more proven election fraud

[pjmret]

by republicans. lol

A judge ruled Wednesday that the Georgia Republican Party’s first vice chairman, Brian K. Pritchard, violated state election laws when he voted nine times while serving probation for a felony check forgery sentence.

Pritchard, a conservative talk show host, must pay a $5,000 fine and receive a public reprimand from the State Election Board, according to the decision by Administrative Law Judge Lisa Boggs.


not just any republican, but a state party vice chair. and a convicted felon at that, lol.

 

[mark francis]

by republicans. lol

A judge ruled Wednesday that the Georgia Republican Party’s first vice chairman, Brian K. Pritchard, violated state election laws when he voted nine times while serving probation for a felony check forgery sentence.

Pritchard, a conservative talk show host, must pay a $5,000 fine and receive a public reprimand from the State Election Board, according to the decision by Administrative Law Judge Lisa Boggs.


not just any republican, but a state party vice chair. and a convicted felon at that, lol.

Now if only Democrats had been willing to allow unbiased experts to examine their top-secret voting machines after the election, we might have found even more fraud.

 

[pjmret]

Now if only Democrats had been willing to allow unbiased experts to examine their top-secret voting machines after the election, we might have found even more fraud.

the dems i know have no problem with unbiased experts looking at machines if there is credible evidence for fraud.
but you didn't have any.

but name democrats who opposed investigations given credible evidence of fraud? you wont because you are a moron liar lol

you don't waste time and money investigating something without credible evidence first
a principle you seem too stupid to understand lol

 

[mark francis]

the dems i know have no problem with unbiased experts looking at machines if there is credible evidence for fraud.
but you didn't have any.

but name democrats who opposed investigations given credible evidence of fraud? you wont because you are a moron liar lol

you don't waste time and money investigating something without credible evidence first
a principle you seem too stupid to understand lol

Democrats absolutely do not need anyone finding out how many illegals actually voted.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats absolutely do not need anyone finding out how many illegals actually voted.

you think illegals only vote for democrats? lol.
god you're stupid.

 

[mark francis]

you think illegals only vote for democrats? lol.
god you're stupid.

I think Democrats do not want Americans finding out how many illegals voted regardless of who they voted for.

 

[pjmret]

I think Democrats do not want Americans finding out how many illegals voted regardless of who they voted for.

of course you think that, as a lying right wing whining moron.

 

[Phoenix68]

Now if only Democrats had.....

.

.​

 

[Boris Norris]

Now if only Democrats had been willing to allow unbiased experts to examine their top-secret voting machines after the election, we might have found even more fraud.

You're like a cracked record. They were examined and you know you jerk.
Go somewhere else with your bullshit bitterness.

 

[mark francis]

You're like a cracked record. They were examined and you know you jerk.
Go somewhere else with your bullshit bitterness.

You suffer from the same shortage other lefties suffer from. In spite of all the evidence they claim they have they cannot produce even one report from non-biased examiners who examined even one of tens of thousands of voting machines and found clear evidence that the machine was not tampered with in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

You suffer from the same shortage other lefties suffer from. In spite of all the evidence they claim they have they cannot produce even one report from non-biased examiners who examined even one of tens of thousands of voting machines and found clear evidence that the machine was not tampered with in 2020.

https://www.maricopa.gov/5681/Elections-Equipment-Audit

here ya go, moron. lol.
you are so stupid.

 

[mark francis]

https://www.maricopa.gov/5681/Elections-Equipment-Audit

here ya go, moron. lol.
you are so stupid.

There was a lot going on in Arizona that you failed to mention. However, since you posted evidence of an investigation of one voting machine among thousands, let's see what non-democrat officials had to say about the audit:

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results – US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance (electionfraud20.org)

10-25-21

US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance

The film 2000 Mules shows True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Texas. Learn more​

Reports by State › Arizona ›Maricopa County Forensic Audit ›

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results

On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.

The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity. 1

The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2020/12/why-do-they-refuse-to-look-at-voting-machine-vulnerabilities/ 12-21-20

1. Prior to November 3, 2020, it was not only acceptable to question voting machine vulnerabilities, it was basically considered a universal truth that the machines were vulnerable. ...

2. There are clear and undeniable statistical anomalies in 2020 that in the past would have been considered strong evidence of fraud demanding investigation. ...

