 16,292
No. What was in the classified documents was already known. They were not trying to find something to incriminate him. He did that to himself because he had stile documents. That's the crime which has been persued.
You have to ask what was the reason he kept them when an ex POTUS is completely irrelevant to govt workings. He kept them to use against America to further his traitorous agenda. In other words blackmail USA by threatening democrats with sensitive information that would expose it.
But that's ok with dumb arse traitors like you.
If it were proven he sold out to communists, would you still support him as a patriotic America as you have described him before? If course you would because you're a brain dead delusional godbothering republican.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
If he stole documents then so did another former President, Bill Clinton. Worse, however, is the fact that at least two non-former presidents illegally stole documents, some of which wetre destroyed and some of which were placed in a traffic area frequented by known Chinese spies. If Jackspit Smith really wanted to secure criminal convictions against politicians with stolen documents, then he should have been looking at the worse cases involving Hillary and Biden.
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 16,292
Was he indicted for stealing classified documents?
I've seen no record of that.
Name them and show the link.
Now you are being hysterical. Let me guess. It was people linked to the democrats. How did I know that.
Cut the silly names. It's extremely immature and shows your contempt of him because he is up Trump. Grow up.
Biden did not steal documents Ashe was in Congress at the time. Furthermore, I haven't seen what the documents were and neither have you.
As for Hilary, I understand they were on a private server which is her business. It is reported she had sensitive material but no one has ever proven it so conspiracy theories based on hate wont cut it with me. It's evidence I want.
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
mark francis said:
If he stole documents then so did another former President, Bill Clinton.
If he stole documents then so did another former President, Bill Clinton.
He was not indicted because when he was dragged into court over his possession of the documents a friendly Democrat judge ruled that as a former President he had the right to keep whatever documents he wanted to keep.
Boris Norris
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2022
- Messages
- 16,292
This proves without doubt it was not Clinton but one of his aids. Would you like to apologise now it later. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/01/politics/exclinton-aide-to-admit-taking-classified-papers.html
WHY do you post lies day after day without checking? You're a dickhead son and a brain dead godbotherer also which probably explains your impaired thinking.
Werbung:
mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,269
Sherlock should look more closely into this before issuing a wrong conclusion. Berger took documents in 2003 and that had nothing to do with the documents Clinton took when he left the WH years earlier. Here are some key points to keep in mind:
The Brief: It Was Okay for Bill Clinton to Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?
A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
thegreggjarrett.com
The Brief: It Was Okay For Bill Clinton To Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?
A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.
Fast forward to August 8, 2022 when Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered a team of FBI agents to raid and forcibly seize presidential records from the home and office of former President Donald Trump. Garland did it because it was Trump, not Clinton. It was purely political and contrary to the established policy of the DOJ, the controlling law under the Presidential Records Act, and the earlier federal court decision.
So, there you have it. Garland defied both the DOJ’s own legal interpretation of the law and previous court precedent to target Trump in advance of an important national election. His flagrant abuse of power bears the unmistakable stench of partisan politics, which has infected the attorney general’s corrupt tenure from the outset.
The FBI did not raid Clinton’s home to reclaim records. Nor did the FBI raid former president Barack Obama’s unsecured warehouse where he stored classified documents for the better part of two years. Lawless raids only happen to Republicans.
Thus, in the Trump dispute, the proper remedy was for Garland to file a motion to compel enforcement of the civil subpoena seeking records. Instead, he chose to ignore the Presidential Records Act and raid Trump’s home under the guise of criminal statutes that have no application. He snookered a magistrate into signing an overly broad general search warrant that is strictly prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.
FBI Director Christopher Wray has done nothing to cleanup his cesspool of an agency. To the contrary, he covers up acts of malfeasance and misfeasance while enabling Garland’s authoritarian lawlessness. Concerned parents who complain at school board meetings are treated as “domestic terrorists” and investigated by the FBI. Escalating attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers are largely ignored with zero arrests. Both the FBI and DOJ look the other way when demonstrators shout threats at conservative Supreme Court Justices outside their homes, in direct violation of the law.
None of this is surprising given the shameful record of the FBI. Under Wray’s predecessor James Comey, the agency lied to the FISA court to obtain warrants to spy on Trump’s campaign, doctored evidence against him, and used a phony “dossier” as the basis for a corrupted “collusion” investigation of the president that they knew was utterly baseless. Sadly, this is what our once vaunted law enforcement agency has become —a powerful political cabal that targets innocent Americans and routinely violates their civil rights.
Both Wray and Garland have squandered trust in government. They should be sacked or impeached. Reform is desperately needed.
