Is this true

[Boris Norris]

Sherlock should look more closely into this before issuing a wrong conclusion. Berger took documents in 2003 and that had nothing to do with the documents Clinton took when he left the WH years earlier. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

The Brief: It Was Okay for Bill Clinton to Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?

A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.

thegreggjarrett.com

On that basis, ex-president Bill Clinton was allowed to maintain custody of whatever he wanted, including allegedly classified audio tapes that he stored in his home.
Notice it said "allegedly".
It as word that always pops up with items you propose as to be fact. Thank you Sherlock.

Just a little bit to remind you what politics your source is. Jarrett is known for his pro-Trump commentary, and for his criticism of the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections. In 2018, he published The Russia Hoax, which argues that the "deep state" have sought to undermine the Trump administration and protect 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.[1] He has described Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe as "illegitimate and corrupt" and likened the FBI to the KGB.

Of course he would fabricate lies like you.

The Brief: It Was Okay For Bill Clinton To Keep Presidential Records, But Not Trump?
A former president can keep whatever presidential records he wants and the government has no authority to seize them. Period.

Fast forward to August 8, 2022 when Attorney General Merrick Garland ordered a team of FBI agents to raid and forcibly seize presidential records from the home and office of former President Donald Trump. Garland did it because it was Trump, not Clinton. It was purely political and contrary to the established policy of the DOJ, the controlling law under the Presidential Records Act, and the earlier federal court decision.

So, there you have it. Garland defied both the DOJ’s own legal interpretation of the law and previous court precedent to target Trump in advance of an important national election. His flagrant abuse of power bears the unmistakable stench of partisan politics, which has infected the attorney general’s corrupt tenure from the outset.

he was within his legal rights in which your article clearly fails to state what he did was illegal.

the difference between Trump and the others is trump was a known idiot with clear intentions to pass on any secrets to communist spies. That's without doubt. Secondly there was nothing alleged about his right to gave them. He didn't have the right and it was proven to be so so.
but the take home for idiots like you is trump is a treasonous ratbag, totally unpredictable and hates USA because he can't control it..

I hope you read the article I posted from MSNBC about his hope to install himself as a dictator. That is why he is been bashed around by USA law. He's a dickhead.

The FBI did not raid Clinton’s home to reclaim records. Nor did the FBI raid former president Barack Obama’s unsecured warehouse where he stored classified documents for the better part of two years. Lawless raids only happen to Republicans.

No. Obama's documents were unclassified or he wouldn't be allowed to have them. Apart from the fact there was no searches to find out if he had any so how did they know if he had them if nothing was ever found it searched.
you're an idiot Sherlock. Have another hail Mary and pray.

Thus, in the Trump dispute, the proper remedy was for Garland to file a motion to compel enforcement of the civil subpoena seeking records.

That would work on Trump wouldn't it. But when it didn't they would have to raid the place like they did. Where's the problem with it?

Instead, he chose to ignore the Presidential Records Act and raid Trump’s home under the guise of criminal statutes that have no application. He snookered a magistrate into signing an overly broad general search warrant that is strictly prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.

No one snookered anyone. One of the not corrupted judges obeyed his obligations under the law.
I'll bet you've never read the fourth amendment.

FBI Director Christopher Wray has done nothing to cleanup his cesspool of an agency. To the contrary, he covers up acts of malfeasance and misfeasance while enabling Garland’s authoritarian lawlessness. Concerned parents who complain at school board meetings are treated as “domestic terrorists” and investigated by the FBI. Escalating attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers are largely ignored with zero arrests. Both the FBI and DOJ look the other way when demonstrators shout threats at conservative Supreme Court Justices outside their homes, in direct violation of the law.

None of this is surprising given the shameful record of the FBI. Under Wray’s predecessor James Comey, the agency lied to the FISA court to obtain warrants to spy on Trump’s campaign, doctored evidence against him, and used a phony “dossier” as the basis for a corrupted “collusion” investigation of the president that they knew was utterly baseless. Sadly, this is what our once vaunted law enforcement agency has become —a powerful political cabal that targets innocent Americans and routinely violates their civil rights.

