Marijuana U.S.A.

"Fifty-seven percent of Ohio voters approved a ballot measure (Issue 2) legalizing marijuana possession, home-cultivation, and sales in 2023.
.
Lawmakersarrogant decision to undermine Issue 2 is a slap in the face to millions of Ohio voters,” NORML’s Deputy Director Paul Armentano said. “At the end of the day, lawmakersdesire to roll back legalization has nothing to do with the law not working as intended, and everything to do with legislators disapproving of how their constituents voted on a major public policy issue.”
.
 
Werbung:
"The adoption of statewide adult-use marijuana legalization laws is associated with declines in illicit market cannabis seizures by law enforcement and likely reduces the size of the unregulated marketplace, according to data published in the International Journal of Drug Policy.
.
Investigators determined that
adult-use legalization “was associated with a significant decrease in cannabis seizures,” both in the short-term and long-term.
.
In
Canada, which legalized marijuana sales nationwide in 2018, nearly 80 percent of cannabis consumers have transitioned from unregulated markets to the legal market."
.
 
"The consumption of state-authorized medical cannabis products is associated with significant decreases in daily anxiety levels, according to longitudinal data published in the journal Nature: Scientific Reports.
.

Patients reported the greatest mitigation in their anxiety on the days they consumed cannabis."
.
 
"Legislation (House Bill 1152) providing physicians with greater discretion to recommend medical cannabis has passed both legislative chambers with veto-proof majorities. The measure now awaits action by Republican Gov. Tate Reeves."
.
The Bible tells us the wicked will increase and wickedness will increase just before Jesus returns to destroy His enemies and set up His everlasting kingdom on earth.
 
.
"....cannot cause lethal overdose in humans...."
.
Which one o' these big words was causing you so much trouble??
.
.

Exposing The Least-Educated (i.e. MAGATS) To Marijuana Myths
.
.
View attachment 30207
.
"Big words"? Lol, I guess any word is a "big word" to you. I haven't seen any big words, I have seen numerous lies meant to seem like they are valid though. As I stated before, with your addiction and reduced mental capacity facts are too complicated for you. It seems like the only thing you can cite are lies that you think will support your addiction...
 
Nothing on this planet, or in this Universe, is "everlasting". Everything that exists, living or not, is eventually transformed.
 
You see to a pot head, their addiction is all that matters. Children getting their hands on mind altering substances is not even considered. Oh they will make vociferous arguments about the "dangers" of firearms and hope to take the second amendment away from other adults for "safety" but, children ruining their heath on drugs isn't even on their radar.
 
You see to a pot head, their addiction is all that matters. Children getting their hands on mind altering substances is not even considered. Oh they will make vociferous arguments about the "dangers" of firearms and hope to take the second amendment away from other adults for "safety" but, children ruining their heath on drugs isn't even on their radar.
.
bg,f8f8f8-flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8[1].webp
.

You "Just Say No" grads should be spending your days scripting soap-operas....
.
.
.
.
.
.

Grandma Marijuana - Mae Nutt Tells Her Story Of Compassion
.
 
Well, nothing except God's word that is!
Oh, Bullshit! That is a lie and I can prove it.
The word of the biblical character called "God" sure as hell changed. In the Old Testament, "God" ordered ever boy born must be circumcized soon after birth. This was a very important ritual for centuries. it had a good explanation, of course.

There was this problem in battles between tribal armies. The soldiers were mostly forced to enlist, and often had no strong affection to their leader, and when they saw that their side was losing, and knowing that the losing soldiers would likely be massacred, the changed clothes with a fallen enemy, so they could be on the winning side.


But when the soldier was circumsized, then he knew that this ruse would be found out and punished. That made the circumsized army more desperate, and they fought harder to avoid defeat. So the Hebrews had a tactical advantage in circumcision.


If a male pagan wanted to become a Hebrew, Jew or Israelite as an adult, this was possible only if he was properly circumsized, which is not a pleasant experience. Women were generally obliged to assume the religion of their husands, normally chosen by her parents.

So then Paul of Tarsus came along and decided that he would focus on converting pagans, because Jews were few and pagans were many. But men did not join because they did not want to be circumsized. So Paul said that Jesus didn't mind having uncircumsized followers, CHANGING "God's Word".

No one can deny any of this, because is it entirely TRUE.
 
Oh, Bullshit! That is a lie and I can prove it.
The word of the biblical character called "God" sure as hell changed. In the Old Testament, "God" ordered ever boy born must be circumcized soon after birth. This was a very important ritual for centuries. it had a good explanation, of course.


There was this problem in battles between tribal armies. The soldiers were mostly forced to enlist, and often had no strong affection to their leader, and when they saw that their side was losing, and knowing that the losing soldiers would likely be massacred, the changed clothes with a fallen enemy, so they could be on the winning side.


But when the soldier was circumsized, then he knew that this ruse would be found out and punished. That made the circumsized army more desperate, and they fought harder to avoid defeat. So the Hebrews had a tactical advantage in circumcision.

If a male pagan wanted to become a Hebrew, Jew or Israelite as an adult, this was possible only if he was properly circumsized, which is not a pleasant experience. Women were generally obliged to assume the religion of their husands, normally chosen by her parents.

So then Paul of Tarsus came along and decided that he would focus on converting pagans, because Jews were few and pagans were many. But men did not join because they did not want to be circumsized. So Paul said that Jesus didn't mind having uncircumsized followers, CHANGING "God's Word".

No one can deny any of this, because is it entirely TRUE.
OT Jews were distinguished from uncircumcised Philistines by civilized laws and traditions.
 
Werbung:
Oh, Bullshit! That is a lie and I can prove it.
The word of the biblical character called "God" sure as hell changed. In the Old Testament, "God" ordered ever boy born must be circumcized soon after birth. This was a very important ritual for centuries. it had a good explanation, of course.


There was this problem in battles between tribal armies. The soldiers were mostly forced to enlist, and often had no strong affection to their leader, and when they saw that their side was losing, and knowing that the losing soldiers would likely be massacred, the changed clothes with a fallen enemy, so they could be on the winning side.


But when the soldier was circumsized, then he knew that this ruse would be found out and punished. That made the circumsized army more desperate, and they fought harder to avoid defeat. So the Hebrews had a tactical advantage in circumcision.

If a male pagan wanted to become a Hebrew, Jew or Israelite as an adult, this was possible only if he was properly circumsized, which is not a pleasant experience. Women were generally obliged to assume the religion of their husands, normally chosen by her parents.

So then Paul of Tarsus came along and decided that he would focus on converting pagans, because Jews were few and pagans were many. But men did not join because they did not want to be circumsized. So Paul said that Jesus didn't mind having uncircumsized followers, CHANGING "God's Word".

No one can deny any of this, because is it entirely TRUE.
You've never "proven" anything that you've ever spewed. You always make some outrageous claims and then offer nothing in the way of proof, evidence nor facts to back it up. When and if someone dares to disagree with you, is immediately called names or verbally attacked, as libs usually do. Profanity is your language and when you are calling someone profane names, you are merely speaking in your native language.
 
Back
Top