3. The media, the courts, and election officials refuse to let anyone investigate properly. Why? ...

Democrats "fight like hell" to maintain total control of voting machines used in national elections and they come up with all sorts of reasons for why they should never allow outsiders to see what is going on behind the scenes with their politically protected vulnerable machines.

For the most part, the Courts have likewise ignored cases calling for a look at the machines. One notable exception was in Antrim County, Michigan, where a group was allowed to do a forensic review. The report appears damning although it was almost immediately challenged by the Dominion CEO. From my perspective, however, the Dominion CEO appeared evasive, to say the least, and others seem to agree. When the Antrim report was presented by Russ Ramsland, it was filled with court-ordered redactions. Why? What is being hidden?

In Arizona, a State Senate committee subpeonaed the machines and also the ballots for a thorough forensic audit. They should have authority as the Constitution rests responsibility for Federal Elections in the state legislatures. But the election officials in Maricopa County refuse to comply and have even sued to stop the review. Again, what are they hiding? They are claiming some kind of extraordinary privilege to protect identities. But the fact is that they themselves access this information and hire minimum wage workers to do the same. And please don’t tell me that the precinct workers and election officials are “nonpartisan.” We know better.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wir...n-chief-gop-audited-machines-dropped-77816307 5-21-21

Arizona election chief: GOP-audited machines must be dropped

 

[pjmret]

There was a lot going on in Arizona that you failed to mention. However, since you posted evidence of an investigation of one voting machine among thousands, let's see what non-democrat officials had to say about the audit:

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results – US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance (electionfraud20.org)

10-25-21

US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance

The film 2000 Mules shows True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Texas. Learn more​

Reports by State › Arizona ›Maricopa County Forensic Audit ›

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results

On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.

The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity. 1

The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://globaleconomicwarfare.com/2020/12/why-do-they-refuse-to-look-at-voting-machine-vulnerabilities/ 12-21-20

1. Prior to November 3, 2020, it was not only acceptable to question voting machine vulnerabilities, it was basically considered a universal truth that the machines were vulnerable. ...

2. There are clear and undeniable statistical anomalies in 2020 that in the past would have been considered strong evidence of fraud demanding investigation. ...

3. The media, the courts, and election officials refuse to let anyone investigate properly. Why? ...

Democrats "fight like hell" to maintain total control of voting machines used in national elections and they come up with all sorts of reasons for why they should never allow outsiders to see what is going on behind the scenes with their politically protected vulnerable machines.

For the most part, the Courts have likewise ignored cases calling for a look at the machines. One notable exception was in Antrim County, Michigan, where a group was allowed to do a forensic review. The report appears damning although it was almost immediately challenged by the Dominion CEO. From my perspective, however, the Dominion CEO appeared evasive, to say the least, and others seem to agree. When the Antrim report was presented by Russ Ramsland, it was filled with court-ordered redactions. Why? What is being hidden?

In Arizona, a State Senate committee subpeonaed the machines and also the ballots for a thorough forensic audit. They should have authority as the Constitution rests responsibility for Federal Elections in the state legislatures. But the election officials in Maricopa County refuse to comply and have even sued to stop the review. Again, what are they hiding? They are claiming some kind of extraordinary privilege to protect identities. But the fact is that they themselves access this information and hire minimum wage workers to do the same. And please don’t tell me that the precinct workers and election officials are “nonpartisan.” We know better.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wir...n-chief-gop-audited-machines-dropped-77816307 5-21-21

Arizona election chief: GOP-audited machines must be dropped

where did it say only one voting machine?

let me know when you can prove the independent audit was faulty. all you have is whining
quoting from the "cyber ninjas" (hahahahahahahhaha) proves nothing about the audit I linked. duh

 

[mark francis]

where did it say only one voting machine?

let me know when you can prove the independent audit was faulty. all you have is whining
quoting from the "cyber ninjas" (hahahahahahahhaha) proves nothing about the audit I linked. duh

Perhaps the report lists problerms with the totals obtained by the private firm hired by election officials to count the votes without interference from election observers. Nevertheless, here are some of the problems the investigators were supposed to look into:

US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance

• Reports by State​

  Follow the Data​

  Further Articles​

The film 2000 Mules shows True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Texas. Learn more
Reports by State › Arizona ›Maricopa County Forensic Audit ›

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results​

On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.