Both Wray and Garland have squandered trust in government. They should be sacked or impeached. Reform is desperately needed.

Your source us as nutty and hate filled as you.
All he has said is his opinion and hate. No one disobeyed the law or amendments. It's just that it was doing its job which involved a bloody idiot like Trump at the centre of it.
The amendments etc are there for exactly that reason, the same as all you gun nuts justify your guns for get rid of tyranny if necessary. The difference is garland had balls and the shooter dickheads have got no brains.
Which begs the question, with all the illegal acts by garland and Smith etc why haven't the extreme right taken up arms and done something? It's because even those idiots know an idiot when they see one like Trump.

 

[mark francis]

On that basis, ex-president Bill Clinton was allowed to maintain custody of whatever he wanted, including allegedly classified audio tapes that he stored in his home.
Notice it said "allegedly".
It as word that always pops up with items you propose as to be fact. Thank you Sherlock.

Just a little bit to remind you what politics your source is. Jarrett is known for his pro-Trump commentary, and for his criticism of the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections. In 2018, he published The Russia Hoax, which argues that the "deep state" have sought to undermine the Trump administration and protect 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.[1] He has described Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe as "illegitimate and corrupt" and likened the FBI to the KGB.

Of course he would fabricate lies like you.

Gregg Jarrett was absolutely right to expose the partisan thugs who illegally lied and spied on Trump for 4 years while trying to seditiously overthrow his legitimately elected government.

he was within his legal rights in which your article clearly fails to state what he did was illegal.

the difference between Trump and the others is trump was a known idiot with clear intentions to pass on any secrets to communist spies.

So that's it. Garland's Watergate-style raid of Trump's headquarters was sparked in part because Garland somehow knew in advance that if Trump kept all documents he had declassified he would give them over to terrorists? That Garland must be really good if he knows when to charge and arrest a crook he knows is going to commit a crime before he has committed the crime.

 

[mark francis]

No. Obama's documents were unclassified or he wouldn't be allowed to have them. Apart from the fact there was no searches to find out if he had any so how did they know if he had them if nothing was ever found it searched.
you're an idiot Sherlock. Have another hail Mary and pray.

If Obama and Bill Clinton were allowed to keep documents they declassified then why do Democrats claim when Trump does it he is committing treason?

 

[mark francis]

Which begs the question, with all the illegal acts by garland and Smith etc why haven't the extreme right taken up arms and done something? It's because even those idiots know an idiot when they see one like Trump.

lefties have been fomenting armed revolution since the Vietnam war, but they never succeeded in their goal of overthrowing the government. However, patriotic Americans are not like that. Armed revolution is a last resort for Christians but Christians fought to overthrow a tyrannical English government in 1776 and if necessary, Christians may become inspired to take up arms against the ungodly crooks who are destroying America from within while wielding illegal and unconstitutional brutal fascist illegitimate stolen control.

 

[pjmret]

If he stole documents then so did another former President, Bill Clinton. Worse, however, is the fact that at least two non-former presidents illegally stole documents, some of which wetre destroyed and some of which were placed in a traffic area frequented by known Chinese spies. If Jackspit Smith really wanted to secure criminal convictions against politicians with stolen documents, then he should have been looking at the worse cases involving Hillary and Biden.

Nope Clinton did not but Trump did by refusing to return them
Which is why

If Obama and Bill Clinton were allowed to keep documents they declassified then why do Democrats claim when Trump does it he is committing treason?

He didn't declassified them *****

 

[pjmret]

lefties have been fomenting armed revolution since the Vietnam war, but they never succeeded in their goal of overthrowing the government. However, patriotic Americans are not like that. Armed revolution is a last resort for Christians but Christians fought to overthrow a tyrannical English government in 1776 and if necessary, Christians may become inspired to take up arms against the ungodly crooks who are destroying America from within while wielding illegal and unconstitutional brutal fascist illegitimate stolen control.

