Musings; Neil deGrasse Tyson

[Phoenix68]

Musings; Neil deGrasse Tyson.
.

.​

 

[mark francis]

Musings; Neil deGrasse Tyson.
.

.​

The rambling imaginations of a mushed-up mind.

 

[Boris Norris]

The rambling imaginations of a mushed-up mind.

It's another instance of you hating someone telling that truth.
Just imagine how great the country would be if godbotherers dropped all the religious items that stopped progress. Courts wasting time in abortion issues to pander to believers when there is no god involved. Hate the progressive of liberals because they simply hate liberals and nothing else. Even to the point they are branded as atheists which is not correct.
Don't ever believe that religion ever improved one country.

 

[mark francis]

It's another instance of you hating someone telling that truth.
Just imagine how great the country would be if godbotherers dropped all the religious items that stopped progress. Courts wasting time in abortion issues to pander to believers when there is no god involved. Hate the progressive of liberals because they simply hate liberals and nothing else. Even to the point they are branded as atheists which is not correct.
Don't ever believe that religion ever improved one country.

DeGrasse does not dare debate a scientist with different views and good arguments.

 

[Boris Norris]

DeGrasse does not dare debate a scientist with different views and good arguments.

He doesn't debate people of similar mind.
There's not one godbotherer who will debate him is what you mean.
Why are you advocating science as factual when you hate the thought of them exposing your silly god myths? Maybe you're having a little sabbatical from the rubbish you spread.

 

[mark francis]

He doesn't debate people of similar mind.
There's not one godbotherer who will debate him is what you mean.
Why are you advocating science as factual when you hate the thought of them exposing your silly god myths? Maybe you're having a little sabbatical from the rubbish you spread.

He sounds good as long as nobody is allowed to debate him, but his grasp of science in nowhere near the level of expertise his followers wish to believe.

‘They Were Wrong’: Neil deGrasse Tyson Stopped Dead in His Tracks by Interviewer’s Vaccine Question

One thing an ethical, competent scientist should never proclaim is that the science is settled. Science is constantly changing, with

ijr.com

In a Monday interview, media personality Neil deGrasse Tyson, whose credibility hinges on scientific credentials, attempted to make the kind of “the science is settled” claims used during the early phases of the pandemic to defend his COVID policy preferences. What he did not provide was proof that science still supports those claims. Challenges to Tyson’s talking points left him speechless.

 

[Boris Norris]

He sounds good as long as nobody is allowed to debate him, but his grasp of science in nowhere near the level of expertise his followers wish to believe.

‘They Were Wrong’: Neil deGrasse Tyson Stopped Dead in His Tracks by Interviewer’s Vaccine Question

One thing an ethical, competent scientist should never proclaim is that the science is settled. Science is constantly changing, with

ijr.com

In a Monday interview, media personality Neil deGrasse Tyson, whose credibility hinges on scientific credentials, attempted to make the kind of “the science is settled” claims used during the early phases of the pandemic to defend his COVID policy preferences. What he did not provide was proof that science still supports those claims. Challenges to Tyson’s talking points left him speechless.

He's an astrophysicist. I don't believe he thought he was FAUCI.
Did you notice the interviewer was a right wing godbotherers with the same ignorant views as you? Of course you did. You have a direct from the Jesus junkies.

I'll believe tyson long before a godbotherer.

 

[mark francis]

He's an astrophysicist. I don't believe he thought he was FAUCI.
Did you notice the interviewer was a right wing godbotherers with the same ignorant views as you? Of course you did. You have a direct from the Jesus junkies.

I'll believe tyson long before a godbotherer.

The genius expresses his unscientific opinions about God. That is not science, it is baloney. His argument falls completely apart when examined logically. If he claims disasters and troubles are themselves evidence that God does not exist, then does that mean that the evidence proves some other natural force is causing the disasters? Secularists don't have a clue. Disasters no more disprove God than death disproves the origin of life.

De Grasse Tyson debate with Christian astrophysicist - Suchen Videos

www.bing.com

Neil deGrasse Tyson on God

 

[Boris Norris]

The genius expresses his unscientific opinions about God. That is not science, it is baloney.

No it's fact. You think it's crap because it conflicts with your filthy religion. You have no evidence of any god whatsoever and you know it. You're a fraud.

His argument falls completely apart when examined logically. If he claims disasters and troubles are themselves evidence that God does not exist, then does that mean that the evidence proves some other natural force is causing the disasters? Secularists don't have a clue. Disasters no more disprove God than death disproves the origin of life.

De Grasse Tyson debate with Christian astrophysicist - Suchen Videos

www.bing.com

Neil deGrasse Tyson on God

 

[Boris Norris]

The genius expresses his unscientific opinions about God.

So you have evidence of god that is supported by science??? You said his opinions were unscientific. Prove it.

That is not science, it is baloney. His argument falls completely apart when examined logically.

That's the point. Your argument is not logical. Some big ghost in the sky did it all and you call that logic? You're a mug.

If he claims disasters and troubles are themselves evidence that God does not exist, then does that mean that the evidence proves some other natural force is causing the disasters?

Yes. We know what causes earthquakes and floods and tsunamis etc. Every single event is explained. No god involved.

Secularists don't have a clue. Disasters no more disprove God than death disproves the origin of life.

Ok. Which disaster can you say with irrefutable evidence was caused by god? Don't divert or not answer. See how good you are.

De Grasse Tyson debate with Christian astrophysicist - Suchen Videos

www.bing.com

Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

[mark francis]

No it's fact. You think it's crap because it conflicts with your filthy religion. You have no evidence of any god whatsoever and you know it. You're a fraud.

How do disasters scientifically disprove God? They don't, but don't try to convince pompous secularist geniuses like de Grasse that fact.

 

[mark francis]

So you have evidence of god that is supported by science??? You said his opinions were unscientific. Prove it.


That's the point. Your argument is not logical. Some big ghost in the sky did it all and you call that logic? You're a mug.


Yes. We know what causes earthquakes and floods and tsunamis etc. Every single event is explained. No god involved.

Ok. Which disaster can you say with irrefutable evidence was caused by god? Don't divert or not answer. See how good you are.

Secular science cannot speculate on what it cannot see or measure. God cannot be seen or measured by natural senses but that in no way can be interpreted to mean that He does not exist.

 

[Boris Norris]

Secular science cannot speculate on what it cannot see or measure. God cannot be seen or measured by natural senses but that in no way can be interpreted to mean that He does not exist.

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Give science something to measure etc and they'll test it. You won't because you have nothing but delusions.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and you have nothing to support your silly god shit.

 

[Boris Norris]

How do disasters scientifically disprove God? They don't, but don't try to convince pompous secularist geniuses like de Grasse that fact.

I'll ask again and you'll avoid it again because you have nothing.

Name one disaster that you can prove god did. Just one.

See how your big mouth responds to that.

 

[mark francis]

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

You cannot prove any origin of life theory that omits God because there is no evidence of spontaneous generation of life. Therefore any and all alternative theories to God's creation of original life on earth can be dismissed.