J-6 DC shooter demands more than the tens of thousands of dollars he was paid to keep quiet or he will expose the crime he was involved in

[PamiUSA]

It was your choice to insult before saying the above. But fine. Go ahead and ask for documetation for something I claimed.

Did I insult you?

 

[Randomguy]

Did I insult you?

I guess for an asshole ass is a compliment.

 

[PamiUSA]

I guess for an asshole ass is a compliment.

I just stated sometimes “less is best”.

I guess for an asshole ass is a compliment.

I don’t think I called you an ass? Are we paranoid? Sensitive?

“Less is best at times! Too much makes one look like an ass! Might want to think on that.”

 

[Randomguy]

I just stated sometimes “less is best”.

I don’t think I called you an ass? Are we paranoid? Sensitive?

“Less is best at times! Too much makes one look like an ass! Might want to think on that.”

I cannot find your quote. Perhaps you edited.

I bet you did not notice that my post could be considered self depricating.

I am somewhat paranoid. I am not sensitive.

 

[PamiUSA]

I cannot find your quote. Perhaps you edited.

I bet you did not notice that my post could be considered self depticating.

I am somewhat paranoid. I am not sensitive.

I did not edit it and I put it right above in previous reply. If I edited it it would state it.
Here it is again!!!!!!

“Less is best at times! Too much makes one look like an ass! Might want to think on that.”

 

[PamiUSA]

I cannot find your quote. Perhaps you edited.

I bet you did not notice that my post could be considered self depricating.

I am somewhat paranoid. I am not sensitive.

 

[Randomguy]

I don’t know how I missed that. Sorry.

Hmm. So I say I meant the comment was about Charlottesville was not good enough for you but I should accept “might want to think on that” was not a dig at me.

I am not a fan of your cryptic vague responses.

 

[PamiUSA]

I don’t know how I missed that. Sorry.

Hmm. So I say I meant the comment was about Charlottesville was not good enough for you but I should accept “might want to think on that” was not a dig at me.

I am not a fan of your cryptic vague responses.

Hmmm the amount of rallies that were held made me curious as to which one you were speaking of and as you are stating or wondering if that comment is about you? Interesting!

 

[Randomguy]

Hmmm the amount of rallies that were held made me curious as to which one you were speaking of and as you are stating or wondering if that comment is about you? Interesting!

I can understand avoiding confrontation but I am not a fan of evading engagement. Else why be on a discussion forum?

Also why not believe me? I asked you two pointed questions, both of which you avoided answering:

- have I ever insulted you?
- have I ever lied to you?

 

[Randomguy]

You ask of others to show documentation so only fair to show yours.

Go ahead and ask for documentation for something I claimed.

go ahead, please.

 

[PamiUSA]

go ahead, please.

I did earlier. The 60 cases that Trump went through. But hey it’s ok. I give you a hard time and it’s clear you do not like that at all! You know how it is when you want an answer about something. But it is ok.

 

[Randomguy]

I did earlier. The 60 cases that Trump went through. But hey it’s ok. I give you a hard time and it’s clear you do not like that at all! You know how it is when you want an answer about something. But it is ok.

I have never asked for documentation to either troll others or obfuscate discussion. The 60 (in fact I think either 61 or 60+) is well known, widely known and documented. I consider that request of yours insincere and trolling me. You want a list of 60 with details and say excerpts. That is trolling and insincere imo.

Now go ahead and answer my two questions.

I do not mind being given a hard time. I don’t even mind a smart insult, especuially when combined with smart arguments.

 

[Phoenix68]

And you show the lawsuits that he was sued 60 times. Number them like you enjoy doing.

.
The Cases Against Trump: A Guide
November 25, 2024
.​

"What follows is a summary of the major legal cases against Spanky, assessments of the gravity of the charges, and the prognosis. This guide will be updated as necessary."

.​

 

[Phoenix68]

I have never asked for documentation to either troll others or obfuscate discussion. The 60 ( in fact I think either 61 or 60+) is well known, widely known and documented. I consider that request of yours insincere and trolling me. You want a list of 60 with details and say excerpts. That is trolling and insincere imo.

.

.
Kinda weak, there, pal. I've always (well, since '96, anyhow) considered the dividing-line, between Teabaggers/MAGATS and politically-astute patriots is....politically-astute patriots have NO problem "showing their work"; i.e. if we aren't showing the proof we're referencing, we'd be no different than the Teabaggers/MAGATS....who simply talk "shit", just to be obnoxious....like obedient, lil' MAGATS.
.​

 

[Boris Norris]

Fighting like the devil against election laws requiring states to keep their voting registries uncorrupted with names of ineligible voters is common among democrats but not republicans.

Michigan’s Secretary of State Fights to Keep Dead on Voter Rolls | The Heritage Foundation 8-31-22

So you have no evidence. That's what I thought.