Whether it is a last resort is irrelevant to the crimes by right wing morons on Jan 6

 

[Boris Norris]

Gregg Jarrett was absolutely right to expose the partisan thugs who illegally lied and spied on Trump for 4 years while trying to seditiously overthrow his legitimately elected government.

If course he's allowed to say what he wants but his right wing links to fox completely excludes his opinion as worth a pitch of salt. Fox themselves were fined for spreading lies but you've attached your faith to another lying Christian godbotherer as if he would tell the truth.

So that's it. Garland's Watergate-style raid of Trump's headquarters was sparked in part because Garland somehow knew in advance that if Trump kept all documents he had declassified he would give them over to terrorists?

In my opinion yes and I'll bet that thought went through the DOJ also. Trump is irratic, unstable and a nut who worshipped dictators and with doubt wanted and still does want to be the dictator who ruled USA.
That's is every reason combined to lock the dickhead up.

That Garland must be really good if he knows when to charge and arrest a crook he knows is going to commit a crime before he has committed the crime.

Not just garland. Trump stole classified documents when as an ex POTUS he had no use for them. If they were unclassified, I don't have a problem.
In the case of Trump we know what his intentions were with his bullshit about stolen elections and his attempt to install a dictatorship so why would be garland be wrong for seizing every paper including his toilet paper to stop the undermining the security of America.
Watch the article I posted. I know you won't because you regard them as lefties and heaven forbid a lying Christian hypocrite like you would never get to heaven exposing yourselves to facts.

Take it further, if Trump is not imprisoned or at least legally gagged, there's no logical reason to believe he will not continue to belch lies about how he was treated until he dies.
Because in USA there are billions if low IQ people like yourself that when annointed into cults like Trump and religion, you will not stop the bullshit without force. You will never stop justifying Trump's bullshit.
You don't have the mental capacity to see his stupidity
Because you still believe there's a god. That says it all.

 

[pjmret]

If Obama and Bill Clinton were allowed to keep documents they declassified then why do Democrats claim when Trump does it he is committing treason?

If you read they 8ndictment it didn't matter if he declassified them ***** duh

 

[mark francis]

Nope Clinton did not but Trump did by refusing to return them

Are you saying Clinton was sued in court for returning documents or after he returned documents? If so then why did leftist Judge Jackson tell him he could keep whatever he wanted to keep because he was ex-president?

 

[mark francis]

Whether it is a last resort is irrelevant to the crimes by right wing morons on Jan 6

Christians did not fight on Jan 6 but they may fight if Democrats do not stop destroying America with evil and perversion.

 

[pjmret]

Christians did not fight on Jan 6 but they may fight if Democrats do not stop destroying America with evil and perversion.

Destroying America
Lol

 

[mark francis]

If course he's allowed to say what he wants but his right wing links to fox completely excludes his opinion as worth a pitch of salt.

Unadulterated dumbdog leftist biased crap.

 

[pjmret]

Christians did not fight on Jan 6 but they may fight if Democrats do not stop destroying America with evil and perversion.

So not a single person rioting on Jan 6 was a Christian?
Prove it *****

 

[pjmret]

Are you saying Clinton was sued in court for returning documents or after he returned documents? If so then why did leftist Judge Jackson tell him he could keep whatever he wanted to keep because he was ex-president?

Trump is charged under the espionage act *****. Clinton has nothing to do with that
God you are stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

In my opinion yes and I'll bet that thought went through the DOJ also. Trump is irratic, unstable and a nut who worshipped dictators and with doubt wanted and still does want to be the dictator who ruled USA.
That's is every reason combined to lock the dickhead up.

Democrats want to lock up Trump, not because he has committed a traditional crime worthy of imprisonment, but because they know how wicked, hateful, perverse, corrupt, deranged, irrational, insane, untrustworthy, incompetent, and unpopular he is. In other words, in the new leftist socialist Democrat banana republic it is a serious crime punishable by imprisonment to be hated by socialist Democrats.

Ironically, under older KKK Democrat mob rule in the US South, any back who offended a Democrat was subject to lynching without due process, the way Trump was lynchpeached in the Democrat House - twice.