One Termer?

[Gipper]

Based on BO's actions of late, one wonders if he really wants re-election. But he is an egotist who believes he knows all. So, I find it hard to believe he is looking to get out.

But, this column does a good job of outlining BO's failures and the Dems who have turned on him. Even Chrissy (Tingle Me) Matthews wonders why BO is seeking a second term...

The Ds are in complete disarray, but the media claims the Rs are really a mess. Its hilarious.

Does Obama really want to win?

Crazy? Not according to two Democratic strategists. Patrick H. Caddell, who coincidentally worked as a pollster for Mr. Carter, and Douglas Schoen think Mr. Obama should follow LBJ and just pack it in.

“He should abandon his candidacy for re-election in favor of a clear alternative, one capable not only of saving the Democratic Party, but more important, of governing effectively and in a way that preserves the most important of the president’s accomplishments. He should step aside,” they wrote, “for the one candidate who would become, by acclamation, the nominee of the Democratic Party: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”

Of course, Mr. Obama’s hubris will not allow such a move. But consider this, 344 days before Election Day 2012: The president’s greatest advocate, Chris Matthews, who got a chill up his leg every time he heard the candidate speak, has thrown in the towel.

Mr. Matthews went on: “What are we trying to do in this administration? Why does he want a second term? Would he tell us? What’s he going to do in the second term? More of this? Is this it? Is this as good as it gets? Where are we going? Are we going to do something the second term? He has yet to tell us. He has not said one thing about what he would do in the second term.”

Because he doesn’t really want one. And Americans seem ready to oblige.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/27/curl-does-obama-really-want-to-win/?page=1

 

[Alias]

The blame lies with all these stupid lazy Americans who stand in his way. Obama isn't failing. We are. That's the campaign theme.

 

[dogtowner]

I've been wondering about this for 4 years.

 

[Phoenix68]

Based on BO's actions of late, one wonders if he really wants re-election. But he is an egotist who believes he knows all. So, I find it hard to believe he is looking to get out.
.
But, this column does a good job of outlining BO's failures and the Dems who have turned on him. Even Chrissy (Tingle Me) Matthews wonders why BO is seeking a second term...
.
The Ds are in complete disarray, but the media claims the Rs are really a mess. Its hilarious.

.
How comical....running-across these White-wing droppings....back, before they got their collective-noses rubbed in actual American history!!!
.​

"Since World War II, according to many economic metrics including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth, and corporate profits, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administrations of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents."

.

.
Where Would We Be, Without Democratic Economies?????
.​

 

[mark francis]

.
How comical....running-across these White-wing droppings....back, before they got their collective-noses rubbed in actual American history!!!
.​

"Since World War II, according to many economic metrics including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth, and corporate profits, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administrations of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents."

.
View attachment 28229
.
Where Would We Be, Without Democratic Economies?????
.​

Democrats are Keynesians from way back who believe only the government creates wealth and the government is immune from bankruptcy and without government spending and injections of newly printed cash the economy would collapse. Keynesians are incompetent at understanding financial laws and consequences.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

If there is a Democrat in the White House, the odds have been that investors will benefit more. This has been true since Eisenhower left office in 1961.

And investing is all about the odds.

 

[mark francis]

If there is a Democrat in the White House, the odds have been that investors will benefit more. This has been true since Eisenhower left office in 1961.

And investing is all about the odds.

 

[mark francis]

Democrats like to gamble even though their gambling failures have been long and lasting, especially their gambles on the 3 stooges Brandon, Kackles, and Tampon Tim.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The stock market is not gambling for most successful investors. It is possible to gamble doing day trades and puts and calls. It seems to be yet another thing that you are ignorant about.

 

[mark francis]

The stock market is not gambling for most successful investors. It is possible to gamble doing day trades and puts and calls. It seems to be yet another thing that you are ignorant about.

I prefer to think those who lost big on the stock market lost their money to bad gambles.