More evidence that Democrats have been stuffing ballot boxes for decades

[mark francis]

Never mind what the voting fraud criminals claim to the contrary, Democrats know how to commit voting fraud and have been perfecting their criminal skills to the point that catching them is getting harder and harder. But the crooks do get caught occasionally, like in this case:

Connecticut mayoral election do-over set for this month amid election fraud investigations | Just The News 2-18-24

Connecticut mayoral election do-over set for this month amid election fraud investigations

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The reality is that some guy cheated and then got caught. There is no evidence that it is widespread. This seems to be just more Trumpling crapola so that fools like those that have a following of idiots believing them can tell us that when Trump LOSES, it is evidence that he has won, because, see there was a repeat election in Connecticut.

 

[mark francis]

The reality is that some guy cheated and then got caught. There is no evidence that it is widespread. This seems to be just more Trumpling crapola so that fools like those that have a following of idiots believing them can tell us that when Trump LOSES, it is evidence that he has won, because, see there was a repeat election in Connecticut.

A news story about one election in Connecticut will not likely convince anyone that Democrats all over the country are committing the same types of voting fraud that Democrats have a history of committing in that one state. Nevertheless, historical records prove Democrats have been committing election fraud in the US for many decades.

Ballot-Stuffers Caught on Camera Have Upended a Race for Mayor - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 11-8-23

Ballot-Stuffers Caught on Camera Have Upended a Race for Mayor
Residents of Bridgeport, Conn., are preparing to cast their ballots in what may be the most confusing election in the country.

A judge this week tossed out the results of the Democratic mayoral primary, citing surveillance video that appears to show significant voting irregularities. He ordered election officials to hold a new primary but had no authority to postpone the general election in the meantime. And so, on Tuesday, the general election will go on as planned.

What happens after that is uncertain.

“Obviously, we’re in very uncharted legal waters here,” said State Rep. Steven Stafstrom, a Democrat from Bridgeport and a co-chair of the legislature’s judiciary committee.

The city finds itself in this mess after videos surfaced that showed suspicious activity at absentee ballot drop boxes. In clip after clip, two women are seen stuffing wads of paper into the boxes.

“The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties,” Judge William Clark of the Superior Court in Bridgeport wrote in his ruling. He added, “The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result.”

Although voting fraud is rare across the country, Bridgeport, a city of about 150,000 people in the southwest part of the state, has been dogged by election improprieties in recent years.

In June, the State Election Enforcement Commission, which is investigating the primary, said there was evidence of possible criminality in the 2019 mayoral primary. Last year, a judge ordered a new Democratic primary in a state representative race over allegations of absentee ballot fraud. In 2017, a judge ordered that a Democratic primary for City Council seats be rerun after a single absentee ballot, which was improperly handled, decided the race.

In Bridgeport, Conn., a judge found evidence of mishandled ballots in the Democratic primary for mayor and ordered a revote. But first, the city will hold a general election. After that? Stay tuned. ...

Judge Clark ruled that just two women made or were directly involved in 15 incidents of drop boxes being stuffed with ballots. He wrote that the videos showed “credible evidence that the ballots were being ‘harvested’” — a process by which third-party individuals gather and submit completed absentee ballots in bulk, rather than individual voters submitting them for themselves, in violation of election laws.

Both women, the judge wrote, were “partisans” for Mr. Ganim.

Bill Bloss, Mr. Gomes’s lawyer, said his own review of the surveillance videos showed that no more than 420 people submitted ballots at Bridgeport drop boxes, but at least 1,253 ballots were submitted there.

Mr. Ganim denied any involvement. “I was as shocked as everyone when the video came out,” he said.

Both candidates said they were dismayed by the videos, and both men acknowledge that some of their supporters submitted multiple ballots.

“On both sides, there is video of the irregularities,” Mr. Ganim said. He added: “That’s not acceptable. We all want everyone’s vote to count. We all want fair elections.”

Mr. Gomes said his supporters had acted legally and had been submitting ballots for family members. The entire scandal is unfortunate, he said, adding, “Another black eye for Bridgeport.”

But the judge’s order focuses on Mr. Ganim’s supporters, some of whom appear to have submitted many ballots, many times.

“These instances do not appear to the court to be random,” Judge Clark wrote. “They appear to be conscious acts with partisan purpose.” ...

For voters, the bizarre election spectacle has been dispiriting.