The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity. 1

The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.
► Show Full List of Reports
Major issues identified:

• 255,326 early votes are recorded in the VM55 file of counted ballots but are missing from the EV33 file 2
• 17,322 duplicate votes (where voters sent in 2 or more ballots) that were illegally counted in the final certified tally (a large surge of these were dated the week following the election) 3
• 27,807 ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election, and are unlikely to have physically received their ballots legally
• Envelopes without signatures that were stamped as “approved”
• Ballot envelopes showing an apparent “approved” stamp behind the basic graphics of the envelope, suggesting tampering, or at the very least, poor quality scanning and archival of envelope images
• The systems related to elections integrity had numbers that could not balance or agree with each other
• The voter rolls and the registration management process itself having many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
• Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which there is no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address
• Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed
• There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election
• There was back-dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server and other voting machines, either intentionally or negligently removed
• Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing
• Logs appeared to have been intentionally overwritten
• All data in one database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully wiped. This occurred on the day prior to Maricopa’s own internal audit. 4
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, some originals were duplicated more than once, and the auditors were never provided chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
• There were significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on-demand printed ballots, and a significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.
• Maricopa County failed to follow basic cyber security best practices and guidelines from CISA 5
• Remote Access and “Terminal Services” features of Windows were enabled allowing machines to be remotely controlled 5
• Software and patch protocols were not followed 5
• Credential management was flawed: unique usernames and passwords were not allocated. Many (if not all) accounts shared the same password, and multiple users appear to have shared the same account. 5
• A dual-boot configuration was discovered on adjudication equipment which is not an approved configuration. The second hard drive contained non-Maricopa County data.

Here is a summary table from the Cyber Ninjas report (Volume III). This does not include the 17,322 duplicate ballots found by Dr. Shiva (EchoMail) and the 255,326 early votes that appear in the VM55 but are missing from EV33 file.

 

[pjmret]

Perhaps the report lists problerms with the totals obtained by the private firm hired by election officials to count the votes without interference from election observers. Nevertheless, here are some of the problems the investigators were supposed to look into:

US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance

• Reports by State​

  Follow the Data​

  Further Articles​

The film 2000 Mules shows True the Vote’s video evidence of a coordinated, funded, illegal ballot trafficking network across critical swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Texas. Learn more
Reports by State › Arizona ›Maricopa County Forensic Audit ›

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results​

On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.

The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.
► Show Full List of Reports
Major issues identified:

• 255,326 early votes are recorded in the VM55 file of counted ballots but are missing from the EV33 file 2
• 17,322 duplicate votes (where voters sent in 2 or more ballots) that were illegally counted in the final certified tally (a large surge of these were dated the week following the election) 3
• 27,807 ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election, and are unlikely to have physically received their ballots legally
• Envelopes without signatures that were stamped as “approved”
• Ballot envelopes showing an apparent “approved” stamp behind the basic graphics of the envelope, suggesting tampering, or at the very least, poor quality scanning and archival of envelope images
• The systems related to elections integrity had numbers that could not balance or agree with each other
• The voter rolls and the registration management process itself having many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
• Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which there is no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address
• Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed
• There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election
• There was back-dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server and other voting machines, either intentionally or negligently removed
• Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing
• Logs appeared to have been intentionally overwritten
• All data in one database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully wiped. This occurred on the day prior to Maricopa’s own internal audit. 4
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, some originals were duplicated more than once, and the auditors were never provided chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
• There were significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on-demand printed ballots, and a significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.
• Maricopa County failed to follow basic cyber security best practices and guidelines from CISA 5
• Remote Access and “Terminal Services” features of Windows were enabled allowing machines to be remotely controlled 5
• Software and patch protocols were not followed 5
• Credential management was flawed: unique usernames and passwords were not allocated. Many (if not all) accounts shared the same password, and multiple users appear to have shared the same account. 5
• A dual-boot configuration was discovered on adjudication equipment which is not an approved configuration. The second hard drive contained non-Maricopa County data.

Here is a summary table from the Cyber Ninjas report (Volume III). This does not include the 17,322 duplicate ballots found by Dr. Shiva (EchoMail) and the 255,326 early votes that appear in the VM55 but are missing from EV33 file.

Let me know when you have proof of actual fraud. The so-called cyber ninjas had 0 experience at auditing elections so they have no credibility