Again no sources, just more of your opinion, and lack of ability to see the truth. Did you even read the article, or did you just decide you are smarter than everyone else, and need not do so?
Here is yet another one you can claim to be smarter then, more educated about, and people should just accept that you are the end all, and know all:
http://sandrp.in/Shrinking_and_sinking_delta_major_role_of_Dams_May_2014.pdf
Yeah...I read your article...lots of doom and gloom and warnings of the disaster to come with plenty of implication that man is to blame....not one mention of geologically analogous places across the face of the earth that are behaving the same way and have been behaving the same way throughout the geological record...just baseless warnings that if we don't change our ways we are doomed...and you lap that crap up as if it were manna from Heaven.
And the article from this post...begins right off shoveling bullshit...first sentence....second paragraph in the executive summary..."But today, studies and ground reports are warning us that most of the deltas around the world are shrinking due to catastrophic sea level rise. '
Which "catastrophic" sea level rise would that be? The tide gages show that the rate of sea level rise has remained basically unchanged since we started recording it...a couple of mm per year....before you sit down at the table and gobble the bullshit these people are feeding you, why don't you do just a bit of research......actual research into the topic...it is just sea level rise, not rocket surgery.
Here...peer reviewed...published in the Journal of the American Meterological Society...
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00319.1
They examined the world wide sea level change over the period of the 20th century and found that seal level rise was consistent over the 20th century with little if any acceleration in the rate of rise and that glacier mass lost was not less during the first half of the 20th century than during the second half. If you aren't able to understand what that means....just ask.
Here is an example of the sort of data manipulation that is going on within the scientific community...
Luckily, old data is still hanging around to be found to bring the fraud of the climate science modern climate science community into high relief. This is the sea level increase between 1880 and 1980 shown by NASA. The graph shows an increase of just over 3 inches of sea level increase between 1880 and 1980....
NOTE the sharp decrease in the rate of increase after 1950.
You can't really scare people with a 3 inch sea level increase over a 100 year period so the frauds in climate science increased the figure to 6 inches per century with nothing more than adjustments.... NOTE the completely FAKE acceleration after 1950.
Then in 2004, the University of Colorado showed 2.8 mm per year rate of sea level increase.
2.8 mm per year? Not very scary...even to alarmists so again, the data is heavily massaged using inappropriate, and completely fraudulent methods to achieve a 3.3mm per year rate of increase. A global isostatic adjustment was applied which is blatantly fraudulent in the context of sea level increase. Such adjustments are correct in the context of calculating ocean depth as the sea floor sinks and have absolutely no relationship to measuring sea level by satellites. Here is what the adjustments look like...I see you warmers posting this graph as "evidence" of sea level increase all the time...what a laugh....
Here is an overlay of the two graphs at the same time scale....one using valid methodology and one using calculations that are not appropriate for determining sea level increase for no other reason than to support the AGW narrative.
So some numbers got a massage and a picture was painted to give the appearance of imminent disaster. Shit happens...right? But when the "spokes agency" for modern climate science repeats the fraud as truth....we have real evidence of deliberate data corruption with the intent to deceive regarding climate change. In 1990 the IPCC said:
Then in 2013 using blatantly massaged data and obviously fraudulent graphs, the IPCC said exactly the opposite of what they said in 1990. climate science is populated with liars trapper...guilty of malfeasance, and deliberate fraud for no other reason than to gain political power. They have damaged the reputation of science so deeply that it will take many many decades after this circus is over to restore the trust in science that you climate wackos have destroyed for political reasons...and people like you simply gobble it up without question and then repeat it every chance you get like good little useful idiots.
If the science is too difficult for you, perhaps you could just look at pictures...photography has existed for some time now and strangely enough, coastal areas have been very popular subjects....for example, photos taken of the fort in Saint Augustine during the Civil war show the same tide lines as are present today....it is hard to make a rational, scientifically valid case for catastrophic sea level rise when such coastal structures across the earth are showing the claim to be nothing but the lies of hand waving hysterics.
Here...the old fort in Saint Augustine florida...note the original sea walls are still there...sea walls that were put in place in between 1692 and 1695...
Here is a photo circa 1950...
Circa 1933
Circa 1902
Such photos exist showing coastal landmarks all over the earth with the same minuscule change over time....so again...where is this catastrophic sea level rise that you and yours claim is happening right now?