Navarro's blistering 36-page report alleging Biden's outright voter fraud

[pjmret]

Democrats shot themselves in the foot by destroying photo images of ballots in 2020 in clear violation of election laws. Now democrats cannot possibly prove that they did not run illegitimate ballots through their machines as observers claimed in sworn testimony. Not only that but there is still the matter of election fraud for destroying photo images of ballots they were not supposed to destroy.

democrats did it? all the counties were run by democrats?

 

[Boris Norris]

Theres one thing you keep avoiding and that is, Biden won and was certified without any detected fraud. So bang on all you like, the party's over

Neither party should have total control over voting machines in national elections.

Besides machines that were caught flipping votes democrats blamed on "glitches," and apart from thousands of votes being flipped from Trump to Biden on live TV on Nov 3, there is this evidence of voting machines flipping votes in 2022:

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes” | The Wentworth Report

Georgia Election Fraud Revealed: Result flips after a hand count revealed voting machine “mistakes”. By Emerald Robinson.

According to the local paper Decaturish: DeKalb County (GA) just released the results of a hand count in the District 2County Commission primary race — and the hand count revealed such massive discrepancies between the May 24th machine results and the June 1 hand count that it has flipped the race! …

The machines did not count 2,810 votes at all — mostly from Election Day ballots. That’s almost 20% of the total votes that mysteriously disappeared …

The machines also counted only 589 votes for the candidate Michelle Long Spears on May 24th and placed her third in the race but the June 1st hand count discovered 3,491 more votes for her. Suddenly, she’s winning the race. …

The real bombshell is why there was a hand count conducted at all in this race. It only happened because the candidate Michelle Long Spears took pictures of the precinct-level results and showed them to the local media site Decaturish and those machine “results” showed that Michelle Long Spears was getting zero votes in her own precinct. In other words: obvious fraud. …

New and corrupt databases created ! Mistakes in the precinct scanners! Thousands of votes not counted! Thousands of votes miscounted for multiple candidates! Hand counts conducted to correct the machine counts!

Guess what folks: it’s called election fraud using the electronic voting machines.

Are you ready for the best part of the story?

It’s a primary race for Democrats.

Paper ballots, hand counted under scrutiny by all interested parties. Until then, US election results are not credible.



Voting machine "glitches" involving flipped votes, added ghost votes, and so forth did not surface in America until after voting machines in Venezuela were used by crooks to destroy that nation by fraud. George Soros was a key investor/owner of the voting machines used in the Venezuelan fraud and Soros remains a key factor in Dominion machines used in questionable election results in America for the last decade, particularly since 2016. Here is a history of voting machines connected to George Soros that should not be ignored:

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud (caracol.com)

US Voting Machines Made in Venezuela made for Election Fraud​

US Vote Machines Made in Venezuela for Election Fraud made by Smartmatic Inc.

Stop the Ballot Madness! Today’s US electronic vote system, used in Trump v. Biden, including swing states, was originally designed, funded and deployed in communist Venezuela. Co-owned by the Venezuelan government and state-owned Bitza software. CIA reported in first use, Smartmatic falsified an election for dictator Hugo Chavez to stymie a recall. Says NY Times:

“Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.”

Does Smartmatic still sabotage elections?

Related:
• UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines
• SHOCK: US Vote Machines First Used in Communist State to Throw Election by Subterfuge!

Smartmatic: Banana Republicans: So, the first Smartmatic machine was designed to cheat residents in a banana republic to keep a dangerous dictator in power. Smartmatic vote machines are owned and run by Geo Soros’ lieutenant Lord Mark Malloch Brown and Venezuelan computer engineer Antonio Mugica. This company then circled the globe, including America, selling Smartmatic vote systems. But a Filipina Senator wants to know, “how a foreign firm hounded by controversy won the bid to set up the national ID system of Philippines.” See UNBELIEVABLE: George Soros Employee Owns Defective Switch-Vote Biden Machines.

