Limited Government lost

Dr.Who

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
6,776
Location
Horse Country
Individual rights have been bastardized. There is no such thing as "a right to a job," "a right to health care," "a right to a decent home," et cetera. No one can transform the actions of those that create products and/or services into another's purview.
Today, violations of individual rights are so pervasive that many Americans are ignorant of what individual rights actually are and of the extent to which their rights are daily violated.
Individual rights are not rights to the skills, knowledge, and/or products that others create. Individual rights are rights to actions.
The right to life is the freedom to take those actions to sustain one's life. The right to property is the right to keep what one earns. The right to liberty is the freedom to move about freely, uncoerced, to visit and/or live and seek work where one chooses. The right to the pursuit of happiness is the freedom to take those actions that one believes will result in one's enjoyment of life.
Inherent in the principle of individual rights is the proviso that no one may violate the rights of others. There can be no "right" to violate rights.
Yet there is a rapacious violator among us and it is not criminals or confused youngsters. It is government -- i.e., elected and appointed officials.
Do you want to start a business? Politicians violate your rights by demanding that you buy a permit to operate it, practice a given skill, sell certain products, handle various chemicals, operate a machine or a vehicle, construct a building, et cetera.
Do you want to expand your business or find a job? Union leaders and politicians collude to violate your rights through minimum wage laws.
Do you want to move to a state that has a better market for your business? Or maybe you want to merge with another business in order to create a more efficient and profitable operation? Politicians violate your right to life, property, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by demanding you ask their permission.
Politicians' violation of individual rights and regulations is symbiotic. That relationship directly affects the growth of government.
Signed into law in 1890, the Sherman Antitrust Act was an unprecedented violation of individual rights. Alleged to be a safeguard against "unfair competition," it opened the door to hundreds of violations of individual rights across the board.
During the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt massive interference in the economy began in earnest. In addition to hundreds of executive orders, Roosevelt and his politicians enacted a quantity of regulations that took virtual control of many areas of business. The most destructive and long-lasting were: ending the gold standard; regulating the banking industry; regulating the stock markets; paying farmers to reduce production; forcing wage earners to pay into a "retirement" fund over which they had no control and no choice of investment; forcing employers to allow unionization of their employees and giving organized labor leaders the right to bargain collectively; mandating minimum wage laws.
Amity Shlaes, senior fellow, the Council on Foreign Relations, writes, "Not only through the New Deal, but also through the 1950s and onward the number of workers in the public sector grew. By 1962 they represented an eighth of the national work force." The government had become a behemoth.
The Federal Register, which publishes all regulations indicates by its number of pages the mammoth surge in regulations. From 1975 to 2011, the number of pages increased from 71,224 in 1975 to 169,301.
As the number of regulations grew, recognition and protection of individual rights shrank completely reversing the intention and meaning of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Government was becoming unlimited; individual rights had become limited.
Between 2008 and 2010 the federal government grew by 143,000 employees. By 2009, the number of federal employees alone was more than 2.10 million. Add the 546,000 Postal Service career employees and the number swells to 2,645,000 federal employees.
In 2011, Obama placed on the regulatory agenda 2,676 new regulations. New agencies were formed. More government workers were hired.
Every time a regulation is enacted, it violates the individual rights of every American. The Affordable Health Care Act best exemplifies this fact. It violates the rights of medical personnel, patients, health insurers, insurance clients, medical suppliers, wage earners of every other kind and every home owner. But that's not the end of it. Taking part in that gang rape of our individual rights, the Supreme Court in effect upheld politicians' right to violate rights. Justice Roberts' opinion argued that it was okay to violate our right to life, i.e., to choose what products to buy, because Congress has the authority to violate our property rights, i.e., to levy taxes.
That Supreme Court decision made way for what some have correctly called "a regulatory tsunami." The Affordable Health Care Law alone has already established -- although the work is not even close to completion -- 180 new boards, commissions and bureaus, and created over 13,000 pages of new regulations.
The Dodd-Frank Act -- an act that further regulates an already over-regulated industry -- presently has more than 200 proposals and rules and is not yet completed.
Elected and appointed officials have passed regulations in almost every profession. The regulations distort business projections, interfere with our choices and plans, inculcate uncertainty and undermine risk-taking. They adversely affect income, job opportunities, and general prosperity as businesspeople seeking to protect their enterprises close their plants and/or farm out work to other nations. Further troubling is that the plethora of regulations is causing our most productive and innovative to opt out of the workforce entirely, diminishing economic growth and future prosperity radically.
And still elected and appointed officials write more regulations.
The one protection Americans have against omnipotent government is recognition and protection of individual rights. It is the only mechanism that effectively limits government in size and scope.
To limit government, violation of individual rights must be forbidden. All elected and appointed officials must be prohibited upon penalty of fines and/or imprisonment from violating individual rights in any way for any reason.
This is the only way to stop the bleeding of our freedoms. It is the only way to limit government. We must demand an end to the violation of individual rights.

