Let's settle a argument between mark and Boris

[the annoying thing]

Mark said my Edna produced several times the CO2 then all of man kind.
Well it has a huge CO2 emissions 10 percent of all CO2 produced is produced by it daily.. It's been around for almost 3 million years. I think it's very possibly that mark is correct . My Edna puts out a record amount of CO2 daily compared to other volcanos.
All I can say is do the math.

Mount Edna produced 9000 tons a day multiply that my 2 million .
And you know how much it has produced..
Man kind has emitted about 2.5 trillion tons sense 1850.

 

[the annoying thing]

Now to make it easy multiply the 9000 tons it emits in a day x 365 that's 3.285.000 tons a year .
For 100 years that 328,500,000 tons ever 100 years .
Now multiply that by 25000 and you get 8,212,500,000,000 . So it along has put out several times more then we have

 

[the annoying thing]

The point mark was making if I am right is mother nature can not be controlled and liberals are idiots for thinking they can.
They have no clue how much mother nature affects the climate and it is always in a state of change. Also they seem to think they can change things in the short term solar power for the entire earth is a long way off. And if they really want to have a effect we need to reduce our population .

 

[pjmret]

Nah it's just the usual bs from mark

Fact check: Humans responsible for more CO2 emissions than volcanoes, including Mt. Etna

Humans are responsible for more CO2 emissions than volcanoes. A single Mt. Etna eruption did not produce 10,000 times more CO2 than humans.

www.usatoday.com

 

[the annoying thing]

Nah it's just the usual bs from mark

Fact check: Humans responsible for more CO2 emissions than volcanoes, including Mt. Etna

Humans are responsible for more CO2 emissions than volcanoes. A single Mt. Etna eruption did not produce 10,000 times more CO2 than humans.

www.usatoday.com

Clearly you can not read it has produced several times what we have .

 

[pjmret]

Clearly you can not read it has produced several times what we have .

The article doesn't say that
quote where it does

 

[the annoying thing]

Nah mark just copies stupidity and mindlessly posts it

No one claims we can control nature *****
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't control our own activities if they are harmful
God you are stupid

Why do you mention God you do not think there is one and yes democrats like AOC were saying we had what 12 years to change our way before it was to late.
Now just what was your idiot leader thinking .

 

[the annoying thing]

Quote where it says what you claim it says ***** lolUnlike you lug nut.

first off I saw that same article si I researched thee issue .
here is what I found you lug nut .

1. • 
     
   • 9000 tons/day
     • Etna is perhaps the most striking example, contributing to 10 per cent (9000 tons/day) of the present global volcanic CO 2 emission. That is three times more CO 2 than a volcano like Kilauea (Hawaii) emits, which erupts four times more magma
     ,
     It is 2,5 million years old so you do the math pin head .I know you ran out of fingers and toes to count with, but it is several times the amount of what we have put out sense 1850. Its called basic math . Try it .
     

 

[pjmret]

first off I saw that same article si I researched thee issue .
here is what I found you lug nut .

1. • 
     
   • 9000 tons/day
     • Etna is perhaps the most striking example, contributing to 10 per cent (9000 tons/day) of the present global volcanic CO 2 emission. That is three times more CO 2 than a volcano like Kilauea (Hawaii) emits, which erupts four times more magma
     ,
     It is 2,5 million years old so you do the math pin head .I know you ran out of fingers and toes to count with, but it is several times the amount of what we have put out sense 1850. Its called basic math . Try it .

You ASSume it's been doing that for millions of years but you have no idea *****

And if you think mark was comparing millions of years of volcanoes to hundreds of years of humans you are even dumber than a *****
clearly he was trying to state (and failing) that human emissions year by year are dwarfed by volcanoes, and that is truly a lie. duh

 

[Starcastle]

Nah mark just copies stupidity and mindlessly posts it

No one claims we can control nature *****
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't control our own activities if they are harmful
God you are stupid

They are not harmful. C02 is not a pollutant.

CC is a white western obsession and just a way to control our economy.

 

[pjmret]

They are not harmful. C02 is not a pollutant.

CC is a white western obsession and just a way to control our economy.

Define pollutant

Co2 is a greenhouse gas, a gas that works to trap heat in the atmosphere
Humans and other life are adapted to live in a temperature range
Our global economy is tuned to a certain pattern of temperatures, rainfall,etc. In other words for example crops are grown efficiently in areas conducive to growing in terms of those factors, such as our Midwest. Housing is built on dry land, roads go where rivers don't flow,
If those factors change enough, the economy will be disrupted negatively and that will hurt our standard of living. Less rainfall in crop areas means less food, For poor countries that means people will die for example. This kind of change is a bad thing

So co2 isn't bad until we have too much then too much is a bad thing. Then it most definitely is harmful

Feel free to disagree with the above if you specifically can