Venezuelan Voting Machine: ANY Times article stated:

“The federal government is investigating takeover last year of a leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company linked to the leftist Venezuelan government of President Hugo Chávez. The inquiry is focusing on the Venezuelan owners of the software company, the Smartmatic Corporation, trying to determine whether the government in Caracas has any control or influence over the firm’s operations.”

Smartmatic Adopted by Tyrantictator Hugo Chavez chose Smartmatic, despite – or perhaps because of – being the company’s first time providing election machines. Smartmatic joined with Venezuelan software company, Bitza. Writes NY Times:
So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities, Is there any chance Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

“Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan government financing agency invested $200,000+ into a smaller technology company, owned by the same people as Smartmatic, joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid. In return, the government agency was given a 28% stake in the smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. “

In 2007, Smartmatic added a million fake votes to another Venezuela election.

CIA Investigates Foreign Vote Fraud: The Smartmatic communist partnership raised red flags. In the actual Venezuela 2004 vote, Chavez faced recall, behind 40% to 60% in polling. Yet, in the election, Chavez squeaked out a 52%-48% win. Wrote McClatchy: “Appearing last month before a U.S. Election Assistance Commission field hearing in Orlando, Fla., a CIA cybersecurity expert suggested that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his allies fixed a 2004 election recount.” Smartmatic is apparently not proud of Venezuela’s 2004 vote, since their history strangely omits this damning info.

CIA: Smartmatic’s FIRST Election Was Rigged: Computer voting expert Steve Stigall responded, telling the Election Assistance Commission that “computerized electoral systems are vulnerable at 5 stages, by altering voter registration lists to posting results.” Stigall added voting equipment connected to the Internet can be hacked, and machines not connected can be hacked wirelessly.” McClatchy observes:

“When Chavez won, Venezuelan mathematicians challenged results that showed him to be consistently strong in parts of the country where he had weak support. The mathematicians found “a very subtle algorithm” that appeared to adjust the vote in Chavez’s favor.”

CONCLUSION: Connect the Dots: The US Smartmatic voting system wasn’t designed in America but in communist Venezuela, first used by Dictator Hugo Chavez, sponsored by his government as co-owner, educated by Bitza state software. A mere 16 years ago. Designed and first deployed to defraud a recall election, claims CIA. Today, Venezuela is a failed nation whose people are trapped in a living hell, dying without food or medicine. This might not have happened if Smartmatic had not willfully cooperated in election fraud. Smartmatic was then deployed to America where it is now in the midst of apparent massive election fraud. So, given the machine’s origins, purpose, record, and abilities – What are the chances that Smartmatic did not help throw this election?

Failing to see the fraud does not mean no fraud occurred. That is true whether it is a judge, a priest, a guru, a politician, or whoever who claims he sees no fraud.

The irony is youre the only one who can see it. Show it to a judge.

 

[mark francis]

democrats did it? all the counties were run by democrats?

Maybe some counties were run by republicans. All counties, whether democrat or republican, that destroyed ballot images against the law are guilty of violating election fraud laws in place for the specific purpose of preventing election fraud. Those clear violations of election laws should have been examined in a court of law.

 

[Boris Norris]

I do not admit there was no evidence of fraud but I will admit that is what democrats claim but cannot support with logical and believable explanations for all the appearances they claim were not fraud.

Of course they can't because there is none. Youre the only one on earth with information but won't go to the police. Take it to your silly god. He'll give it a blessing wrap it in grace and condemn all those evil atheist democrats to hell. That'll fix em.

 

[mark francis]

The irony is youre the only one who can see it. Show it to a judge.

I have posted credible evidence of ballot duplications and destruction of photo images in violation of election laws put in place to prevent fraud. It is the crowd resisting claims of violations of election laws that do not prove their claims that nobody broke election laws.

 

[pjmret]

Maybe some counties were run by republicans. All counties, whether democrat or republican, that destroyed ballot images against the law are guilty of violating election fraud laws in place for the specific purpose of preventing election fraud. Those clear violations of election laws should have been examined in a court of law.

sure, if laws were violated it should be examined. who denies that?

but unless you can show that it was done by democrats in the 2020 election to cover fraud, then it, well, doesn't show that democrats committed fraud. duh

nothing wrong with improving election processes, but you're on the hook to prove fraud or be laughed at

 

[mark francis]

Of course they can't because there is none. Youre the only one on earth with information but won't go to the police. Take it to your silly god. He'll give it a blessing wrap it in grace and condemn all those evil atheist democrats to hell. That'll fix em.

