Gipper
Well-Known Member
It is sick.
Why not allow the teachers to arm themselves. OH NO!!!!....screams the lib and uninformed.
-
Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum
School shooter in Connecticut
- Thread starter PLC1
- Start date
It is sick.
Why not allow the teachers to arm themselves. OH NO!!!!....screams the lib and uninformed.
Werbung:
Dawkinsrocks
Well-Known Member
What kind of fucked up country has to seriously consider arming teachers?
Guns are readily available in the US and they are used to kill thousands of Americans each year
And even after this terrible tragedy the right is still defending gun ownership
This perfectly exemplifies their imbecility
Guns are readily available in the US and they are used to kill thousands of Americans each year
And even after this terrible tragedy the right is still defending gun ownership
This perfectly exemplifies their imbecility
Rafael Norma
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,201
Connecticut: Error Of The $pecies
By Alfredo C. VilledaThe tears of hypocrisy. Stunning self deception. The mourning of intentional forgetfulness. The artificial drama of pain and chest beating. Today only the tragedy is real.
Another killing in a U.S. school. Another tearful speech and a flag at half staff. Another four-day duel. Another weak crusade against indiscriminate sale of weapons, off again, for the first delirious rant that the Constitution and freedom are first of all.
When alleging a law above human life, there is an error in the Matrix. The abuses in the non sanctioned apartheid and exclusion against blacks, because the law did not provide for such cases, which have become normal in South Africa was legal, although immoral.
To defend with a rifle, the right to have a gun in your hand is a huge failure, without any consideration not omly to a good portion of the American people, or its laws, but of all the species. The traditional call to fight this amendment, because many of these weapons are coming at the hands of Mexican organized crime is a maddening intellectual narrowness.
For the tragedy extends beyond the 58,398 dead Mexicans in recently concluded six years government. Today we witness another massacre of children, toddlers who were in preschool through fourth grade, innocent victims of a law that puts unwarranted liberty to purchase a rifle above human life.
This year alone there were five similar episodes in the United States with a creepy cluster of 56 deaths, many of them children, oblivious to all the vagaries of the National Rifle Association, a powerful group that decides on a tantrum in politics. Omnipotent society that puts its agenda, disappearing any discussions.
If the immigration issue was always ignored in the recent debate of presidential candidates in pursuit of the White House, the issue of arms sales seemed outlawed. By tradition, the Republican Party, receiving enthusiastic contributions of warmongers, dismisses the matter, and Democratic rival is always the promise of reviving it. But pure simulation. First the votes, after the lives missed.
Michael Moore had already exhibited such violent elite in his documentary Bowling for Columbine (2002), in which George W. lf Bush sends him to hell, when he tries to ask a question and recommends him, before a group of reporters, to go home. Moore, in fact, he heads home, but Charlton Heston, Hollywood legend who led the rifle @NRA until his death.
Outcome of Visit: religious folly, decrepitude, inhumanity, bigotry. "Error of the species," say rightly so prophetic, the gorillas who capture Heston in the first installment of Planet of the Apes (Shaffner, 1968).
Perhaps Voltaire was who better explained the case through centuries:
"Fanaticism is the effect of a false consciousness that subjects religion to the whims of fantasy and confusion of the passions. Usually comes from lawmakers that have such a petty view, or that they went beyond the limits prescribed. Their laws were only for a society deliberately chosen. Extending them by a whole people zeal, ambition and transporting from one climate to another, they should corrected accommoding to the circumstances of places and people. So what happened? That certain spirits that were more proportionate character to the crowd for which were made, receiving them warmly, becoming their apostles and martyrs to them before leaving to fulfill them to the letter. "
That is the angry and legalistic defense of weapons overpowering to life. No more than that.
www.twitter.com/acvilleda
steveox
Well-Known Member
But now the conservitive right must score points for political gain just like what Bill Clinton did on that Oka city bombing. I feel this guy had a tough time looking for a job but no one is hiring. So he exploded by killing kids. So blame the Obama admin on lack of jobs and good jobs are going overseas. If People voted for Mitt Romney and if he might been president elect thius guy wouldnt had exploded yesterday
A madman in the USA killed 28 people with a gun. A madman attack 20 people in China with a knife. None are yet dead. Does this not prove the weapon is important
steveox
Well-Known Member
Hes got a point there. When our servicemen bombing the crap outta them.