 
Werbung:
Every once in a while I like to post an article that stands above the rest or sometimes that merely contains parts that are worth analyzing.
 
Every once in a while I like to post an article that stands above the rest or sometimes that merely contains parts that are worth analyzing.

excellent find Doc.

the founders so appreciated the sense of freedom that they never had in Europe they defied all to make a place where it was enshrined.

but the weak filled the void of their departures and so was freedom lost little by little.

Tyler was right about the limited nature of democracy. we beat the odds a little on the 200 years.
 
That was a very depressing article. Some of us have seen this information before. It is America today. It is reality....a very unfortunate and unjust reality.

America is not America any more thanks to the statists. I fear there is no way to limit government now. It is too big and too powerful. The tipping point has been reached.

I don't like being a pessimist, but America's best days are in the past and we are headed for a very dark place. I hope I am being emotional, but I fear I am not.
 
I don't like being a pessimist, but America's best days are in the past and we are headed for a very dark place. I hope I am being emotional, but I fear I am not.

I've been feeling that way for a long time. When Obama was re-eleccted I knew the Republic was dead. Statism is what lies ahead and nobody's gonna like it, not even the people that voted for him.
 
Limited Government lost


You just noticed this?

It's been going on for a hundred years.

A little at a time, year after year. Until we are where we are today... and still going.
 
Limited Government lost


You just noticed this?

It's been going on for a hundred years.

A little at a time, year after year. Until we are where we are today... and still going.

True...it has been going on for a long time. Only now it is different. The nation is not gradually sinking into a socialist hell hole...it is speeding into it.

We have reached the tipping point. Limited government and individual liberty are a thing of the past and likely will not be seen again for a long time. Statism, liberalism, socialism, etc... rule the day.
 
Conservatives claim to want "limited government" and "smaller government", but they are lying through their teeth !
These hypocrites ,many of them at least, want the U.S. government to be free to pry into the bedrooms and private lives
of any and every American . You know, the ones who are always screaming for "freedom" while calling on the government to
"recriminalize sodomy ". Basically, they are saying that you can't have any freedom at all if you happen to be a homosexual .
I hate that stupid term "sodomy" anyway, which is nothing but acomplete misinterpretation of the Biblical myth of Sodom and Gomorrah, two mythical cities of which there is not one shred of historical and archaeological evidence of ever having existed .
And according to the Biblical myth, these two cities were destroyed not because there were homosexuals living ther,e but because the inhabitants were wicked and cruel people .
And if these people want "sodomy" to be recriminalized, do they want th eU.S. government to put up surveillance cameras everywhere , and to arrest anyone caught having homosexual sex, and then to have them criminally prosecuted , imprisoned and possibly executed nbecause of a stupid ancient myth ?
And these hypocritical right-wing slimeballs also want the government to tell women what they may and may not do with their bodies .
They want the government in women's reproductive organs , and many also want contraceptives, the very thing which can PREVENT so many abortions,made illegal ! Blithering idiots ! With "freedom" like this, who needs tyranny ? Sheesh ! I'm not gay myself, but I loathe bigotry toward gay people.
 
Conservatives claim to want "limited government" and "smaller government", but they are lying through their teeth !
These hypocrites ,many of them at least, want the U.S. government to be free to pry into the bedrooms and private lives
of any and every American . You know, the ones who are always screaming for "freedom" while calling on the government to
"recriminalize sodomy ". Basically, they are saying that you can't have any freedom at all if you happen to be a homosexual .
I hate that stupid term "sodomy" anyway, which is nothing but acomplete misinterpretation of the Biblical myth of Sodom and Gomorrah, two mythical cities of which there is not one shred of historical and archaeological evidence of ever having existed .
And according to the Biblical myth, these two cities were destroyed not because there were homosexuals living ther,e but because the inhabitants were wicked and cruel people .
And if these people want "sodomy" to be recriminalized, do they want th eU.S. government to put up surveillance cameras everywhere , and to arrest anyone caught having homosexual sex, and then to have them criminally prosecuted , imprisoned and possibly executed nbecause of a stupid ancient myth ?
And these hypocritical right-wing slimeballs also want the government to tell women what they may and may not do with their bodies .
They want the government in women's reproductive organs , and many also want contraceptives, the very thing which can PREVENT so many abortions,made illegal ! Blithering idiots ! With "freedom" like this, who needs tyranny ? Sheesh ! I'm not gay myself, but I loathe bigotry toward gay people.

In the world of "Google" if you do a search for something, anything, you can get hits. Of course the more hits you get the more people are posting about it or searching for it. Generally speaking any search at all will yield hundreds of thousands of hits. For example, I just googled "three legged cat" and got 1,180,000 hits. That is actually kind of shabby considering that "Katy Perry got 241,000,000 hits . On the other hand when I googled "recriminalize sodomy" I got 1,170 hits, which in the world of Google is virtually zero.