“There’s just not the checks and balances,” said Anthony L. Bennett, the lead pastor of Mount Aery Baptist Church, adding, “It’s a great city, with great people, that has had a troubling history with unchecked and unaccountable governmental leadership.”

Officials are trying to regain voters’ confidence. This week, Stephanie Thomas, the Connecticut secretary of state, appointed a temporary election monitor to oversee the mayoral election.

“The public should know that everything that can be done is being done,” Ms. Thomas said.

But critics noted that many absentee ballots have already been submitted for the general election — and questioned how one person could appropriately monitor the whole election.

And election skeptics across the country, who have long pushed to restrict voting by absentee ballot, have seized upon Judge Clark’s ruling.

They argue that Bridgeport — a historically Democratic city in a deeply Democratic state — is just one of the first places that absentee ballot fraud has been caught on camera.

“That this happened here is beyond reasonable doubt,” Elon Musk wrote on X, the site formerly known as Twitter. “The only question is how common it is.”

That worries many Democrats in Connecticut, including Mr. Ganim, who noted that many of his constituents struggle to access voting places on Election Day and need the option of absentee ballots. They may have health concerns, he said, or cannot get enough time off work to vote.

Many would-be voters in Bridgeport believe they have been let down by the government once again.

“A lot of people in Bridgeport just don’t vote in general just because they always assume Joe Ganim is going to win,” said Mr. Monge, who runs Bridgeport Memes.

But, he said, the videos had angered many of his friends, perhaps spurring them to participate: “I think a lot of people are going to go out and vote.”

 

[pjmret]

A news story about one election in Connecticut will not likely convince anyone that Democrats all over the country are committing the same types of voting fraud that Democrats have a history of committing in that one state. Nevertheless, historical records prove Democrats have been committing election fraud in the US for many decades.

Ballot-Stuffers Caught on Camera Have Upended a Race for Mayor - The New York Times (nytimes.com) 11-8-23

Ballot-Stuffers Caught on Camera Have Upended a Race for Mayor
Residents of Bridgeport, Conn., are preparing to cast their ballots in what may be the most confusing election in the country.

A judge this week tossed out the results of the Democratic mayoral primary, citing surveillance video that appears to show significant voting irregularities. He ordered election officials to hold a new primary but had no authority to postpone the general election in the meantime. And so, on Tuesday, the general election will go on as planned.

What happens after that is uncertain.

“Obviously, we’re in very uncharted legal waters here,” said State Rep. Steven Stafstrom, a Democrat from Bridgeport and a co-chair of the legislature’s judiciary committee.

The city finds itself in this mess after videos surfaced that showed suspicious activity at absentee ballot drop boxes. In clip after clip, two women are seen stuffing wads of paper into the boxes.

“The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties,” Judge William Clark of the Superior Court in Bridgeport wrote in his ruling. He added, “The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result.”

Although voting fraud is rare across the country, Bridgeport, a city of about 150,000 people in the southwest part of the state, has been dogged by election improprieties in recent years.

In June, the State Election Enforcement Commission, which is investigating the primary, said there was evidence of possible criminality in the 2019 mayoral primary. Last year, a judge ordered a new Democratic primary in a state representative race over allegations of absentee ballot fraud. In 2017, a judge ordered that a Democratic primary for City Council seats be rerun after a single absentee ballot, which was improperly handled, decided the race.

In Bridgeport, Conn., a judge found evidence of mishandled ballots in the Democratic primary for mayor and ordered a revote. But first, the city will hold a general election. After that? Stay tuned. ...

Judge Clark ruled that just two women made or were directly involved in 15 incidents of drop boxes being stuffed with ballots. He wrote that the videos showed “credible evidence that the ballots were being ‘harvested’” — a process by which third-party individuals gather and submit completed absentee ballots in bulk, rather than individual voters submitting them for themselves, in violation of election laws.

Both women, the judge wrote, were “partisans” for Mr. Ganim.

Bill Bloss, Mr. Gomes’s lawyer, said his own review of the surveillance videos showed that no more than 420 people submitted ballots at Bridgeport drop boxes, but at least 1,253 ballots were submitted there.

Mr. Ganim denied any involvement. “I was as shocked as everyone when the video came out,” he said.

Both candidates said they were dismayed by the videos, and both men acknowledge that some of their supporters submitted multiple ballots.

“On both sides, there is video of the irregularities,” Mr. Ganim said. He added: “That’s not acceptable. We all want everyone’s vote to count. We all want fair elections.”

