Seems appropriate.

[pjmret]

Barry Loudermilk: J6 Committee failed to preserve records, withheld communication with White House - Washington Times 8-9-23

House Republican charges J6 Committee failed to preserve records, withheld communication with W.H.



Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Georgia, listens to a speaker at a press conference, May 4, 2021, in Marietta, Ga. Police have determined a House Republican who led a tour of the U.S. Capitol the day before the Jan. 6 attack was … more >

By Alex Miller - The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 9, 2023

The Democrat-led House committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol failed to properly archive records, including documents, video of depositions and correspondence with the Biden administration, said a Republican lawmaker probing the panel’s work.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, chair of the GOP‘s investigation into the House Jan. 6 Select Committee, wrote in a series of letters obtained by The Washington Times that the previous panel did not follow the law or House rules in preserving and turning over all of the data and documents related to the panel’s investigation by the end of the congressional term last December.

Doesn't say illegal d7h

 

[Boris Norris]

The bent J-6 committee hid and/or destroyed evidence and facts it did not want Americans to see.

They were not bent because it contained 2 republicans who were the only two who had principles to stand up for democracy.

You have no evidence they destroyed any evidence. Why would they do that? To hide it from who? Dickheads like you?

Post a link where they officially confirmed they destroyed it.

 

[mark francis]

They were not bent because it contained 2 republicans who were the only two who had principles to stand up for democracy.

You have no evidence they destroyed any evidence. Why would they do that? To hide it from who? Dickheads like you?

Post a link where they officially confirmed they destroyed it.

Of course. Liars claim the J-6 committee Pelosi deliberately put together without a single conservative republican was 'bi-partisan.'

 

[pjmret]

Of course. Liars claim the J-6 committee Pelosi deliberately put together without a single conservative republican was 'bi-partisan.'

Define bent, lying moooron lol

 

[mark francis]

Define bent, lying moooron lol

3. criminal; corrupt; thus on the bend under bend n.1 ; thus bent copper, bent screw, corrupt police officer, prison-warder.

3. criminal; corrupt; thus on the bend under bend n.1 ; thus bent copper, bent screw, corrupt police officer, prison-warder.

 

[pjmret]

3. criminal; corrupt; thus on the bend under bend n.1 ; thus bent copper, bent screw, corrupt police officer, prison-warder.

3. criminal; corrupt; thus on the bend under bend n.1 ; thus bent copper, bent screw, corrupt police officer, prison-warder.

Prove the j6 committee was criminal and corrupt, lying moooron

 

[mark francis]

Prove the j6 committee was criminal and corrupt, lying moooron

They proved it themselves by stacking the committee with Trump-hating, lying leftist swamp creatures who manipulated the evidence to presence false narratives about the purpose of the mostly peaceful protesters.

 

[pjmret]

They proved it themselves by stacking the committee with Trump-hating, lying leftist swamp creatures who manipulated the evidence to presence false narratives about the purpose of the mostly peaceful protesters.

Not proof lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Of course. Liars claim the J-6 committee Pelosi deliberately put together without a single conservative republican was 'bi-partisan.'

Is Liz Cheney a Democrat? How about the other guy?
Both republicans.
You know they were on it so why deliberately tell lies. What's the point in doing that. You're not convincing anyone other than how fucking stupid you are.

 

[mark francis]

Is Liz Cheney a Democrat? How about the other guy?
Both republicans.
You know they were on it so why deliberately tell lies. What's the point in doing that. You're not convincing anyone other than how fucking stupid you are.

Pelosi hand-picked two Repugnantan lawmakers to fill out her phony 'bi-partison Trump-hating Stazi-style commie board of J-6 inquisitors to twist facts, hide and/or destroy evidence, and craft phony charges against innovcent Americans the democrats hated for supporting Trump.

 

[pjmret]

Pelosi hand-picked two Repugnantan lawmakers to fill out her phony 'bi-partison Trump-hating Stazi-style commie board of J-6 inquisitors to twist facts, hide and/or destroy evidence, and craft phony charges against innovcent Americans the democrats hated for supporting Trump.

right wing blather. lol.
you enjoy looking stupid

 

[Randomguy]

Of course. Liars claim the J-6 committee Pelosi deliberately put together without a single conservative republican was 'bi-partisan.'

This is bold faced lie. I think there was at least one Republican. And there gop refused to nominate any other.

Pelosi hand-picked two Repugnantan lawmakers to fill out her phony 'bi-partison Trump-hating Stazi-style commie board of J-6 inquisitors to twist facts, hide and/or destroy evidence, and craft phony charges against innovcent Americans the democrats hated for supporting Trump.

So you were wrong then? Why not admit it? Why not also admit that the gop refused to cooperate to name more republicans?

There are some who name-call and offer arguments. You almost never offer any arguments whatsoever. But you name-call all the time, and mindless juvenile name calls at that, all the time. No self respect?

 

[mark francis]

This is bold faced lie. I think there was at least one Republican. And there gop refused to nominate any other.

There were two radical Trump-hating republicans on Pelosi's hand-picked J-6 leftist voter-fraud denying panel of democrat inquisitiors.

 

[pjmret]

There were two radical Trump-hating republicans on Pelosi's hand-picked J-6 leftist voter-fraud denying panel of democrat inquisitiors.

Right wing blather

 

[Randomguy]

There were two radical Trump-hating republicans on Pelosi's hand-picked J-6 leftist voter-fraud denying panel of democrat inquisitiors.

It is not enough that you now casually make tte correct statement. The honorable thing to do it to acknowledge you were wrong. the vast majority of your claims are either blatantly and factually incorrect or you use flawed logic. Yet you rarely if ever admit you were wrong.