If there are any bona fide conservatives who want to make sodomy illegal they are few and far between. There are probably more liberals who want to make marrying incestuously legal, or for grocery stores to provide plastic bags, or who would want to make wrestling bears illegal. Enough want these laws that these three actually already exist and are on the books.
http://www.dumblaws.com/laws/united-states/

If you in fact, are in favor of individual liberty then it is time that you start protecting the individual liberty of every single person in the country regardless of whether or not you are like-minded. If you want to protect the right of people to engage in sodomy then you are duty bound to protect the private property rights of the rich- or be a hypocrite.
 
No, not all conservatives want to see gay people arrested an d criminally prosecuted, but , but more do than you may realize .
DOMA is nothing but a smokescreen for homophobic bigotry, which is rampant in America. Marriage does not need to be "defended".
Gay marriage does not interfere with anyone elses rights. It does not prevent opposite sex couples from getting married and raising families .
The way conservatives bellyache about gay marriage inevitably leading toward legalizing pedophilia, incest, bestiality etc is absolutely
idiotc . It won't do this at all . Long ago, there were many Americans who were just as opposed to allowing blacks and women to vote
as opponents of gay marriage are today . They screamed like so many chicken littles about how giving voting rights to anyone but white
males was immoral, against God''s will etc and that this would destroy America .
It's still technically legal to fire people in some US states from their jobs merely because they happen to gbe gay . This WRONG .
The idiot former senator Jim De Mint does not want gay people to be allowed to teach in public schools, despite the fact that they
have been doing this from the very beginning of public education, and have often been outstanding educators .
 
No, not all conservatives want to see gay people arrested an d criminally prosecuted, but , but more do than you may realize .
DOMA is nothing but a smokescreen for homophobic bigotry, which is rampant in America. Marriage does not need to be "defended".
Gay marriage does not interfere with anyone elses rights. It does not prevent opposite sex couples from getting married and raising families .
The way conservatives bellyache about gay marriage inevitably leading toward legalizing pedophilia, incest, bestiality etc is absolutely
idiotc . It won't do this at all . Long ago, there were many Americans who were just as opposed to allowing blacks and women to vote
as opponents of gay marriage are today . They screamed like so many chicken littles about how giving voting rights to anyone but white
males was immoral, against God''s will etc and that this would destroy America .
It's still technically legal to fire people in some US states from their jobs merely because they happen to gbe gay . This WRONG .
The idiot former senator Jim De Mint does not want gay people to be allowed to teach in public schools, despite the fact that they
have been doing this from the very beginning of public education, and have often been outstanding educators .

I think the stereotypes in this post are as wrong as the ones in your last post.

Checked out what is happening with gay marriage laws in Europe recently?
 
Conservatives claim to want "limited government" and "smaller government", but they are lying through their teeth !
I can agree to a certain extent, some "Conservatives" - mainly the ones referred to as "Conservative" by the MSM - are not actually interested in limiting the power of government, just it's overall footprint. Their goal is to trim a little of the fat, not too much though, just enough for a more lean and mean rights violating machine.
And these hypocritical right-wing slimeballs...
But you also seek to use government to impose your belief system onto others... It's that power of government, not your neighbors belief system, that is the true threat to your liberty.
 
Yes, government can be a threat to freedom - but so can religion ! I'm not anti-christian- I anti-theocracy, or anything which brings America closer to it . I have no problem with sane, rational, reasonable and tolerant Christians . But unfortunately, too many Christians in America are none of these
things and want to use their religious beliefs as an excuse to force our government to make laws interfering with the rights of others .
I don't care what religion people flollow as long as they keep it to themselves , and have no problem with peaceful,law-abiding Muslins here
who reject terrorism and have nothing to do with it, which is true of the vast majority of Muslims in America. I'm a non-observant, secular ,
agnostic Jew myself .
 
Werbung:
I believe we are seeing the inevitable evolution of democracy. When you set up a governmental system that speaks of "for the general welfare" and "interstate commerce", plus a few other loosely defined phrases, the Constitution slowly grabs our citizens rights. Two hundred plus years later, we can see a democratic system (actually republic), where the members of government no longer speak for the people they represent, they speak for their own ideas about how things should be. A large part of the blame lies on the citizens of our country who have grown lethargic and uninformed about political issues - so their thinking and their votes rely on the information they see on TV.

I don't believe there is any "turning back" - its too late for that. What we saw with the 2008 recession is a hint of what happen in the future. When the government facing a real crisis (like bankruptcy), the government will use virtual dictatorial powers to try to correct the problem (ie, banks that are too big to fail).

It is hard to predict what will happen when the government cannot pay its bills and cannot borrow or print more money. Let us hope we will be fortunate enough to have a group of new "founding fathers" like the ones who transitioned the 13 colonies from the Articles of Confederation to the current US Constitution. The other possibility is we experience our own "American Spring" which turns into the 2nd Civil War. Those emotions still linger deep as well.
 
Back
Top