As long as computer images cannot be checked to verify the precinct workers' claims that duplicate ballots were not run through computers where observers swore that was happening, the election workers can never clear their names in the matter, especially since destroying voting machine images is a violation of election laws.

 

[Boris Norris]

As long as computer images cannot be checked to verify the precinct workers' claims that duplicate ballots were not run through computers where observers swore that was happening, the election workers can never clear their names in the matter, especially since destroying voting machine images is a violation of election laws.

Of course and youre the only one with that evidence. Yet you expect rational human beings and the judicial system to bow to your demands. Like all godbotherers, youre delusional.

 

[mark francis]

sure, if laws were violated it should be examined. who denies that?

but unless you can show that it was done by democrats in the 2020 election to cover fraud, then it, well, doesn't show that democrats committed fraud. duh

nothing wrong with improving election processes, but you're on the hook to prove fraud or be laughed at

Let's try to separate the emotional issue of voter fraud from the clear fact that persons unknown destroyed photo images of computer ballots in clear violation of election laws. That itself is a crime that should be investigated and if persons are found guilty they should be made to pay for their crimes just like other criminals.

 

[mark francis]

Of course and youre the only one with that evidence. Yet you expect rational human beings and the judicial system to bow to your demands. Like all godbotherers, youre delusional.

I posted the evidence I found online and nobody has yet refuted the evidence as far as I know.

 

[Boris Norris]

Let's try to separate the emotional issue of voter fraud from the clear fact that persons unknown destroyed photo images of computer ballots in clear violation of election laws.

persons unknown? You'll have to better than that to prove anything was done.

That itself is a crime that should be investigated and if persons are found guilty they should be made to pay for their crimes just like other criminals.

Unknown persons dont get penalised. Youre grasping at straws and desperate.
You been torturing your brain for weeks about this and the best youve got is, wait for it, unknown persons.

Got that everybody? This petulant adolescent little republican wants blood regardless. How merciful of the jesus junkies. God must love the likes of you.

 

[mark francis]

persons unknown? You'll have to better than that to prove anything was done.

Unknown persons dont get penalised. Youre grasping at straws and desperate.
You been torturing your brain for weeks about this and the best youve got is, wait for it, unknown persons.

Got that everybody? This petulant adolescent little republican wants blood regardless. How merciful of the jesus junkies. God must love the likes of you.

We know photo images were destroyed by someone. Just because I have no idea who committed the crime does not mean the crime was not committed.

 

[Boris Norris]

We know photo images were destroyed by someone. Just because I have no idea who committed the crime does not mean the crime was not committed.

If you have no idea who did it, how can you be sure you know anything was destroyed.

You are blindly digging yourself into a hole. You have proven NOTHING since you started. Youre a petulant ignorant godbotherer who think you're working for God to expose those evil atheist democrats.

Grow up my friend. The election is over, there was no fraud detected and Biden is now the potus. SURELY, that must register with even the most galvanised republican, you lost..
But if the anger and frustration continues, see your ring reaming pastor and ask for a blessing, some grace and a good dose of alter wine. Thats always soothing.

Everytime you reply I get another swing at you. Keep going.

 

[pjmret]

We know photo images were destroyed by someone. Just because I have no idea who committed the crime does not mean the crime was not committed.

no doubt every election some laws are broken. no one disputes that.

the issue here is "massive fraud by democrats to steal the election", not "were any laws broken somewhere by someone". duh

 

[pjmret]

Let's try to separate the emotional issue of voter fraud from the clear fact that persons unknown destroyed photo images of computer ballots in clear violation of election laws. That itself is a crime that should be investigated and if persons are found guilty they should be made to pay for their crimes just like other criminals.

of course, any law breaking should be investigated. who is arguing otherwise? lol.

but its totally irrelevant to your stupid claim about "massive voter fraud!"