Conn muredrer is dead by his own hand. dont know about the Chinese one
Openmind
Well-Known Member
Wrong! Could you please check your sources to avoid making yourself into a bigger fool than you already are?
It was TWENTY-TWO kids. . .but NONE of them died!
You see. . .in China, they are a little more "civilized," even in their cruelty and craziness. Here your kind is so addicted to GUNS that 27 people can get killed in a few minutes!
And that old, tired argument that "if we didn't have guns, criminals would still kill. . .with knives or baseball bats. . .or anything else!"
Well. . .you see. . .when you commit a crime with a GUN, there is a much greater chance to hurt more people and that these people will DIE.
As you can see. . .in China, NONE Of the 22 children died, but merely suffered light injuries. . as horrible as this experience must have been for those poor children. . .AT LEAST THEY will survive!
Dog did you kow....in China, they are a little more "civilized," even in their cruelty and craziness..Even in their CRUELTY..WHAT?
Pandora
Well-Known Member
Well you see, they are so civilized they have mastered cruelty to a fine art! They have had lots of practice. For instance any unborn baby that isn’t a boy or is a boy but a second boy, prisoners, anyone who dares to want free speech and well the list goes on.
Too bad we are not as good as China. I worry that when my freedom grabbing government comes for me they won’t torture me in a civilized way like they do in China!
The Sandy Hook school was a gun-free zone, meaning Mr. Lanza knew that no one could shoot back when he entered the school. The shooting in July in a movie theater in Aurora, Colo. was also in a gun-free zone. Rather than engaging in yet another debate about the Second Amendment, perhaps we should be discussing whether security is enhanced or weakened by not allowing a school to be armed for self defense.
Had one guard had a firearm in either Colorado or Connecticut, there is a good chance lives might have been saved.
No law can stop a criminal hell-bent on killing. When a person determined to do harm cannot get a gun legally, he will get it illegally. Even if the 100 million guns in America were rounded up and thrown into the ocean, there will still be deranged killers. In Oklahoma City, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used simple fertilizer to kill 168 people, including 19 children under the age of six in 1995.
In gun-free Japan in 2008, a former school janitor stabbed eight children to death in their elementary school and in 1927, Bath Township Mich. was home to the worst school killing in history. The school's treasurer used bombs made with dynamite and pyrotol to kill 38 elementary school children. We can’t outlaw fertilizer or explosives or knives. Even if we did, the deranged would just find another way to kill.
Murder is already illegal. So is assaulting a child. We have enough laws. What we lack today is the power to stop evil.
Had one guard had a firearm in either Colorado or Connecticut, there is a good chance lives might have been saved.
No law can stop a criminal hell-bent on killing. When a person determined to do harm cannot get a gun legally, he will get it illegally. Even if the 100 million guns in America were rounded up and thrown into the ocean, there will still be deranged killers. In Oklahoma City, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used simple fertilizer to kill 168 people, including 19 children under the age of six in 1995.
In gun-free Japan in 2008, a former school janitor stabbed eight children to death in their elementary school and in 1927, Bath Township Mich. was home to the worst school killing in history. The school's treasurer used bombs made with dynamite and pyrotol to kill 38 elementary school children. We can’t outlaw fertilizer or explosives or knives. Even if we did, the deranged would just find another way to kill.
Murder is already illegal. So is assaulting a child. We have enough laws. What we lack today is the power to stop evil.
for a supposed expert in dealing with crazy its amazing this one can not see that its the same crazy behind these and all other such acts.
is it any wonder that another such expert treating the Virginia Tech killer failed to follow the law and report his patient ? and the result was blood needlessly spilled.
kind of explains why they point their fingers anywhere else.
don't bother with fact and reason with people ruled by emotion, its a fruitless effort.
Werbung:
Hobo1
Well-Known Member
That's a real good point... I don't see the President crying when he knows thousands of innocent woman and children are being killed in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
We play the role of world cop, and think nothing about killing people from places far away. Yet we moan and debate about when a couple dozen US citizens are killed by a gun. Oh, those others are foreigners and I can't relate to them. When someone else dies, in those foreign countries, nobody feels any pain and sadness do they?
Similar threads