Mr. Gomes said his supporters had acted legally and had been submitting ballots for family members. The entire scandal is unfortunate, he said, adding, “Another black eye for Bridgeport.”

But the judge’s order focuses on Mr. Ganim’s supporters, some of whom appear to have submitted many ballots, many times.

“These instances do not appear to the court to be random,” Judge Clark wrote. “They appear to be conscious acts with partisan purpose.” ...

For voters, the bizarre election spectacle has been dispiriting.

“There’s just not the checks and balances,” said Anthony L. Bennett, the lead pastor of Mount Aery Baptist Church, adding, “It’s a great city, with great people, that has had a troubling history with unchecked and unaccountable governmental leadership.”

Officials are trying to regain voters’ confidence. This week, Stephanie Thomas, the Connecticut secretary of state, appointed a temporary election monitor to oversee the mayoral election.

“The public should know that everything that can be done is being done,” Ms. Thomas said.

But critics noted that many absentee ballots have already been submitted for the general election — and questioned how one person could appropriately monitor the whole election.

And election skeptics across the country, who have long pushed to restrict voting by absentee ballot, have seized upon Judge Clark’s ruling.

They argue that Bridgeport — a historically Democratic city in a deeply Democratic state — is just one of the first places that absentee ballot fraud has been caught on camera.

“That this happened here is beyond reasonable doubt,” Elon Musk wrote on X, the site formerly known as Twitter. “The only question is how common it is.”

That worries many Democrats in Connecticut, including Mr. Ganim, who noted that many of his constituents struggle to access voting places on Election Day and need the option of absentee ballots. They may have health concerns, he said, or cannot get enough time off work to vote.

Many would-be voters in Bridgeport believe they have been let down by the government once again.

“A lot of people in Bridgeport just don’t vote in general just because they always assume Joe Ganim is going to win,” said Mr. Monge, who runs Bridgeport Memes.

But, he said, the videos had angered many of his friends, perhaps spurring them to participate: “I think a lot of people are going to go out and vote.”

You must get paid by the word

You are right random scattered stories won't conv8nce anyone intelligent, but right wing idiots will fall for it

 

[mark francis]

You must get paid by the word

You are right random scattered stories won't conv8nce anyone intelligent, but right wing idiots will fall for it

It will take many words to expose all the democrat voter fraud in 2020, not to mention all the Democrat fraud in history.

 

[pjmret]

It will take many words to expose all the democrat voter fraud in 2020, not to mention all the Democrat fraud in history.

So far you have zero words after 3 years lol
But keep on being a 100 percent loser!

 

[mark francis]

So far you have zero words after 3 years lol
But keep on being a 100 percent loser!

I cannot help that you learned nothing from the facts I posted here for 3 years.

 

[pjmret]

I cannot help that you learned nothing from the facts I posted here for 3 years.

I cannot help that you lied for 3 years

 

[Boris Norris]

Never mind what the voting fraud criminals claim to the contrary, Democrats know how to commit voting fraud and have been perfecting their criminal skills to the point that catching them is getting harder and harder. But the crooks do get caught occasionally, like in this case:

Connecticut mayoral election do-over set for this month amid election fraud investigations | Just The News 2-18-24

Connecticut mayoral election do-over set for this month amid election fraud investigations

appeared to show a supporter of incumbent Democrat Mayor Joe Ganim stuffing stacks of papers into an absentee ballot drop box during the September Democratic mayoral primary election.

No evidence of course.

 

[mark francis]

appeared to show a supporter of incumbent Democrat Mayor Joe Ganim stuffing stacks of papers into an absentee ballot drop box during the September Democratic mayoral primary election.

No evidence of course.

Democrats see video evidence of voting fraud and then declare that they have never seen any evidence of fraud. Perhaps Kamala hit the head of the nail in describing the problem.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats see video evidence of voting fraud and then declare that they have never seen any evidence of fraud. Perhaps Kamala hit the head of the nail in describing the problem.

View attachment 11502

Still no evidence I see. I'll wait.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats see video evidence of voting fraud and then declare that they have never seen any evidence of fraud. Perhaps Kamala hit the head of the nail in describing the problem.

View attachment 11502

cartoons lol

 

[mark francis]

cartoons lol

Darwinian Democrat monkeys:

 

[pjmret]

Darwinian Democrat monkeys:

View attachment 11573

you are a true cartoon ***** lol

 

[mark francis]

you are a true cartoon ***** lol